Search — Theology Explorer

@Jeremiahsentme @FrancisDePaul1 @Busybee32433175 @SpesMagnaMark @father_rmv 1 Ti

@Jeremiahsentme @FrancisDePaul1 @Busybee32433175 @SpesMagnaMark @father_rmv 1 Tim 2:11-15 deals with a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine. It is not restricting qualified women fr

1 Tim 2:11-15 general

@1boreen_ye @Jessicakayanja @RobertKayanja Paul is refuting what the Corinthians

@1boreen_ye @Jessicakayanja @RobertKayanja Paul is refuting what the Corinthians wrote to him in their letter (see 1 Cor 7:1). Otherwise it contradicts Paul’s clear and inclusive instructions in chap

@JoshuaAdankala This is Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1

@JoshuaAdankala This is Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1) and refuting their statement about women being silent. Otherwise it contradicts Paul’s inclusive language in

@jefe_tweets This passage is Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1) and refuting their statement that women must be silent. Otherwise it contradicts with the inclusive language Paul has for the rest of the chapter and else...

@jefe_tweets This passage is Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1) and refuting their statement that women must be silent. Otherwise it contradicts with the inclusive lang

@laurel_prolife @Totally_Brandon @ThomasCoutouzis @ChrisHohnholz @ScottAniol @Ja

@laurel_prolife @Totally_Brandon @ThomasCoutouzis @ChrisHohnholz @ScottAniol @Janet_Mefferd Im taking it precisely with Paul’s specific grammar in context of what he says in chapters 1 and 2.

commentary

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Tim 2:11-15 general

@DeniedTitan @CrankyKat @RevJacquiLewis In 1 Tim 2:11-15, Paul is dealing with a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine in Ephesus. He is not restricting women from teaching true doctrine. In 1 Cor 14:34-35, Paul is quoting from the...

@DeniedTitan @CrankyKat @RevJacquiLewis In 1 Tim 2:11-15, Paul is dealing with a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine in Ephesus. He is not restricting women from teaching true doct

@laurel_prolife @Totally_Brandon @ThomasCoutouzis @ChrisHohnholz @ScottAniol @Janet_Mefferd “She [singular] will be saved [future] through the childbearing [definite article + noun] if they [plural] continue in faith, love, and sanctity with moderati...

@laurel_prolife @Totally_Brandon @ThomasCoutouzis @ChrisHohnholz @ScottAniol @Janet_Mefferd “She [singular] will be saved [future] through the childbearing [definite article + noun] if they [plural] c

@2Primarch @libertastochter @RedPillTradCon @PhoenixLioness3 @rachallison1 "Be silent and shut up as this is what God wants from you" - No, this is false! You are misreading scripture. 1 Timothy 2:12 - This is about a specific deceived woman in Eph...

@2Primarch @libertastochter @RedPillTradCon @PhoenixLioness3 @rachallison1 "Be silent and shut up as this is what God wants from you" - No, this is false! You are misreading scripture. 1 Timothy 2:1

1 Timothy 2:12 debate

1 Cor 14:34-36 1 Cor 7:1 1 Tim 2:11-15 general

@JacobSpray5 @Believer1611KJV 1 Tim 2:11-15 is about false teaching, not about preventing women from teaching true doctrine. 1 Cor 14:34-36 is Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1) and refuting it. As for the requirement...

@JacobSpray5 @Believer1611KJV 1 Tim 2:11-15 is about false teaching, not about preventing women from teaching true doctrine. 1 Cor 14:34-36 is Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1

@HITlifter Those passages don't restrict pastoral, preaching and teaching work t

@HITlifter Those passages don't restrict pastoral, preaching and teaching work to only males. https://t.co/PWKFTEoOdx

@HierB4TheAC @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals It says word of mouth or by letter fro

@HierB4TheAC @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals It says word of mouth or by letter from us (the apostles). It is referring to the same traditions, not different ones. Not everyone had a copy of the letter

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear I’m ok with “better suited.” However, I’m thinking you are wanting this to go somewhere I don’t agree with. My wife and I shared the responsibility for raising our children. She worked evenings and sometimes week...

