Search — Theology Explorer

Num 30:13 Gen 3:16 debate

@nsraban @CovenantReform2 @smashbaals Yes, Nice find. But Num 30:13 isn’t a law silencing women in the assembly but confirming whether her vow which she speaks is in force and binding. Kind of different. Gen 3:16 is a prophecy to the woman about w...

@nsraban @CovenantReform2 @smashbaals Yes, Nice find. But Num 30:13 isn’t a law silencing women in the assembly but confirming whether her vow which she speaks is in force and binding. Kind of diffe

@AbJrogg @FeralChristineB @Conservative_BC But my brother’s wife’s second cousin

@AbJrogg @FeralChristineB @Conservative_BC But my brother’s wife’s second cousin twice removed is a doctor who did research and published papers on the subject. Oh well…I guess I’ll rip up his resear

@godlywomanhood @Karpouzisporo But in context and the specific grammar, Paul is

@godlywomanhood @Karpouzisporo But in context and the specific grammar, Paul is dealing with a specific situation in this personal letter to Timothy. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

@godlywomanhood Haven’t you noticed all the men who teach error too? It’s not j

@godlywomanhood Haven’t you noticed all the men who teach error too? It’s not just one gender. Take another look. https://t.co/WHlrSQvbxX

@choyMM @Freedom_1961_ @Conservative_BC @pauldirks Maybe let them know the emerg

@choyMM @Freedom_1961_ @Conservative_BC @pauldirks Maybe let them know the emergency is over?

@sfreemanshow @GPalacruz @KelseyMLoo So it’s not about what she’s teaching? If

@sfreemanshow @GPalacruz @KelseyMLoo So it’s not about what she’s teaching? If a donkey taught to do the same thing would it be acceptable? How about if a man taught it?

@choyMM @Freedom_1961_ @Conservative_BC @pauldirks Maybe they didn’t get the mem

@choyMM @Freedom_1961_ @Conservative_BC @pauldirks Maybe they didn’t get the memo?

@samuel_costner @thescottbarber To which Paul responds “What? came the word of G

@samuel_costner @thescottbarber To which Paul responds “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [men] only?”

@uncledando @ChristChurchTe1 @TomBuck Well, what happens to single women who don't have a husband? I think this passage refers to how the wife often sticks with an abusive, controlling husband even though it doesn't make sense. I could be wrong, bu...

@uncledando @ChristChurchTe1 @TomBuck Well, what happens to single women who don't have a husband? I think this passage refers to how the wife often sticks with an abusive, controlling husband even t

@uncledando @ChristChurchTe1 @TomBuck Parents are responsible for children. Onc

@uncledando @ChristChurchTe1 @TomBuck Parents are responsible for children. Once they grow up, they are responsible for themselves.

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek The English translations insert male pronouns likely because of the phrase "one wife husband" but the passage is not intending to say an elder must not be a woman or must not be single or must have children. Ta...

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek The English translations insert male pronouns likely because of the phrase "one wife husband" but the passage is not intending to say an elder must not be a woma

1 Tim 2:15 debate

@uncledando @ChristChurchTe1 @TomBuck In that day, a woman was dependent on her husband to survive. By divorcing his wife, she would be forced to remarry to survive and therefore commit adultery. I am not adding and removing things based on what I ...

@uncledando @ChristChurchTe1 @TomBuck In that day, a woman was dependent on her husband to survive. By divorcing his wife, she would be forced to remarry to survive and therefore commit adultery. I

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek “[Paul] writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Sc...

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek “[Paul] writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant an

2 Peter 3:16 general

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek Can Paul who appoints elders not meet the

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek Can Paul who appoints elders not meet the same standard? He is single and doesn't have children.

@uncledando @ChristChurchTe1 @TomBuck Like Peter acknowledges, “He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort…” (...

@uncledando @ChristChurchTe1 @TomBuck Like Peter acknowledges, “He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understa

2 Pet 3:16 general

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek This view is not my dominant identity. Where are you getting such a claim from? It’s something I’ve been commenting on a lot because it’s causing unnecessary division in the church and I have a problem with th...

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek This view is not my dominant identity. Where are you getting such a claim from? It’s something I’ve been commenting on a lot because it’s causing unnecessary d

@GlennDavies @outcatching @danitreweek “One wife husband” is written in the male form and the default would be to follow the male form but it doesn’t require “must be male” or “must not be female” just like elders are not required to be married and h...

@GlennDavies @outcatching @danitreweek “One wife husband” is written in the male form and the default would be to follow the male form but it doesn’t require “must be male” or “must not be female” jus

1 Tim 3:2 1 Tim 5:9 Tit 1:6 debate

@GlennDavies @outcatching @danitreweek Both forms are used so I summarized as “faithful to one’s spouse”. 1 Tim 3:2,12; Tit 1:6 is the husband form and 1 Tim 5:9 the wife form. The “he’s” are following the default but the male pronoun isn’t there. ...

@GlennDavies @outcatching @danitreweek Both forms are used so I summarized as “faithful to one’s spouse”. 1 Tim 3:2,12; Tit 1:6 is the husband form and 1 Tim 5:9 the wife form. The “he’s” are follow

@Freedom_1961_ @Conservative_BC @pauldirks Bonnie has canceled the order to dete

@Freedom_1961_ @Conservative_BC @pauldirks Bonnie has canceled the order to determine vax status. Doesn’t that mean they cannot require you to disclose your status and therefore no longer discriminat

@GlennDavies @outcatching @danitreweek This is implied. If the person is a man and is married, he must be faithful to his spouse. If married and having kids then must have the kids under control. This does not imply that a person cannot be an elder ...

@GlennDavies @outcatching @danitreweek This is implied. If the person is a man and is married, he must be faithful to his spouse. If married and having kids then must have the kids under control. Thi

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek Again, the apostles are chosen before the church is instituted. Just because men were chosen first doesn’t mean women cannot follow as apostles (though different than the foundational apostles). Just like chur...

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek Again, the apostles are chosen before the church is instituted. Just because men were chosen first doesn’t mean women cannot follow as apostles (though differen

@Conservative_BC @pauldirks Was the announcement on July 14 a secret? https://t

@Conservative_BC @pauldirks Was the announcement on July 14 a secret? https://t.co/iemTTTTAdh https://t.co/fZc4lVbai4

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-09

@GlennDavies @NancyRPearcey So the difference is that patriarchalists (P) assert women are subservient to males and complementarians (C) assert women don’t lead in the family and church because it doesn’t follow God’s order? So P says women are crea...

@GlennDavies @NancyRPearcey So the difference is that patriarchalists (P) assert women are subservient to males and complementarians (C) assert women don’t lead in the family and church because it doe