Search — Theology Explorer

Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more

All (18955) Scripture Commentary (10562) Theology (279) Mike Winger (8069) Pulpit (45)

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-26

@m_james76997 @MikeWingerii I clearly meant other fathers and husbands being r

@m_james76997 @MikeWingerii I clearly meant *other* fathers and husbands being responsible to rescue or defend the fatherless.

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-26

@MikeWingerii Notice that none of the verses you listed say specifically that fa

@MikeWingerii Notice that none of the verses you listed say specifically that fathers and husbands are called to defend the fatherless and widows. Yes, they are included⎯but it would refer to those wh

debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-26

@rofbethany @CherylSchatz 1. Again, just because someone is identified with their husband (perhaps because it was the men who are in the genealogies), it does not mean that Deborah was “qualified” by her husband. I ask you again, what do you mean she...

@rofbethany @CherylSchatz 1. Again, just because someone is identified with their husband (perhaps because it was the men who are in the genealogies), it does not mean that Deborah was “qualified” by

question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@rofbethany @CherylSchatz I’m not her husband. https://t.co/zgOaCmXxSn

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@rofbethany @CherylSchatz 1. God doesn’t qualify Deborah by her husband. Referring to her husband does not “qualify” her by him. What specific role does her husband play in her decisions and statements? 2. Barak didn’t fail. Barak was willing to hum...

@rofbethany @CherylSchatz 1. God doesn’t qualify Deborah by her husband. Referring to her husband does not “qualify” her by him. What specific role does her husband play in her decisions and statement

question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie My apologies…I didn’t recognize the typo. Deleting my c

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie My apologies…I didn’t recognize the typo. Deleting my comment. But women are not forbidden to have authority over men just like Deborah wasn’t forbidden but appointed to have

debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie That is false doctrine. And using it to treat believers as not part of his church is divisive. "As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that suc...

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie That is false doctrine. And using it to treat believers as not part of his church is divisive. "As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice,

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie Those passages only forbid if you read them in complete

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie Those passages only forbid if you read them in complete isolation to the rest of Paul’s letter. You need to go learn some humility and stop teaching what you don’t understand

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie You are divisive causing division in Jesus’ church. You need to stop. "As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that such a person is warped and ...

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie You are divisive causing division in Jesus’ church. You need to stop. "As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do w

Titus 3:10-11 general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie What? I cannot quote the Bible? I’m obeying exactly wh

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie What? I cannot quote the Bible? I’m obeying exactly what Paul said and meant in its context with all details being inspired. I don’t just read 1 or 2 verses. A text taken ou

commentary

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie You are not recognizing Paul’s command from the Lord th

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie You are not recognizing Paul’s command from the Lord that all can prophesy and all can learn. Paul’s remedy for people like you: “But if anyone does not recognize this, he i

1Co 14:38 debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie If you cannot read in context, how will you understand

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie If you cannot read in context, how will you understand what God intends? Think—if it is a sin for a woman to have authority, then why did God appoint Deborah as the judge and

debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie Actually, you don’t know what you are so confidently talking about. "Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, thro...

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie Actually, you don’t know what you are so confidently talking about. "Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie No, I’m completely sober. I am not a theologian of sata

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie No, I’m completely sober. I am not a theologian of satan. Lilith is not in scripture.

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie How strange. “Forbidding” what is not forbidden is actu

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie How strange. “Forbidding” what is not forbidden is actually doctrines of demons. Forbidding marriage, forbidding certain foods…and yes, forbidding godly women from teaching tr

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie Wow that’s so crazy. Do you even submit to abuse?

debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@Alex7Shiro @Peacemaker811 When God speaks to the woman and says “your desire wi

@Alex7Shiro @Peacemaker811 When God speaks to the woman and says “your desire will be for your husband and he shall rule over you” this is spoken as a prophecy, not what God desires or actively causes

Gen 3:15 general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@lilyswaller Paul’s intention was to help the Corinthians to understand the basis for the tradition to not cover their heads. The reason for the complication is that the wife has two “heads” because she symbolically links back to the first woman and ...

@lilyswaller Paul’s intention was to help the Corinthians to understand the basis for the tradition to not cover their heads. The reason for the complication is that the wife has two “heads” because s

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam Ron, yes, that was my mistake as the text is clearly God speaking to the serpent. Galatians makes it clear that it is not to seeds but to a singular seed, so you are right that Rom 16:19 is only because believers are “in Christ...

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam Ron, yes, that was my mistake as the text is clearly God speaking to the serpent. Galatians makes it clear that it is not to seeds but to a singular seed, so you are right that

@m_james76997 @MikeWingerii I clearly meant *other* fathers and husbands being r

@MikeWingerii Notice that none of the verses you listed say specifically that fa

@rofbethany @CherylSchatz 1. Again, just because someone is identified with their husband (perhaps because it was the men who are in the genealogies), it does not mean that Deborah was “qualified” by her husband. I ask you again, what do you mean she...

