Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (109) Scripture Commentary (109)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-10-10

@ronhenzel @sola_chad The law of noncontradiction applies within a defined system of premises, but the real question is whether your theological system actually reflects what Scripture teaches. Claiming other interpretations are inconsistent simply ...

@ronhenzel @sola_chad The law of noncontradiction applies within a defined system of premises, but the real question is whether your theological system actually reflects what Scripture teaches. Claim

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-09-16

@Dundada63093 @davidmn316 @restoredkgdm @rightresponsem That’s not exactly true because Roman Catholicism also introduces a lot of errors which distract from the gospel. Back to the topic: scripture teaches that God gave government the responsibilit...

@Dundada63093 @davidmn316 @restoredkgdm @rightresponsem That’s not exactly true because Roman Catholicism also introduces a lot of errors which distract from the gospel. Back to the topic: scripture

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-09-15

@prot_zoomer @restoredkgdm @rightresponsem First, if Paul was just getting what was due to him, why was it that all the apostles were martyred except John, who purportedly only survived the martyrdom attempt? And why didn’t Jesus stone the woman cau...

@prot_zoomer @restoredkgdm @rightresponsem First, if Paul was just getting what was due to him, why was it that all the apostles were martyred except John, who purportedly only survived the martyrdom

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-09-15

@restoredkgdm @rightresponsem I’m not questioning scripture. I’m questioning you

@restoredkgdm @rightresponsem I’m not questioning scripture. I’m questioning your insistence that mercy is not a consideration. Why wasn’t the woman caught in the act of adultery stoned? Why didn’t J

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-09-14

@trumpidolater @rightresponsem I’m glad you believe that it’s not the role of the church to carry the sword. Back in medieval times it did. Government should carry out punishment according to the law, but when the victim’s family forgives the repent...

@trumpidolater @rightresponsem I’m glad you believe that it’s not the role of the church to carry the sword. Back in medieval times it did. Government should carry out punishment according to the law

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-08-12

@DanielT46640724 @BertinMbokish @SocietyOfStChad @BishopJaxi Drinking the blood of a human or animal was expressly forbidden in the law. “It is a permanent statute throughout your generations in all your dwellings: you shall not eat any fat nor any ...

@DanielT46640724 @BertinMbokish @SocietyOfStChad @BishopJaxi Drinking the blood of a human or animal was expressly forbidden in the law. “It is a permanent statute throughout your generations in all

Lev 3:17 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-08-12

@DanielT46640724 @BertinMbokish @SocietyOfStChad @BishopJaxi Jesus is not bread just like He is not a door. The Levitical priesthood does not continue into the NT church. Fulfilling the law doesn’t mean that the sacrificial system continues. It sto...

@DanielT46640724 @BertinMbokish @SocietyOfStChad @BishopJaxi Jesus is not bread just like He is not a door. The Levitical priesthood does not continue into the NT church. Fulfilling the law doesn’t

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-09

@carol66944 @KennethOrtiz @BronWen727104 @Paula_333 1Co 9:9 “You shall not muzzle an ox…” 1Co 9:13-14 Temple workers eat from temple offerings forming the basis for the direction that those who proclaim the gospel should get their living from it. Pa...

@carol66944 @KennethOrtiz @BronWen727104 @Paula_333 1Co 9:9 “You shall not muzzle an ox…” 1Co 9:13-14 Temple workers eat from temple offerings forming the basis for the direction that those who procla

1Co 9:13-14 1Co 9:9 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-09

@carol66944 @KennethOrtiz @BronWen727104 @Paula_333 So you think the law is: “If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church” (14:35)? Where does the law ...

@carol66944 @KennethOrtiz @BronWen727104 @Paula_333 So you think the law is: “If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-09

@carol66944 @KennethOrtiz @BronWen727104 @Paula_333 “…what I am writing is the Lord’s command” —but this is not v34-35. If it was, it would be in the law (Gen—Deut) and there is no law that silences women in the assembly. But it is part of the oral t...

