Dave

“Like i have said previously Paul often uses ‘Theos’ to refer to the Father.”

Yep, you said it before and did not back it up with any evidence and you have done it again! I would have thought you would have had mopre of a case with John than Paul…but can you back it up?

“According the Amos Love’s interpretation, it must then mean that the Father, Son and Spirit were all crucified! Is this what people really want to believe?”

Mark I went over this before as have others. You are the one who is messing around with the Trinity! You want to say that the three who are one were completely seperate at the cross. We are simply saying that they were still three who were one at the cross. Mark, you really need to deal with this, agree to disagree OR see the light! Your view is the one that does not cater for three being one. Our view does. Our view also deals with one being three. Your view does this too well! You, Mark, are not holding the balance. I do not know how I can state this any more clearly!

How do you deal with Jesus being raised from death by all three? Where is the conclusive Biblical evidence for ESS?