Pinklight

Scratch my last paragraph, in my comment #28. It did NOT come out right. Forgive me!

Comp: she added to God’s word (the command given to the man)
Egal: the bible does not say she added to God’s word
Comp: the bible does not say that she did not add to God’s word

When the comp responds with that, their argument from silence is only continuing. This is because no comp would say it without considering first that she did add to God’s word. And the egal’s response is not from silence since it is in the defense position.

Now this is different from ‘what she said, God said is more than what God said to the man’ or ‘what God said to the man is less than what she said, God said.’ The reason is because here in this case no one is saying that she added to God’s word.

Sorry for all the corrections I have had to make! (I need to slow down when I type it out, I think.)