Search — Theology Explorer

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear The way you are phrasing your question—and what I know you believe about gender role linkages—leads me to believe you are asking whether men can replace a mother in child-rearing. I don’t think they can ever replac...

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear The way you are phrasing your question—and what I know you believe about gender role linkages—leads me to believe you are asking whether men can replace a mother in

@j_bryan_price @GrandmaD62 @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals Language has limitations and can be misinterpreted, but this does not mean that the meaning of its author is lost and requires someone else to tell you what it means. Everything and everyone is...

@j_bryan_price @GrandmaD62 @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals Language has limitations and can be misinterpreted, but this does not mean that the meaning of its author is lost and requires someone else to t

@TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals @HwsEleutheroi Where did you get this from? Regard

@TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals @HwsEleutheroi Where did you get this from? Regardless if true, Augustine was not one of the apostles and didn’t write scripture. We need to go back to scripture.

@KaeleyT @pauldirks @CatholicABear 🤗

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear Paul, I think that this is a mischaracterizat

@pauldirks @KaeleyT @CatholicABear Paul, I think that this is a mischaracterization of what Kaeley is saying. We believe there are differences and that both mother and father are needed but you want

@Dranu86 @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals These are just the English words translati

@Dranu86 @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals These are just the English words translating the Greek (NASB 2020). It means that the scriptures contain all I need to be thoroughly equipped, to be made perfect

commentary

@KnightsRepose @j_bryan_price @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals That’s a good passage

@KnightsRepose @j_bryan_price @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals That’s a good passage to come back with. What traditions do you think Paul was referring to here? Do you think he meant any tradition that

@j_bryan_price @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals So “all scripture AND TRADITION is i

@j_bryan_price @TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals So “all scripture AND TRADITION is inspired by God…”? But wouldn’t that be adding to what God said?

@TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals "Real Christians revere relics" 😬 Since "all scrip

@TaylorRMarshall @smashbaals "Real Christians revere relics" 😬 Since "all scripture is inspired by God...so that the man of God may be fully capable, equipped for every good work" (2 Tim 3:16-17) ⎯ w

2 Tim 3:16-17 question

@CovenantReform2 @Name_Unspoken_2 @SHoddeMiller @BethMooreLPM That is not “basic

@CovenantReform2 @Name_Unspoken_2 @SHoddeMiller @BethMooreLPM That is not “basic Bible.” Where does the Bible refer to senior pastor?

1 Cor 14:31 1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Cor 7:1 general

@CovenantReform2 @SHoddeMiller @BethMooreLPM 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the

@CovenantReform2 @SHoddeMiller @BethMooreLPM 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1)—and Paul is refuting it. Paul advocates for all to be able to prophesy and

@gary_groyper @moniemon84 @MillerStream @JonnyRoot_ Well, I think you misunderstand this passage. Paul was stopping false teaching, not women. There was a particular deceived woman who was teaching false doctrine and her husband who wasn’t deceived...

@gary_groyper @moniemon84 @MillerStream @JonnyRoot_ Well, I think you misunderstand this passage. Paul was stopping false teaching, not women. There was a particular deceived woman who was teaching

@RevdBrettMurphy @WATCHChair @leicestercofe @churchofengland It’s not unscriptur

@RevdBrettMurphy @WATCHChair @leicestercofe @churchofengland It’s not unscriptural for a woman to preach true doctrine. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

@EllaFlash @b161750 @TheMuppetPastor They both chose to sin, but Adam was not de

@EllaFlash @b161750 @TheMuppetPastor They both chose to sin, but Adam was not deceived because of his experience with God and observing Him creating prior to Eve who didn’t have this experience. https

@Elle68401613 @piper4missouri @tjs271 The only thing prohibited is the teaching

@Elle68401613 @piper4missouri @tjs271 The only thing prohibited is the teaching of false doctrine. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

@faithwillsaveu @AlfredDolan1 @smashbaals That verse does not restrict all women

@faithwillsaveu @AlfredDolan1 @smashbaals That verse does not restrict all women from teaching, just those teaching false doctrine… https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

@Butch30586594 No, this is referring to a transcription error in Euripides' text

@Butch30586594 No, this is referring to a transcription error in Euripides' text not the Bible.

@Jose287631 @igarglewithfire I appreciate your tone. “This is the brass tacks,

@Jose287631 @igarglewithfire I appreciate your tone. “This is the brass tacks, bottom of the line, bare truth that's imho God inspired.” What, that women cannot preach? That’s what I’m contesting a

@AveryCael @godlywomanhood @pearlythingz If someone has wrong doctrine, they sho

@AveryCael @godlywomanhood @pearlythingz If someone has wrong doctrine, they should be quiet and learn. That’s all Paul was saying in that passage. One learns for the benefit of themselves and other

@DavidCShell1 @Emma41913442572 @p3_1415926i @TnShitStirrer @Eric_Conn What makes you think every Christian believed what you do? Even if all got it wrong, the apostles didn’t. Jesus picked 12 Jewish males but we don’t say only Jewish males can be p...

