Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (10562) Scripture Commentary (10562)
Scripture Commentary debate point

> “…Mary has chosen the good portion, which will not be taken away from her. ”  Luke 10:41-42

[counterargument] From: Men Taken Womens Good Portion

counterargument
Scripture Commentary debate point

The question has come up on this blog about whether Adam had a sin nature at the fall that would have been passed on to all of us, and if this is an issue that is important regarding women in ministry. After all, we need to know why it is that only Adam would bring sin into the world and if all of u

[general] From: Sin Nature Through Man

general
Scripture Commentary debate point

On Sunday, March 21, 2010, a meeting was held to determine the fate of principal John Hartwig who had been suspended  earlier for engaging in conduct “unbecoming a called worker”. The Baraboo News Republic in Baraboo, Wisconsin documents the letter that was sent to school parents that announced Hart

[general] From: Principal Fired

general
Scripture Commentary debate point

I started a post months ago and then life became so complicated I had to set my blog aside to cope. This post will now be the new “home” on the discussion on whether 1 Timothy 2:12 has two prohibitions or one

[counterargument] From: 1 Timothy 212 Prohibitions Revisited

counterargument
Scripture Commentary debate point

Phil Johnson over at Pyromaniacs has struck up some heat on a post that he titles “The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of the Discernment Divas”. In this post and in his subsequent comments he makes his position plain that women are not allowed to publicly point out an erro

[complementarian_objection] From: Phil Johnson Monstrous Divas

complementarian_objection
Scripture Commentary debate point

## What did God intend at creation

[counterargument] From: Creation Rule

counterargument
Scripture Commentary debate point

Hypotasso in v21 paired with allelon (one to another) is explicitly reciprocal. A hierarchy has a top and bottom; allelon hypotasso has neither.

[egalitarian_argument] From: Eph 5:22 and Mutual Submission

egalitarian_argument
Scripture Commentary debate point

V22 borrows its verb from v21, so the submission in view for wives must be the same kind: voluntary, mutual, self-giving, not one-directional hierarchy.

[egalitarian_argument] From: Eph 5:22 and Mutual Submission

egalitarian_argument
Scripture Commentary debate point

Reading v22 as a hierarchy command breaks the semantic logic Paul established in v21. Two categorically different concepts cannot share the same governing verb.

[egalitarian_argument] From: Eph 5:22 and Mutual Submission

egalitarian_argument
Scripture Commentary debate point

Kephale in v23 means source, grounding marriage in Gen 2 as symbolic definition, not asserting a modern husband is the ontological origin of his wife.

[egalitarian_argument] From: Eph 5:22 and Mutual Submission

egalitarian_argument
Scripture Commentary debate point

Php 2:3-5 applies self-giving posture to all believers. Paul calls husbands to join what was already everyone's calling.

[egalitarian_argument] From: Eph 5:22 and Mutual Submission

egalitarian_argument
Scripture Commentary debate point

Eph 5:22 instructs wives to submit to husbands, implying a hierarchical authority structure in marriage.

[complementarian_objection] From: Eph 5:22 and Mutual Submission

complementarian_objection
← Prev Page 212 of 212 Next →