Lin

“The fact that he has 2000 years of theological scholarship to back him up puts the burden of proof on you. You have not met that burden and I hope you will repent of your errant beliefs”

There are so many theologians I enjoy reading but do not agree with their interpretations. Examples include: Infant Baptism, Pro or condoning Slavery , Baptismal regeneration and Reformers who supported the state church and it’s magistrates. Could any of these been wrong for 2000 years? 1000 years?

My friend, if you are going to put up comments like this…tell Cheryl WHERE her interpretation is wrong.