@DavidCShell1 @Emma41913442572 @p3_1415926i @TnShitStirrer @Eric_Conn What makes you think every Christian believed what you do? Even if all got it wrong, the apostles didn’t. Jesus picked 12 Jewish

@DavidCShell1 @Emma41913442572 @p3_1415926i @TnShitStirrer @Eric_Conn Maybe you

@DavidCShell1 @Emma41913442572 @p3_1415926i @TnShitStirrer @Eric_Conn Maybe you should revisit this passage as it doesn’t teach what you are claiming. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

@godlywomanhood That’s not true. 1 Tim 2:11-15 is referring to a specific deceived woman teaching in the church at Ephesus. Her husband is not deceived and saying nothing—and so this couple is just like the prototypes in Genesis 3. Paul is deali...

@godlywomanhood That’s not true. 1 Tim 2:11-15 is referring to a specific deceived woman teaching in the church at Ephesus. Her husband is not deceived and saying nothing—and so this couple is just

@blklilacc Here’s an explanation of 1 Tim 2:11-15 that might help. Essentially

@blklilacc Here’s an explanation of 1 Tim 2:11-15 that might help. Essentially there’s a deceived woman teaching in the Ephesian church and her husband who isn’t deceived is saying nothing. Because

@godlywomanhood @Eric_Conn That’s not true. Take a look again at 1 Tim 2:11-15.

@godlywomanhood @Eric_Conn That’s not true. Take a look again at 1 Tim 2:11-15. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

@Eric_Conn Preaching is not restricted to males only. Take another look at 1 Ti

@Eric_Conn Preaching is not restricted to males only. Take another look at 1 Tim 2:11-15. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

@DST_QA The 1924 Montgomery Translation did. Translators are affected by bias and have blind spots too. Further, we have Paul explicitly responding to their letter (see 1 Cor 7:1). And if it was not a quote here, it would contradict other parts of ...

@DST_QA The 1924 Montgomery Translation did. Translators are affected by bias and have blind spots too. Further, we have Paul explicitly responding to their letter (see 1 Cor 7:1). And if it was not

1 Cor 7:1 general

@Mormonger 1 Cor 14:34-36 ⎯ Paul refutes Judaizers infiltrating Corinthian churc

@Mormonger 1 Cor 14:34-36 ⎯ Paul refutes Judaizers infiltrating Corinthian church. https://t.co/0UJxaSEb7U

1 Cor 14:34-36 general

@godlyHomeGirl 1 Tim 2:11-12 is Paul dealing with a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine. She has gone off the reservation, but her husband is not deceived yet is not doing anything about it. Since she is deceived, Paul doesn't na...

@godlyHomeGirl 1 Tim 2:11-12 is Paul dealing with a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine. She has gone off the reservation, but her husband is not deceived yet is not doing anything

1 Tim 2:11-12 debate

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Cor 7:1 commentary

@godlyHomeGirl 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to

@godlyHomeGirl 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to Paul (1 Cor 7:1). Paul is refuting this quote from their letter. The "law" refers to the Jewish Oral Traditions in th

@TeregianKunta @AnyineKu @Milly_nassolo Eph 5:23 means that the husband (always

@TeregianKunta @AnyineKu @Milly_nassolo Eph 5:23 means that the husband (always referring back to the original man/wife relationship in Genesis) is the SOURCE of the wife (she came from his bone and f

Eph 5:23 commentary

@TeregianKunta @AnyineKu @Milly_nassolo 1 Tim 2:11-12 is Paul dealing with a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine. She has gone off the reservation, but her husband is not deceived yet is not doing anything about it. Since she is ...

@TeregianKunta @AnyineKu @Milly_nassolo 1 Tim 2:11-12 is Paul dealing with a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine. She has gone off the reservation, but her husband is not deceived

1 Tim 2:11-12 debate

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Cor 7:1 commentary

@TeregianKunta @AnyineKu @Milly_nassolo 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the lette

@TeregianKunta @AnyineKu @Milly_nassolo 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to Paul (1 Cor 7:1). Paul is refuting this quote from their letter. The "law" refers to the Jew

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Cor 7:1 commentary

@Onewhitefrijole @BabuDark1 @NCRonline 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter

@Onewhitefrijole @BabuDark1 @NCRonline 1 Cor 14:34-35 is a quote from the letter from the Corinthians to Paul (1 Cor 7:1). Paul is refuting this quote from their letter. The "law" refers to the Jewi

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-05

@Robert_S_Morley @FredoLives @_nomadic_soul Wow, the British are really good at insulting someone and sounding high class. Reminds me of the smooth sophisticated tripe against the God of the Bible that rolls off the tongue from Richard Dawkins. Nat...