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear I’m ok with “better suited.” However, I’m thinking you are wanting this to go somewhere I don’t agree with. My wife and I shared the responsibility for raising our

@bellator777dei @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals Yes, this description of what God did through Paul…even though a cloth used for blowing your nose in…is amazing. The faith was in God doing the miracles through Paul, not in the handkerchief. Also, it is...

@bellator777dei @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals Yes, this description of what God did through Paul…even though a cloth used for blowing your nose in…is amazing. The faith was in God doing the miracles t

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear How God ordered things so that the mother would have changes in her brain that would incline her to be able to take special care of the child, to lose sleep feeding the baby—its a fascinating thing to see this. Yet...

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear How God ordered things so that the mother would have changes in her brain that would incline her to be able to take special care of the child, to lose sleep feeding

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear The way you are phrasing your question—and what I know you believe about gender role linkages—leads me to believe you are asking whether men can replace a mother in child-rearing. I don’t think they can ever replac...

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear The way you are phrasing your question—and what I know you believe about gender role linkages—leads me to believe you are asking whether men can replace a mother in

@j_bryan_price @GrandmaD62 @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals Language has limitations and can be misinterpreted, but this does not mean that the meaning of its author is lost and requires someone else to tell you what it means. Everything and everyone is...

@j_bryan_price @GrandmaD62 @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals Language has limitations and can be misinterpreted, but this does not mean that the meaning of its author is lost and requires someone else to t

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear Paul, I think that this is a mischaracterizat

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear Paul, I think that this is a mischaracterization of what Kaeley is saying. We believe there are differences and that both mother and father are needed but you want

@Dranu86 @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals These are just the English words translati

@Dranu86 @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals These are just the English words translating the Greek (NASB 2020). It means that the scriptures contain all I need to be thoroughly equipped, to be made perfect

commentary

@KnightsRepose @j_bryan_price @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals That’s a good passage

@KnightsRepose @j_bryan_price @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals That’s a good passage to come back with. What traditions do you think Paul was referring to here? Do you think he meant any tradition that

question

@j_bryan_price @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals So “all scripture AND TRADITION is i

@j_bryan_price @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals So “all scripture AND TRADITION is inspired by God…”? But wouldn’t that be adding to what God said?

@TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals "Real Christians revere relics" 😬 Since "all scrip

@TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals "Real Christians revere relics" 😬 Since "all scripture is inspired by God...so that the man of God may be fully capable, equipped for every good work" (2 Tim 3:16-17) ⎯ w

2 Tim 3:16-17 question

@CovenantReform2 @Name_Unspoken_2 @SHoddeMiller @BethMooreLPM That is not “basic

@CovenantReform2 @Name_Unspoken_2 @SHoddeMiller @BethMooreLPM That is not “basic Bible.” Where does the Bible refer to senior pastor?

question

@RevdBrettMurphy @WATCHChair @leicestercofe @churchofengland It’s not unscriptur

@RevdBrettMurphy @WATCHChair @leicestercofe @churchofengland It’s not unscriptural for a woman to preach true doctrine. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

@EllaFlash @b161750 @TheMuppetPastor They both chose to sin, but Adam was not de

@EllaFlash @b161750 @TheMuppetPastor They both chose to sin, but Adam was not deceived because of his experience with God and observing Him creating prior to Eve who didn’t have this experience. https

@Butch30586594 No, this is referring to a transcription error in Euripides' text

@Butch30586594 No, this is referring to a transcription error in Euripides' text not the Bible.

@Jose287631 @igarglewithfire I appreciate your tone. “This is the brass tacks,

@Jose287631 @igarglewithfire I appreciate your tone. “This is the brass tacks, bottom of the line, bare truth that's imho God inspired.” What, that women cannot preach? That’s what I’m contesting a

question

@DavidCShell1 @Emma41913442572 @p3_1415926i @TnShitStirrer @Eric_Conn What makes you think every Christian believed what you do? Even if all got it wrong, the apostles didn’t. Jesus picked 12 Jewish males but we don’t say only Jewish males can be p...

