Pinklight

‘My analysis is that we are unsure about the woman, but sure about the man. And this is enough. We would like to know more perhaps, but we need to be grateful for what we have.’

But what do we know about what she knew? There’s no evidence she knew what God told the alone man, but there is evidence that she knew something that God said, and the evidence IS her own words. That is what we know. We cannot be unsure about what she said because that’s recorded. We know what she said. But what many are unsure about is what she said, God said but that is being unsure about what she knew (said). We cannot say that what she said, God said is NOT what she knew. We can only say that it WAS what she knew.

The question then is what do we make or what have we made of what she knew (said).

Make sense?