pinklight

I agree but since “subordinate” is permanent and unchanging, the it is the more precise term. And if submission is a permanent role of then woman, then she’s a subordinate.

I’m starting to get a clearer picture of complementarianism. If submission is the woman’s permanent unchanging role, then compism offically teaches subordination. I don’t know of any comp who would say that submission doesn’t belong to the woman. Without it, there is no complementarianism anyway. Anyone know of a comp view that doesn’t assign submission to the woman permanently?