@DavidCShell1 @Emma41913442572 @p3_1415926i @TnShitStirrer @Eric_Conn What makes you think every Christian believed what you do? Even if all got it wrong, the apostles didn’t. Jesus picked 12 Jewish

@DST_QA The 1924 Montgomery Translation did. Translators are affected by bias and have blind spots too. Further, we have Paul explicitly responding to their letter (see 1 Cor 7:1). And if it was not a quote here, it would contradict other parts of ...

@DST_QA The 1924 Montgomery Translation did. Translators are affected by bias and have blind spots too. Further, we have Paul explicitly responding to their letter (see 1 Cor 7:1). And if it was not

@Mormonger 1 Cor 14:34-36 ⎯ Paul refutes Judaizers infiltrating Corinthian churc

@Mormonger 1 Cor 14:34-36 ⎯ Paul refutes Judaizers infiltrating Corinthian church. https://t.co/0UJxaSEb7U

1 Cor 14:34-36 general

@godlyHomeGirl 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to

@godlyHomeGirl 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to Paul (1 Cor 7:1). Paul is refuting this quote from their letter. The "law" refers to the Jewish Oral Traditions in th

@TeregianKunta @AnyineKu @Milly_nassolo 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the lette

@TeregianKunta @AnyineKu @Milly_nassolo 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to Paul (1 Cor 7:1). Paul is refuting this quote from their letter. The "law" refers to the Jew

@Onewhitefrijole @BabuDark1 @NCRonline 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter

@Onewhitefrijole @BabuDark1 @NCRonline 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to Paul (1 Cor 7:1). Paul is refuting this quote from their letter. The "law" refers to the Jewi

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-04

@Softball_Nani @Robert_S_Morley @KaeleyT I was more disappointed that my pastor

@Softball_Nani @Robert_S_Morley @KaeleyT I was more disappointed that my pastor still met with us even though he admitted he wasn’t feeling 100%. He trusted the mask…

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-04

RT @P_McCulloughMD: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts—T

RT @P_McCulloughMD: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts—Thanks for your strength and courage ⁦@MdBreathe⁩ ⁦@drpaulma…

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-02

@Rach4Patriarchy How do you define “venerate”? I regard the apostles with respe

@Rach4Patriarchy How do you define “venerate”? I regard the apostles with respect but if I were to create icons of them and pray to them that would cross a line over to things that should only be don

@cwierzbicki9 Wrong letter. 1 Tim 2:15. “But she [singular, feminine] will be

@cwierzbicki9 Wrong letter. 1 Tim 2:15. “But she [singular, feminine] will be preserved [future] through the [definite article] childbearing [noun]—if they [plural] continue in faith, love, and sanc

1 Tim 2:15 debate

@cwierzbicki9 Thanks for quoting the passage. The context is the entire letter,

@cwierzbicki9 Thanks for quoting the passage. The context is the entire letter, the author and recipient, the references being made by Paul, the specific terms and grammar Paul uses, etc. If you pic

1 Tim 2:15 commentary

@AntGrayLiving @skolvikings @KPalms21 @farmingandJesus Many people and cults can say that about many passages. The only way to know whether my interpretation is correct is to test it against the scripture. I’ve worked to take all details in the rel...

@AntGrayLiving @skolvikings @KPalms21 @farmingandJesus Many people and cults can say that about many passages. The only way to know whether my interpretation is correct is to test it against the scri

@B_Clemethy @VivekGRamaswamy That’s not what that passage means though I complet

@B_Clemethy @VivekGRamaswamy That’s not what that passage means though I completely agree teachers should be qualified and teach true doctrine not false. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

commentary

@AntGrayLiving @skolvikings @KPalms21 @farmingandJesus I go through 1 Tim 2:11-1

@AntGrayLiving @skolvikings @KPalms21 @farmingandJesus I go through 1 Tim 2:11-15 thoroughly here. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

1 Tim 2:11-15 general

@randyadkins1689 @DST_QA @YourCalvinist The NT is in Greek and sometimes the English hides the specificity of the original text and smooths it out according to one interpretation. What do you suppose Peter might have been thinking of in Paul’s writi...

