teknomom

If it’s about Calvinism, I can guarantee it would get ugly. I’ve debated it many times, and even with the best of intentions it never ends well. And with Matt, I can guarantee you’d be charged at the very least with misunderstanding and/or misrepresenting the teachings of Calvinism.

I have a hunch it’s related to his failure to understand during the radio debate that you were not claiming there are innocent people (a point I’d argue, but beside the point right now). He may be wanting to use this once again to burn the straw man he set up, that is, to take that misunderstood statement as proof that your interpretation is wrong.