Pinklight
2008-08-01
Without evidence to begin with there is nothing to consider to begin with.
We have to take the evidence that we do have first which is what we have to consider, then we can take what we don’t have, and weigh what we don’t have against what we do have, and them come to conclusions.
Going backwards:
- We have what she said, God said.
- We have God saying ‘you (pl)’ to the both of them.
- We have what God said to the man and when he said it, and what he said to the man is less than what she said, God said, ‘you (pl).’
- We don’t have when God said what she said he did.
Conclusion: We have what she knew God said, and we also have why God says ‘you’ (pl).
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more