@carol66944 @KennethOrtiz @BronWen727104 @Paula_333 “…what I am writing is the Lord’s command” —but this is not v34-35. If it was, it would be in the law (Gen—Deut) and there is no law that silences w

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-08

@RobertMacD0nald @purebredslappy That has nothing to do with the church though. I’m not saying that the police have no authority to arrest me if I disobey the law. But my pastor has no authority to tell me what to do or not to do, only scripture has ...

@RobertMacD0nald @purebredslappy That has nothing to do with the church though. I’m not saying that the police have no authority to arrest me if I disobey the law. But my pastor has no authority to te

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-11

@biblemarriages @yallbenonsense @MikeWingerii The law didn’t explicitly specify or regulate a woman divorcing her husband nor did it forbid her. Silence doesn’t mean that she doesn’t also have the right to divorce an unfaithful husband. Do you belie...

@biblemarriages @yallbenonsense @MikeWingerii The law didn’t explicitly specify or regulate a woman divorcing her husband nor did it forbid her. Silence doesn’t mean that she doesn’t also have the rig

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-11

@biblemarriages @yallbenonsense @MikeWingerii No, the explicit statement is that

@biblemarriages @yallbenonsense @MikeWingerii No, the explicit statement is that her foolish vows can be annulled without her suffering the consequences which is a grace. This is not about having auth

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-11

@biblemarriages @yallbenonsense @MikeWingerii The law does not forbid women from

@biblemarriages @yallbenonsense @MikeWingerii The law does not forbid women from divorcing their husbands so what Jesus said was definitely not in contradiction to the law. So your conclusions are no

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-11

@biblemarriages @yallbenonsense @MikeWingerii Jesus simply assumed that a woman may divorce her husband and if she does then He said what was permissible. Jesus is the law giver and the Word so He most certainly can bring clarity to the intent of the...

@biblemarriages @yallbenonsense @MikeWingerii Jesus simply assumed that a woman may divorce her husband and if she does then He said what was permissible. Jesus is the law giver and the Word so He mos

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-02

@DefiantLs 6. Jesus was a total rebel in His time. MISLEADING. He was not a rebel in these ways: - He paid taxes (Mt 22:21). - He submitted to civil authorities (Jn 19:11). - He obeyed the Law of Moses (Mt 5:17). - He told others to do what the Pha...

@DefiantLs 6. Jesus was a total rebel in His time. MISLEADING. He was not a rebel in these ways: - He paid taxes (Mt 22:21). - He submitted to civil authorities (Jn 19:11). - He obeyed the Law of Mo

Jn 19:11 Mt 22:21 Mt 23:3 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-12

@BeardedPresby @smashbaals Hm, I see. So Ezra read the law from morning until ni

@BeardedPresby @smashbaals Hm, I see. So Ezra read the law from morning until night (Ne 8:2–3, 8). So is that what they do at your church? Your hired pastor reads the Bible for hours from the pulpit?

Ne 8:2 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-18

@BronWen727104 Could be. Though in 1Ti 1 where Paul introduces the strange doctrines, he refers to myths and genealogies and fruitless discussions about the law. I’m not sure what that has to do with Artemis. 1Ti 2:9 refers to elaborate hair—likely a...

@BronWen727104 Could be. Though in 1Ti 1 where Paul introduces the strange doctrines, he refers to myths and genealogies and fruitless discussions about the law. I’m not sure what that has to do with

1Ti 2:9 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-14

@Vibeauxs @smashbaals Yes I understand the law. It says you are not guilty in sp

@Vibeauxs @smashbaals Yes I understand the law. It says you are not guilty in specific circumstances, but not all circumstances. Even if the apostles’ families were not attacked you’d think they woul

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-08

@GregCha67942091 @sparkobuzzer @Ashleyhays2089 You are doing the same thing that the scribes and teachers of the law did with the prophecies about Jesus’ coming. They saw only one coming of the messiah to rule and completely missed His first. Similar...

