Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (1305) Scripture Commentary (1305)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-05

@d6project @haymes_joshua Paul indicates that the deceived woman wasn’t saved wh

@d6project @haymes_joshua Paul indicates that the deceived woman wasn’t saved who was teaching in Ephesus by his statement “She will be saved if…”

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-05

@Protestia Wow, this is not exegetical, nor does it take into consideration the stated purpose of this letter from Paul, his grammar and the context and references he uses. She appears to be a deceived woman whom is similar to the one Paul spoke abo...

@Protestia Wow, this is not exegetical, nor does it take into consideration the stated purpose of this letter from Paul, his grammar and the context and references he uses. She appears to be a deceiv

1 Tim 2:11-15 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-05

@haymes_joshua @Robert_S_Morley Qualified and gifted women are not prevented fro

@haymes_joshua @Robert_S_Morley Qualified and gifted women are not prevented from teaching the truth. The example you shared was that of a woman teaching error.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-05

@haymes_joshua The problem here is not that she’s a woman but that she’s teachin

@haymes_joshua The problem here is not that she’s a woman but that she’s teaching how to use the Bible to divine a message and interpret dreams. She doesn’t read the Bible to understand God’s intende

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-01

@RedBeardthePat @smashbaals Yes, the man was created first and was the source of the woman, his wife. This has nothing to do with authority and everything to do with equality—they are one flesh. And you claim I’m rejecting scripture and inventing a...

@RedBeardthePat @smashbaals Yes, the man was created first and was the source of the woman, his wife. This has nothing to do with authority and everything to do with equality—they are one flesh. And

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-30

Exposition of 1 Cor 11:3. Paul explains that the "head" of every man is Christ, the man is the "head" of a woman and God is the "head" of Christ. "Head" in this context means source or origin, as this is confirmed in vs 12: "For as the woman origina...

Exposition of 1 Cor 11:3. Paul explains that the "head" of every man is Christ, the man is the "head" of a woman and God is the "head" of Christ. "Head" in this context means source or origin, as thi

1 Cor 11:3 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-27

@thee_ppd @BenZeisloft That was Paul dealing with those who said you had to be circumcised to be saved. Read what Paul said to the women. Paul advises women to focus on inner godliness rather than external adornment. He suggests that a woman's true...

@thee_ppd @BenZeisloft That was Paul dealing with those who said you had to be circumcised to be saved. Read what Paul said to the women. Paul advises women to focus on inner godliness rather than e

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-24

@Manda2364333130 @Brian_Sauve Not so. Gen 3:16 was spoken to the woman, not the man, and it wasn’t an imperative and the tense allows for future fulfillment (a prophecy). We have been told so many times that God ordained males to lead that we think...

@Manda2364333130 @Brian_Sauve Not so. Gen 3:16 was spoken to the woman, not the man, and it wasn’t an imperative and the tense allows for future fulfillment (a prophecy). We have been told so many t

Gen 3:16 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-20

@MariusM38610501 @MikeWingerii Also, Paul isn’t talking about women bearing chil

@MariusM38610501 @MikeWingerii Also, Paul isn’t talking about women bearing children but about “the (definite) chidbearing (noun).” How does this reference to the seed of the woman have anything to d

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-20

@EtAbundatGratia @JayMuratore @MikeWingerii It is eisegesis or confirmation bias to read into Gen 3:16 that she desires to rule her husband. Gen 4:7 is a different context. Sin is not a person, but metaphorically, if sin wants Cain perhaps like a w...

@EtAbundatGratia @JayMuratore @MikeWingerii It is eisegesis or confirmation bias to read into Gen 3:16 that she desires to rule her husband. Gen 4:7 is a different context. Sin is not a person, but

Gen 3:16 Gen 4:7 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-20

@EtAbundatGratia @JayMuratore @MikeWingerii @ryanshatz God’s design which ends at day 7 shows no evidence of the man being given the command to rule over the wife, but that they are to rule together over creation. This is an imperative plural in Gen...

