Nicole
2009-01-28
“was not his (man’s) equal in that she was his “helper”.”
Doesn’t the word for “helper” refer to God in other passages?
If he claims women are “less human” or made in the “indirect” image of God, then I must ask how a sub-human (mother) gives birth to a human (son)?
“A man, just by virtue of his manhood, is called to lead for God. A woman, just by virtue of her womanhood, is called to help for God. ”
Does this strike anyone else as arrogant? Who are we mere humans that God would look on us with favor, let alone have us “lead” for Him? I mean, you have Calvinists and Arminians (stances formed by men) both “leading” for God claiming they are right.
I hope I’m not reading into his words too much.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more