teknomom

Got some links for you JB:

http://www.christianstandard.com/lettersmarapr07.asp
http://englishbibles.blogspot.com/2006/10/junia-apostle-part-1.html
http://www.godswordtowomen.org/studies/articles/juniapreato.htm
http://englishbibles.blogspot.com/2007/05/junia-response-to-michael-burer.html

I think what you’re seeing is another case of “search engine flooding”, where a few people put out a lot of documents and make sure they get posted and repeated all over the place. And of course CBMW has a vested interest in spreading their teachings far and wide. But when we look at all the research and see that the majority opinion of scholars is that no male form of Junia existed until the middle ages, the burden of proof is on the “gender benders” to present evidence that is recognized by both sides (and non-Christian scholars with no ax to grind) as credible scholarship.