@GregCha67942091 @sparkobuzzer @Ashleyhays2089 You are doing the same thing that the scribes and teachers of the law did with the prophecies about Jesus’ coming. They saw only one coming of the messia

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-10-10

@ministrymisfit @JosiahHawthorne @pastherandie @JayMallow3 How was I spreading misinformation? Even if I was, a link to the law or an article showing how tight the voting regulations are should help anyone who thinks I’m right to draw the correct con...

@ministrymisfit @JosiahHawthorne @pastherandie @JayMallow3 How was I spreading misinformation? Even if I was, a link to the law or an article showing how tight the voting regulations are should help a

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-09-27

@TebzSmith @Vee851010577151 @dalepartridge That’s because the religious leaders didn’t let them in. "Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. You yourselves do not e...

@TebzSmith @Vee851010577151 @dalepartridge That’s because the religious leaders didn’t let them in. "Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of

Mt 23:13 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-09-26

@LostinAusten27 @taylorsschumann The laws concerning what one wears, eats and special days and seasons is done away with in Christ. Concerning morality, this depends on the government. Those who claim to be believers but who practice immorality, are...

@LostinAusten27 @taylorsschumann The laws concerning what one wears, eats and special days and seasons is done away with in Christ. Concerning morality, this depends on the government. Those who clai

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-09-20

@AboutLungCancer @masonmennenga Further, I want to clarify that it is not possible to obey the law to become right before God! You have to acknowledge that you have failed, repent and then ask God for forgiveness. Then put your trust in Him, read you...

@AboutLungCancer @masonmennenga Further, I want to clarify that it is not possible to obey the law to become right before God! You have to acknowledge that you have failed, repent and then ask God for

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-09-20

@TracyWelborn6 Well, I just find it curious that what you believe is very similar to Mormon teaching… "Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy." (2 Nephi 2:25). "The fall of man came as a blessing in disguise... Had Adam...

@TracyWelborn6 Well, I just find it curious that what you believe is very similar to Mormon teaching… "Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy." (2 Nephi 2:25). "The fall

2 Nephi 2:25 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-07-31

@RenOfMen We are not supposed to subjugate another human against their will. Of

@RenOfMen We are not supposed to subjugate another human against their will. Of course if they violate the law of the land, we do this regularly. However, a husband is never to do that to his wife!

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-07-04

@JoeAdrian256 @ingersoll_bob @MikeWingerii @magnabosco First, the fact that you are not convinced is totally fine! Your comment about “teachers of the law” and splitting hairs seems odd. The law is specific about what God requires so you are not sin...

@JoeAdrian256 @ingersoll_bob @MikeWingerii @magnabosco First, the fact that you are not convinced is totally fine! Your comment about “teachers of the law” and splitting hairs seems odd. The law is s

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-06-03

@EvansWalt_human @smashbaals I don’t recall Jesus and the apostles running the g

@EvansWalt_human @smashbaals I don’t recall Jesus and the apostles running the government and making all the laws Christian either. They got killed for proclaiming Christ and not forcibly making the

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-07

@GarOHoff @StanfieldBrent1 @Robert_S_Morley @ronhenzel @Idolkiller Jesus was exe

@GarOHoff @StanfieldBrent1 @Robert_S_Morley @ronhenzel @Idolkiller Jesus was executed for his claim to be the Son of God which the teachers of the law said made Him equal with God.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-03

@NBidnz I'm not sure I've heard angels referred to as spies before, but you are right that Judiazers especially were infiltrating the churches and trying to bring them under the law (see Galatians). The thing about angels and head coverings is that ...

@NBidnz I'm not sure I've heard angels referred to as spies before, but you are right that Judiazers especially were infiltrating the churches and trying to bring them under the law (see Galatians).

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@ymmotrojam @JosiahHawthorne Tom, the point was that assuming your view was correct, your complaint that I wasn't being consistent applies also to you. Your claim was that Paul has to use "the law" in a consistent manner. If your claim that the way P...