@randyadkins1689 @DST_QA @YourCalvinist The NT is in Greek and sometimes the English hides the specificity of the original text and smooths it out according to one interpretation. What do you suppose

2 Peter 3:16 general

@CatOnTheFridge @BrianMonzon Take a look at this interpretation. Paul is quotin

@CatOnTheFridge @BrianMonzon Take a look at this interpretation. Paul is quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (1 Cor 7:1) and refuting them. The law is from the Jewish Oral Traditions in the

@TimothyGroves2 @RongpiSr @NoHolyScripture 1 Tim 2:11-15 refers to a specific deceived woman (like Eve was deceived) whose husband is not deceived but is silent (like Adam was). Paul doesn't name her in his letter to Timothy as she evidently had not...

@TimothyGroves2 @RongpiSr @NoHolyScripture 1 Tim 2:11-15 refers to a specific deceived woman (like Eve was deceived) whose husband is not deceived but is silent (like Adam was). Paul doesn't name her

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate

@TimothyGroves2 @RongpiSr @NoHolyScripture 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the le

@TimothyGroves2 @RongpiSr @NoHolyScripture 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to Paul (1 Cor 7:1). Paul is refuting this quote from their letter. The "law" refers to the

@ThinkyTexan @Guy_JustaGuy3 @IrisB42744268 @WastedAerospace @MilesMosley666 @KerridwinR @RealDoctorT @JustUnderReal @_truthswordsa @MurphyYuiko @Ivotian @NuckChorris16 @AnansiAkin59777 @BrianNazarenus @realdfk @Frenchg11623069 @TessFromWessex @Andrew...

@ThinkyTexan @Guy_JustaGuy3 @IrisB42744268 @WastedAerospace @MilesMosley666 @KerridwinR @RealDoctorT @JustUnderReal @_truthswordsa @MurphyYuiko @Ivotian @NuckChorris16 @AnansiAkin59777 @BrianNazarenus

@LLLloyd1 Paul was quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote to him (see 1 C

@LLLloyd1 Paul was quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote to him (see 1 Cor 7:1). He quotes from them to refute them. 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from that letter which refers to Jewish Oral Tr

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-30

@RenOfMen @Rach4Patriarchy @KnowlandKnows Scripture is not explicit about pastors being male only. Paul is dealing with a specific situation in Ephesus that he and Timothy whom he wrote his letter to would know about. It was not someone to name yet...

@RenOfMen @Rach4Patriarchy @KnowlandKnows Scripture is not explicit about pastors being male only. Paul is dealing with a specific situation in Ephesus that he and Timothy whom he wrote his letter to

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-30

@Buzzsaws1990 @Rach4Patriarchy That point in BDAG is refuting that the Hebrew passages listed do NOT establish the meaning cousin. The Hebrew is used loosely in isolated cases, but this is the Greek and the context doesn't make sense of cousin. The...

@Buzzsaws1990 @Rach4Patriarchy That point in BDAG is refuting that the Hebrew passages listed do NOT establish the meaning cousin. The Hebrew is used loosely in isolated cases, but this is the Greek

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-30

@Buzzsaws1990 @Rach4Patriarchy I should have looked adelphos up first before I a

@Buzzsaws1990 @Rach4Patriarchy I should have looked adelphos up first before I agreed it can mean cousins... This is from the BDAG Greek Lexicon: https://t.co/ds9KThBeIe

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-29

@Rach4Patriarchy See here for a dive into what the Bible says… https://t.co/X13D

@Rach4Patriarchy See here for a dive into what the Bible says… https://t.co/X13DcslC8p