Search — Theology Explorer

@ronhenzel Yeah, so I really do love Wallace, but it doesn’t mean all his conclusions are right. “A woman” is generic until we hit v14 where we clearly see the anaphoric use of the article. There’s nothing in Wallace’s Greek Grammar Beyond the Basic...

@ronhenzel Yeah, so I really do love Wallace, but it doesn’t mean all his conclusions are right. “A woman” is generic until we hit v14 where we clearly see the anaphoric use of the article. There’s n

@carol66944 Interesting proposition. Where is the “declarative infinitive” discu

@carol66944 Interesting proposition. Where is the “declarative infinitive” discussed in Wallace’s “Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics”?

@ScottCross_8 @ronhenzel @JollyStine @pastherandie @peace_got @ymmotrojam @MikeWingerii What Ron said is disingenuous. He knows that this has nothing to do with beginner Greek. I can even show Dr Wallace saying that the article is not required to poi...

@ScottCross_8 @ronhenzel @JollyStine @pastherandie @peace_got @ymmotrojam @MikeWingerii What Ron said is disingenuous. He knows that this has nothing to do with beginner Greek. I can even show Dr Wall

@ronhenzel @JollyStine @pastherandie @peace_got @ymmotrojam @MikeWingerii From Dr. Wallace in Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: “Most individualizing articles will be anaphoric in a very broad sense. That is, they will be used to point out something t...

@ronhenzel @JollyStine @pastherandie @peace_got @ymmotrojam @MikeWingerii From Dr. Wallace in Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: “Most individualizing articles will be anaphoric in a very broad sense. T

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-08

@Up2Challanges @MikeWingerii I contest Mike's claim I am sinning by my egalitari

@Up2Challanges @MikeWingerii I contest Mike's claim I am sinning by my egalitarian teachings in my response to Tom below. https://t.co/xmm4QIey8Q

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-26

@MallardReborn @Eric_Conn I’m not the one dismissing it. I have extensively comm

@MallardReborn @Eric_Conn I’m not the one dismissing it. I have extensively commented on it explaining everything so that it all fits what Paul has been saying in his letter. If you are not dismissin

commentary

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Only foreign speakers need to consult Greek Lexicons.

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Who is Paul speaking to here when he says “you stand

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Who is Paul speaking to here when he says “you stand by your faith”? And is it not the very same people that he says should fear lest they too may not continue in belief and

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Seems to me you must have some bias such that you wou

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Seems to me you must have some bias such that you would suggest Paul is not intentional with his grammar.

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Paul thought that what he was doing by persecuting this foreign sect without Judaism was what God wanted. The law says that if anyone tells you to worship another god, you should stone him (Deut 13:6-10). When the Lord acc...

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Paul thought that what he was doing by persecuting this foreign sect without Judaism was what God wanted. The law says that if anyone tells you to worship another god, you s

Deut 13:6-10 general

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Yes, Paul was regenerated based on his faith. Everyon

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Yes, Paul was regenerated based on his faith. Everyone without exception is. John the Baptist had the Holy Spirit from before birth, but his salvation too depended on his

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel I don’t know of anyone who says that faith is regener

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel I don’t know of anyone who says that faith is regeneration. Calvinists say regeneration precedes faith, so how can they be the same? Based on scripture, God regenerates bas

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-15

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel You are assuming Calvinism in your response. If God d

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel You are assuming Calvinism in your response. If God decides whether you are elect to faith and therefore salvation, then whether you believe or not is immaterial. Does that

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-12-02

@ronhenzel @HwsEleutheroi If Paul has in mind a template which he uses to interject in a discussion of a particular woman, he most certainly can use the article in this way. I have contacted Wallace in the past...would you like me to reach out to hi...

@ronhenzel @HwsEleutheroi If Paul has in mind a template which he uses to interject in a discussion of a particular woman, he most certainly can use the article in this way. I have contacted Wallace

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-03

@allattwa66533 He defined what marriage is. “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will...

@allattwa66533 He defined what marriage is. “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and

Matthew 19:4 question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-15

@cpa_dallas @William_E_Wolfe That doesn’t need fixing but if they got there desp

@cpa_dallas @William_E_Wolfe That doesn’t need fixing but if they got there despite the Bible, then that’s what needs fixing.

