gengwall

“Unfortunately it appears that John Starke will not be answering the questions we have. I have tried to engage CBMW since 2006 and silence is the only answer of preference for them.”

That is unfortunate. It would be great to hear “from the horse’s mouth” the answers to the many questions posed here. I often wonder how well they actually know you, Cheryl? Do they know this blog and your positions well, or was John’s brief comment (really, just a position statement) rendered in ignorance of what goes on here? The “hit and run” as some put it, indicates to me that either John is being simply patronizing or he somehow believes this blog is something different than it really is. What I mena is, I don’t know if he believes he will get a fair hearing here. Anyone who researched this blog would know that the majority of what goes on here is objective and fair minded debate, but a person who maybe only drops in and reads a comment or two may be under the impression that this is some feminist hate blog and conclude that they should not waste their time here.

John – if you ares till “lurking”, I can assure you of two things:

You will encounter many men here as well, so you are amongst brothers as well as sisters;
The people here are not radicals but are serious minded fellow believers who have serious and well thought out questions to ask and serious and well thought out responses to complementarian positions.

So, John, if you were just being patronizing, shame on you (maybe that is one of those “imperfection” you reference). On the other hand, if you are simply worried you would be wasting your time in a feminist buzz saw, have no fear!