@ymmotrojam @JosiahHawthorne Tom, the point was that assuming your view was correct, your complaint that I wasn't being consistent applies also to you. Your claim was that Paul has to use "the law" in

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@ymmotrojam Tom, you are the one that said if I was not interpreting the law the same way then I wasn’t being consistent. I merely noted that Paul as the author is the one who determines how he is using the term. And in 1Co 7:1 he tells us he is resp...

@ymmotrojam Tom, you are the one that said if I was not interpreting the law the same way then I wasn’t being consistent. I merely noted that Paul as the author is the one who determines how he is usi

1Co 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@ymmotrojam Where is there a general principle in the law that women must submit

@ymmotrojam Where is there a general principle in the law that women must submit (separately from men) when in a gathering?

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@ymmotrojam Please show me this hermeneutical law that forbids Paul from quoting from the law (and providing the reference) and then quoting from the Judiazers in the letter from the Corinthians who reference the law without any clear reference? Thes...

@ymmotrojam Please show me this hermeneutical law that forbids Paul from quoting from the law (and providing the reference) and then quoting from the Judiazers in the letter from the Corinthians who r

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-19

@AsherJacob23060 @ronhenzel This is a good point⎯Paul doesn't say "the law says"

@AsherJacob23060 @ronhenzel This is a good point⎯Paul doesn't say "the law says" or that sort of thing. I believe it is because Paul is providing backup for young single Timothy as he was about to get

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-16

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Paul thought that what he was doing by persecuting this foreign sect without Judaism was what God wanted. The law says that if anyone tells you to worship another god, you should stone him (Deut 13:6-10). When the Lord acc...

@Jgallagher1958 @ronhenzel Paul thought that what he was doing by persecuting this foreign sect without Judaism was what God wanted. The law says that if anyone tells you to worship another god, you s

Deut 13:6-10 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-10

@TWFtrish @ronhenzel @SindlandOz34748 @NBidnz Paul wasn’t writing Romans to an individual or just the leadership, but the whole congregation. He was dealing with issues surrounding the relationship of the law, the gospel and Christian liberty and iss...

@TWFtrish @ronhenzel @SindlandOz34748 @NBidnz Paul wasn’t writing Romans to an individual or just the leadership, but the whole congregation. He was dealing with issues surrounding the relationship of

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-14

@ronhenzel Oh, so you actually do believe that this text demonstrates Total Inability just that it doesn't teach it? Seems a minor difference, don't you think? Deut 10:16 + Deut 30:6 are actually my favourite combination of passages in the law showi...

@ronhenzel Oh, so you actually do believe that this text demonstrates Total Inability just that it doesn't teach it? Seems a minor difference, don't you think? Deut 10:16 + Deut 30:6 are actually my

Deut 10:16 Deut 30:6 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-04

@Nathanor582613 @WomnOfValor Thanks for the comment. - Paul is clearly responding to the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1). Since there are no quotes in the original manuscripts, how do we know where Paul is quoting? - Paul refers to the l...

@Nathanor582613 @WomnOfValor Thanks for the comment. - Paul is clearly responding to the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1). Since there are no quotes in the original manuscripts, how do we

1 Cor 7:1 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-03

@smashbaals Women are unqualified by an immutable characteristic? This sounds like going back to slavery to the law… "It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery." (Gal 5...

@smashbaals Women are unqualified by an immutable characteristic? This sounds like going back to slavery to the law… "It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do

Gal 5:1 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-02

@MarkGrote @Peacemaker811 @HbitsO @BethMooreLPM This assumes authentein means “usurp authority”—are men allowed to do that but women are not? Men are allowed hostile takeovers inspired by geneologies and false understanding of the law? Paul wasn’t ...