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-11

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek You are the one saying I am infallible, n

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek You are the one saying I am infallible, not me. Fallacy: appeal to authority https://t.co/Er42JjzD1M

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-11

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek Fallacy #1: appeal to authority https://t

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek Fallacy #1: appeal to authority https://t.co/Er42JjzD1M Fallacy #2: argumentum ad populum https://t.co/U4th8NmokL Fallacy #3: ad hominem https://t.co/mlOGSE5Q6

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-23

@L_T_Pearson @AngelaGraceLOU @JustinPetersMin Daniel Wallace differs (if that ma

@L_T_Pearson @AngelaGraceLOU @JustinPetersMin Daniel Wallace differs (if that matters to you). This from Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics, p.396 https://t.co/kxIpmn1X7k

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-23

@Buffalo2Storm @L_T_Pearson @JustinPetersMin Here’s some interesting commentary

@Buffalo2Storm @L_T_Pearson @JustinPetersMin Here’s some interesting commentary on this from Daniel Wallace in Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics suggesting there may be more than 2 authors of Hebrews. h

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-23

@L_T_Pearson @JustinPetersMin Probably the most interesting comments I’ve read a

@L_T_Pearson @JustinPetersMin Probably the most interesting comments I’ve read are from Daniel Wallace in his Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics to suggest there are at least two authors of Hebrews. http

@MarvinMediocre @cpa_dallas @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi If Paul is EXCLUDING

@MarvinMediocre @cpa_dallas @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi If Paul is EXCLUDING all females, then this would need to be explicit.

@cpa_dallas @Aninymouse @HwsEleutheroi Wow!! A synagogue of Satan simply becaus

@cpa_dallas @Aninymouse @HwsEleutheroi Wow!! A synagogue of Satan simply because women are allowed to use the gifting God gave them to preach and teach true doctrine and partake in the responsibility

@MarvinMediocre @cpa_dallas @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi Yes literally written

@MarvinMediocre @cpa_dallas @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi Yes literally written, but it means monogamous (if married) as Paul wasn’t married himself. If an elder must not be female then that needs t

@cpa_dallas @MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi Yes, the Greek is literally “one woman (genitive) man (accusative),” that is that the woman belongs to the man. But this does not 1/ require that an elder must be married as Paul wasn’t marr...

@cpa_dallas @MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi Yes, the Greek is literally “one woman (genitive) man (accusative),” that is that the woman belongs to the man. But this does not 1/ require

@cpa_dallas @MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi But Paul isn’t himsel

@cpa_dallas @MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi But Paul isn’t himself “the husband of one wife.” Can someone who doesn’t meet the requirement himself be in a higher position to appoint th

@MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi I’m sorry, I think I

@MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi I’m sorry, I think I missed this clear point. I’m not interested in what I like or don’t like but what the Bible says and truth. Please hel

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi I’ve read it and studied it carefully. I used to believe as you. The passage in context is not saying women cannot teach men, but ‘a’ woman cannot teach or “take authority” (means murderer, absolute master...

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi I’ve read it and studied it carefully. I used to believe as you. The passage in context is not saying women cannot teach men, but ‘a’ woman cannot teach or

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi If “anyone” (Greek ‘tis’) desires to be an overseer (feminine), they desire a good thing. An overseer (masculine)… The phrase “husband of one wife” is literally “one woman husband” just like it says “one m...

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi If “anyone” (Greek ‘tis’) desires to be an overseer (feminine), they desire a good thing. An overseer (masculine)… The phrase “husband of one wife” is lite

1 Tim 5:9 commentary

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi My wife felt relieved that she didn’t have the responsibility to lead in the home, but I showed her from scripture that we both have that responsibility. She was abdicating her God given responsibility. Sh...

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi My wife felt relieved that she didn’t have the responsibility to lead in the home, but I showed her from scripture that we both have that responsibility. Sh

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi Where does scripture say that man (I take it every man) will answer to God for yielding his ordained position over to women? You mean if I let my wife participate so we make decisions together, God will hol...

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi Where does scripture say that man (I take it every man) will answer to God for yielding his ordained position over to women? You mean if I let my wife parti

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi The reason is given as 1/ Adam was formed first and 2/ Adam was not deceived but Eve was (though he was beside her). So the order and deception are related. This couple in Ephesus had a similar situation, ...

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi The reason is given as 1/ Adam was formed first and 2/ Adam was not deceived but Eve was (though he was beside her). So the order and deception are related.

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi By no means am I suggesting that every woman should be a pastor. It’s a gifting from God and there are requirements. I just don’t think biblically that gender is a requirement for leadership. Women can le...

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi By no means am I suggesting that every woman should be a pastor. It’s a gifting from God and there are requirements. I just don’t think biblically that gen

commentary

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi Then why wasn’t Paul more clear to sa

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi Then why wasn’t Paul more clear to say “an elder must not be a woman”? Why isn’t it very clear as you state? Should a man counsel a woman alone or might it

@davbach823 @cpcwesterville @RickWarren No, that’s called the genetic fallacy. I

@davbach823 @cpcwesterville @RickWarren No, that’s called the genetic fallacy. It doesn’t follow that being egalitarian because of scripture leads to promoting clear sin.