@Robert_S_Morley @FredoLives @_nomadic_soul Wow, the British are really good at insulting someone and sounding high class. Reminds me of the smooth sophisticated tripe against the God of the Bible th

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-04

@Softball_Nani @Robert_S_Morley @KaeleyT I was more disappointed that my pastor

@Softball_Nani @Robert_S_Morley @KaeleyT I was more disappointed that my pastor still met with us even though he admitted he wasn’t feeling 100%. He trusted the mask…

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-04

RT @P_McCulloughMD: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts—T

RT @P_McCulloughMD: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts—Thanks for your strength and courage ⁦@MdBreathe⁩ ⁦@drpaulma…

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-03

@masonmennenga I have to agree with you here. Paul even said: “I wish that all

@masonmennenga I have to agree with you here. Paul even said: “I wish that all of you were as I am” (1 Cor 7:7).

1 Cor 7:7 general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-03

Paul was referring back to the seed of the woman in Gen 3:15. https://t.co/fnwpx

Paul was referring back to the seed of the woman in Gen 3:15. https://t.co/fnwpxeTfM4

Gen 3:15 general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-02

@Rach4Patriarchy How do you define “venerate”? I regard the apostles with respe

@Rach4Patriarchy How do you define “venerate”? I regard the apostles with respect but if I were to create icons of them and pray to them that would cross a line over to things that should only be don

@RichardDawkins To quote Twain about being dead for billions of years before you

@RichardDawkins To quote Twain about being dead for billions of years before you existed is not helping your case because Christians don’t think we existed before our birth. Are you thinking about Mo

@cwierzbicki9 Wrong letter. 1 Tim 2:15. “But she [singular, feminine] will be

@cwierzbicki9 Wrong letter. 1 Tim 2:15. “But she [singular, feminine] will be preserved [future] through the [definite article] childbearing [noun]—if they [plural] continue in faith, love, and sanc

1 Tim 2:15 debate

@cwierzbicki9 Thanks for quoting the passage. The context is the entire letter,

@cwierzbicki9 Thanks for quoting the passage. The context is the entire letter, the author and recipient, the references being made by Paul, the specific terms and grammar Paul uses, etc. If you pic

1 Tim 2:15 commentary

@wendelltalks For those of you wondering how to respond to Richard’s nasty strin

@wendelltalks For those of you wondering how to respond to Richard’s nasty string of allegations about the God if the Bible… https://t.co/hqM5T1J8iH

@JoshuaSethSchu1 @TheOtherPaul2 @RevKimWChafee @DissidentSouth @_matthewpearson

@JoshuaSethSchu1 @TheOtherPaul2 @RevKimWChafee @DissidentSouth @_matthewpearson @KinoCineaste Fair enough.

@AntGrayLiving @skolvikings @KPalms21 @farmingandJesus Many people and cults can say that about many passages. The only way to know whether my interpretation is correct is to test it against the scripture. I’ve worked to take all details in the rel...

@AntGrayLiving @skolvikings @KPalms21 @farmingandJesus Many people and cults can say that about many passages. The only way to know whether my interpretation is correct is to test it against the scri

@ngbswsf5b7 @ministrymisfit @RevKimWChafee FYI, 1 Tim 2:12 is not restricting on

@ngbswsf5b7 @ministrymisfit @RevKimWChafee FYI, 1 Tim 2:12 is not restricting one gender from teaching. In case you are interested. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

1 Tim 2:12 general

@B_Clemethy @VivekGRamaswamy That’s not what that passage means though I complet

@B_Clemethy @VivekGRamaswamy That’s not what that passage means though I completely agree teachers should be qualified and teach true doctrine not false. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

commentary

@William_42318 @LPMisesCaucus @RevJacquiLewis Well, sort of. Except no one shou

@William_42318 @LPMisesCaucus @RevJacquiLewis Well, sort of. Except no one should teach unbiblical things. False doctrine is not gender specific. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

@AntGrayLiving @skolvikings @KPalms21 @farmingandJesus I go through 1 Tim 2:11-1

@AntGrayLiving @skolvikings @KPalms21 @farmingandJesus I go through 1 Tim 2:11-15 thoroughly here. https://t.co/GWXXBQrZnv

@BamaTorch1992 @shawnwood @farmingandJesus @rcberli01 That passage is not restri

@BamaTorch1992 @shawnwood @farmingandJesus @rcberli01 That passage is not restricting women from teaching true doctrine. No one should be teaching false doctrine…that’s not gender specific. https://t