@MarkGrote @Peacemaker811 @HbitsO @BethMooreLPM This assumes authentein means “usurp authority”—are men allowed to do that but women are not? Men are allowed hostile takeovers inspired by geneologies

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-05

@SadieMills19 @The_Wry_Griot @smashbaals Regarding the part from the commentary you provided regarding the law reference. Genesis 3:16 is not a commandment ("shall rule" is not in the imperative), it was spoken to the woman (so God wasn't giving Ada...

@SadieMills19 @The_Wry_Griot @smashbaals Regarding the part from the commentary you provided regarding the law reference. Genesis 3:16 is not a commandment ("shall rule" is not in the imperative), it

Genesis 3:16 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-14

@Sentinel_VA @smashbaals @TheJaredian Yes, the laws related to clean and unclean foods do not apply to believers after the resurrection of Jesus. However, Paul took a Nazarite vow in the New Testament (Acts 18:18; 21:23-26). He did this post-resurr...

@Sentinel_VA @smashbaals @TheJaredian Yes, the laws related to clean and unclean foods do not apply to believers after the resurrection of Jesus. However, Paul took a Nazarite vow in the New Testamen

Acts 18:18 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-02

@M_Jensen23 @aflawedmanofGod @ortrails @goteamcarr There is a certain patriarchal structure that seems to be inherent in the Old Testament and the law that is different from the man ruling over the woman. I believe the patriarchy we see was a result...

@M_Jensen23 @aflawedmanofGod @ortrails @goteamcarr There is a certain patriarchal structure that seems to be inherent in the Old Testament and the law that is different from the man ruling over the wo

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-28

@thunk_huda The reference to the law is part of the quote from what the Corinthians wrote. There were Judiazers infiltrating many of the churches at that time. The “law” is not found in scripture but in the Talmud which Jews consider the oral law—b...

@thunk_huda The reference to the law is part of the quote from what the Corinthians wrote. There were Judiazers infiltrating many of the churches at that time. The “law” is not found in scripture bu

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-20

@DickSaban1 @aflawedmanofGod @ortrails @goteamcarr You are not reading Isaiah 3:12 in context (see below). What Paul says is consistent with his other letters. Yes, only male Levites were the only ones allowed to be priests as that is what was in t...

@DickSaban1 @aflawedmanofGod @ortrails @goteamcarr You are not reading Isaiah 3:12 in context (see below). What Paul says is consistent with his other letters. Yes, only male Levites were the only o

Isaiah 3:12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-15

@William_E_Wolfe The law amendment is divisive. How is he shaming and slanderin

@William_E_Wolfe The law amendment is divisive. How is he shaming and slandering? Am I missing something? The SBC needs to stop being so divisive on secondary issues. There is no list of sins in w

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-15

@PastorTSheppard @Jgrey2003 @pastordmack Where is the law in the Bible that women were to be “completely silent” in the congregation? It doesn’t say “women should not lead” but “women should remain silent” and the reason that speaking in the assembl...

@PastorTSheppard @Jgrey2003 @pastordmack Where is the law in the Bible that women were to be “completely silent” in the congregation? It doesn’t say “women should not lead” but “women should remain s

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-13

@Jgrey2003 @PastorTSheppard @pastordmack Why do you think it is wrong? Paul is responding to the letter from the Corinthians (1 Cor 7:1). The statement in 1 Cor 14:34-35 contradicts the inclusivity of the rest of the chapter (see v31). The referen...

@Jgrey2003 @PastorTSheppard @pastordmack Why do you think it is wrong? Paul is responding to the letter from the Corinthians (1 Cor 7:1). The statement in 1 Cor 14:34-35 contradicts the inclusivity

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Cor 7:1 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-10

@DST_QA "...the women are to keep silent in the churches; for they are not permitted to speak, but are to subject themselves, just as the Law also says." (v34) This is saying that the Law "also" says the same thing as summarized previously. Where d...

@DST_QA "...the women are to keep silent in the churches; for they are not permitted to speak, but are to subject themselves, just as the Law also says." (v34) This is saying that the Law "also" says

debate
← Prev Page 2 of 3 Next →