Chris

Paula : “It’s all about deception or seduction; there is nothing about authority.”

Is this another negative you don’t have to prove? Apparently, you get to make all kinds of dogmatic assertions this way without ever having to produce a single piece of evidence to support them.

Paula: “Also note that when authorities disagree, it is fallacious to appeal to them.”

This is false. It’s not like competing authorities simply cancel each other out. Please. Besides, I’m kind of looking for the authorities Cheryl is using to support her arguments, especially on the specific points I’ve mentioned.