pinklight

Let me see if I got this right.
In comp thought, flesh (gender) is what determines spiritual difference in function (pastor, teacher, leader) and if the flesh rather than the spiritual (sonship) is what determines spiritual difference in function then women are not equal spiritualy to men since it is not the spiritual (sonship) which determines their spiritual gifting but rather their flesh.
Now, if women were gifted based on their sonship, in comp thought, then women could be considered spiritualy equal to men but since their equal sonship is denied based on their flesh, then it is the flesh which determines the spiritual.
Their are differences in the flesh (men and women) but there are no differences in the spiritual (sonship) and men and women in the flesh and spiritual are equal even though there are differences in the flesh.
Gifts aren’t given based on the flesh (male or female) but rather given based on sonship. When comp thought denies this, it denies spiritual equality.