Philippians 3:1
Paul writes: "To write the same things again is no trouble to me, and it is a safeguard for you." Paul's method was repetition — every important doctrine is stated multiple times throughout Scripture for safety. This principle exposes the weakness of the complementarian position: if God truly intended to prohibit all women from teaching men for all time, this would be the single most repeated law in the NT. Instead, the alleged prohibition appears exactly once (1 Tim 2:12) in a single, disputed passage addressed to a specific situation. There is no repetition, no second witness. Every other doctrine Paul considered essential — justification by faith, the resurrection, the unity of Jew and Gentile, love as the greatest commandment — appears repeatedly across multiple epistles. The absence of repetition for 1 Tim 2:12 is evidence that it is not a universal law but a situational instruction.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreRelated Articles (12)
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong With Genesis 1–3: ‘Was Women’s Submission Just A Curse To Be Overturned?’
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus
Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona
Is There A Law That Forbids Women From Teaching Men
Cheryl Schatz
Does God Have One Unique Law Part Two
Cheryl Schatz
1 Corinthians 11 And Paul
Cheryl Schatz
Paul And The Head From 1 Corinthians 11
Cheryl Schatz
1 Corinthians 113 And Head
Cheryl Schatz
Adam Eve Fruit Inspectors
Cheryl Schatz
1 Cor14 Concludes
Cheryl Schatz
Mike Seaver And Cheryl Schatz 3
Cheryl Schatz
Does God Have One Unique Law Part Three
Cheryl Schatz