Lin
2009-12-21
“I am not sure how Grudem can be so positive about the Danvers statement when CBMW have had to answer question after question clarifying all the ‘details’”
RK McGregor Wright wrote a response to the Danvers statement item by item that drove mac truck sized holes through it. I wish it were online but it isn’t. It is pretty old…early 90’s, I think.
The statement is nothing but a bunch of presuppositions that are backed up by proof texting WHEN the statements are backed up by any scripture at all.
It was more of a political document. And I can remember the pressure many felt to support it in order to be in the right evangelical club. The statement was in response to the culture. Which is interesting if you think that one through.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more