Browse / Scripture Commentary / Comment
Maurie Nord

Maurie Nord

2013-03-04

I would just add this to clarify a little further my thoughts about the seed of woman and the sinless Saviour Jesus.

It was from the seed of Mary, that Jesus Christ was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit not having the sin nature of Adam, He is the pure, sinless, Son of God who came into the world to take back the authority seized by Satan at the fall. He is the Second Adam, the Son of God, and the apocalyptic Son of Man in whom will be the consummation of all history. However, Jesus is also of the seed of Abraham and his descendant, the seed of David, therefore, Jesus must carry the human Ydna of Adam and his descendants through Abraham, Isaac, Jacob , Judah, and David. It is my belief that neither a human egg or a sperm alone bear any kind of sin nature, but at conception the sin nature is passed on through both parents. Mary’s egg alone was pure, the Holy Spirit overshadowed her and God provided an exact copy of the original Adamic Ydna untarnished by sin. The Word, the Eternal Son of God is made incarnate in this perfectly sinless body which also fulfills the requirements of “second Adam, seed of Abraham, seed of David without compromising Jesus sonship or divinity in any way. The Roman Catholic view mistakenly sees the necessity to have Mary “immaculately conceived” as well to provide a sinless Son of God. However, the Evangelicals’ rather nebulous view that the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary and “somehow” (we can’t understand it) she conceived. Clearly to fulfill the above scriptural (not traditional) and scientific requirements, to be a fully human male, Jesus must have Ydna and that Ydan will be none other than that of his ancestors all the way back to Adam as outlined in His genealogy.

Also, I think the most accurate interpretation of Genesis 3 will be achieved by avoiding the mistake of Adam and Eve, namely, “the blame game”.= “she gave me the fruit”………….”the serpent tricked me,” and now one of the latest to come up with that not even Eve thought about: “The man you put me with utterly “failed” to protect me. In response to this Adam could have turned to God, “Why didn’t you protect me? You could have warned me that Eve was going to disobey.” The bottom line is that both were to blame and both have sin natures as a consequence.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Original Article

Eve Deceived Adam Not

2008-05-18