Paula

It’s a cop-out, pure and simple. And a logical fallacy (fits several categories).

If emotion were affecting your logic, then it should be easy to point out the logical errors you make only when “emotional”. I’d like to see them pinpoint such errors, prove their “causes”, and then prove that they have no such emotional influence to their logic.

But of course none of that will ever happen, because it’s just a cop-out.

Kinda like saying nobody has a right to teach Bible without that magical umbrella known as “covering” or “oversight”.