@DannySlavich James wasn’t just referring to the poor and the rich. He could have just as well been referring to egalitarians and complementarians—some of the latter who are not even content to have the former sit in their own churches but have to relegate them outside of fellowship. https://t.co/TVjOXh41k4
Debate Points
@DannySlavich James wasn’t just referring to the poor and the rich. He could have just as well been referring to egalitarians and complementarians—some of the latter who are not even content to have the former sit in their own churches but have to relegate them outside of fellowship. https://t.co/TV
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more