@rofbethany @CherylSchatz I’m not her husband. https://t.co/zgOaCmXxSn

@rofbethany @CherylSchatz 1. God doesn’t qualify Deborah by her husband. Referring to her husband does not “qualify” her by him. What specific role does her husband play in her decisions and statements? 2. Barak didn’t fail. Barak was willing to hum...

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie My apologies…I didn’t recognize the typo. Deleting my c

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie That is false doctrine. And using it to treat believers as not part of his church is divisive. "As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that suc...

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie Those passages only forbid if you read them in complete

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie You are divisive causing division in Jesus’ church. You need to stop. "As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that such a person is warped and ...

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie What? I cannot quote the Bible? I’m obeying exactly wh

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie You are not recognizing Paul’s command from the Lord th

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie If you cannot read in context, how will you understand

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie Actually, you don’t know what you are so confidently talking about. "Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, thro...

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie No, I’m completely sober. I am not a theologian of sata

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie How strange. “Forbidding” what is not forbidden is actu

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie Wow that’s so crazy. Do you even submit to abuse?

@Alex7Shiro @Peacemaker811 When God speaks to the woman and says “your desire wi

@lilyswaller Paul’s intention was to help the Corinthians to understand the basis for the tradition to not cover their heads. The reason for the complication is that the wife has two “heads” because she symbolically links back to the first woman and ...

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam Ron, yes, that was my mistake as the text is clearly God speaking to the serpent. Galatians makes it clear that it is not to seeds but to a singular seed, so you are right that Rom 16:19 is only because believers are “in Christ...

Leon Morris, a complementarian commentator, says in 1Cor 11:3 that κεφαλή (gr:ke

This is absurd and clearly unscriptural since Jesus was single and passed 30 and

@terryne02461221 Yikes…4 out of 49 people don’t think the Bible is literal on Ev

@sake_heavens @sailemptyskies @lilyswaller Is there any scripture which represen

@GetoD6812 @pastherandie First, God commanded the woman to rule, so ruling creat

@jackedpatriarch @bibleradioapp Serving the interests of others above my own is

@lilyswaller You are right to ask questions like this. The scriptures indicate t

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley Eventually God will judge the darkened minds of egalita

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley My convictions on this are not suppressing the truth in

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley You may not feel comfortable listening to truth from a

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley When it comes to male only leadership and teachers, I a

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley In the case of 1Co 11:17ff, there were some that were not respecting their brothers and sisters so much that they would drink and eat without them so that the others wouldn’t get anything thinking that this was the Lord’s sup...

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley As for 1Cor 11:19, yes there were factions in Corinth, and their rightness or wrongness is not asserted merely because they had differences of opinions. Paul was clear that dividing themselves by associating with a particular...

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley Surely you realize there are things that are actually sin and then there are debatable matters, right? How can a godly woman teaching truth to a man or pastoring be a sin when it’s not stated as such and when you have clear e...

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley So how is it that you say somehow a godly woman teaching truth to men or pastoring is in the same category as a woman saying she is a man or wanting to change her s3x or living contrary to s3x confined to marriage which is be...

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley Ron, you know that I’m not saying that every view is off limits. You know that I already said that my egalitarian church just left the RCA because they ordained same s3x pastors, right? Obviously I believe that you cannot di...

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley Ron, you know that this is not what I think as I have g

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley Note: I’m not saying that your church needs to become e

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley What if they believe scripture teaches differently than

@DabDabChill Except this passage which is supposedly an authority hierarchy. And

@PeterThreshwood @Almsivi7 Headship doesn’t mean authority over in this context.

@DabDabChill Actually the order is: 1. Christ -&gt; all men 2. A husband -&gt; a

@KiraKatsugiri Cute. Yeah, none of those suited what I was looking for. I wanted

@UpifLips Someone who believes both males and females are equally called to serv

@The_Sig_ You are importing a modern understand of what “head” means in the English. You have to investigate to understand what Paul means by using this term in context. Since both Jesus and the Father are the uncreated creator, there is no sense in ...

@UpifLips No, this is not it. Both males and females fall into bad teaching and

@ronhenzel @carol66944 There’s no slippery slope here as I’m merely rejecting a doctrine created by man. The idea of gender hierarchy of authority is not the teaching of the New Testament. Even in the OT, there was no sense that obeying a woman in a ...

@ronhenzel @carol66944 Paul is identifying two things: the time order of the cre

@pastherandie @bibleradioapp Yes, the idea that the husband and the wife are bot

@bibleradioapp It’s a give and take much of the time. On some things we just don

@Almsivi7 Adam observed her coming from his flesh and bone so he described it: Isha from Ish. Even later, Eve’s name means the mother of all living, so it’s an acknowledgment of her importance. Hagar called God “the God who sees” ⎯ does her ‘naming...

Bible Link Settings

@m_james76997 @MikeWingerii I clearly meant other fathers and husbands being r

@DabDabChill Actually the order is: 1. Christ -> all men 2. A husband -> a