pinklight

“The issue at hand now is if the Son can be subordinate in function but not in essence.”

The woman is subordinate in function but not in essence based on her femaleness (sex alone) rather than her “womanhood” (essence). The deal is the same here with the Son. There’s somekind of division of “nature” going on (intentional or not). The Son is subordinated in function based on him being human rather than his “God-Manhood or Man-Godhood”.

I’m trying to wrap my mind around all this…