@EtAbundatGratia @JayMuratore @MikeWingerii @ryanshatz God’s design which ends at day 7 shows no evidence of the man being given the command to rule over the wife, but that they are to rule together o

Gen 1:28 Gen 3:16 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-20

@JayMuratore @MikeWingerii But how do you know what her desire is from that? Perhaps what God is saying is that despite her mistreatment, she will still desire her husband. This is played out time and time again with abusive husbands. You wonder w...

@JayMuratore @MikeWingerii But how do you know what her desire is from that? Perhaps what God is saying is that despite her mistreatment, she will still desire her husband. This is played out time a

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-14

"It is for this reason that a woman ought to have authority over her own head, b

"It is for this reason that a woman ought to have authority over her own head, because of the angels" (1 Cor 11:10, NIV). What does "because of the angels" mean? Share your view in the comments!

1 Cor 11:10 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-14

@JakobFel @BenZeisloft @smashbaals No, that’s not it either. But you are right it’s in the context. Here’s the ISV: 1 Corinthians 11:14–15 (ISV): “Nature itself teaches you **NEITHER** that it is disgraceful for a man to have long hair **NOR** tha...

@JakobFel @BenZeisloft @smashbaals No, that’s not it either. But you are right it’s in the context. Here’s the ISV: 1 Corinthians 11:14–15 (ISV): “Nature itself teaches you **NEITHER** that it is d

1 Corinthians 11:14 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-14

@DavePosMil @smashbaals What…this Bible? 1 Corinthians 11:14–15 (ISV): “Nature

@DavePosMil @smashbaals What…this Bible? 1 Corinthians 11:14–15 (ISV): “Nature itself teaches you **NEITHER** that it is disgraceful for a man to have long hair **NOR** that hair is a woman’s glory,

1 Corinthians 11:14 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-14

@raydon02 @smashbaals The issue was concerning head coverings primarily because a married woman with an unbelieving Jewish husband may be perceived as promiscuous if she uncovered her head in public. Everyone was to have an uncovered head while pray...

@raydon02 @smashbaals The issue was concerning head coverings primarily because a married woman with an unbelieving Jewish husband may be perceived as promiscuous if she uncovered her head in public.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-13

@DivinaSilentium @sanothomas That passage is referring to a specific woman in Ep

@DivinaSilentium @sanothomas That passage is referring to a specific woman in Ephesus who was teaching false doctrine such that she had left orthodoxy. But it doesn’t apply to a woman teaching the tr

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-11

@BibleBashed Every woman you refer to as damaged goods was damaged by a man. Wh

@BibleBashed Every woman you refer to as damaged goods was damaged by a man. Which is worse? The damaged or the one doing the damage?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-11

As many of you rightly noted, Genesis 1:26-27 is unequivocal that both the man and the woman are created in God's image. Let's take a look at this passage again to make this certain. Before we do, in Gen 5:2, we are told that "[God] created them ma...

As many of you rightly noted, Genesis 1:26-27 is unequivocal that both the man and the woman are created in God's image. Let's take a look at this passage again to make this certain. Before we do, i

Gen 5:2 Genesis 1:26-27 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-09

@__Layman__ @JulieCobbe Adam was created with a need (he was alone). The woman was created to fulfill his need perfectly. Paul is speaking in relation to the creation order itself. Once woman was created, we may say that both men and women are an ...

@__Layman__ @JulieCobbe Adam was created with a need (he was alone). The woman was created to fulfill his need perfectly. Paul is speaking in relation to the creation order itself. Once woman was c

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-08

@RealCaloJones @KeturahAbigail Not so. Paul was referring to a specific woman w

@RealCaloJones @KeturahAbigail Not so. Paul was referring to a specific woman who was teaching heresy, not women who are commenting on X and definitely not women who are teaching the truth! https://t

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-08

@biblethumperr @autocorrect2_0 You are taking that passage out of context. It’s

@biblethumperr @autocorrect2_0 You are taking that passage out of context. It’s dealing with a specific woman teaching false doctrine, not with women who are teaching the truth. https://t.co/rBGS8Fof

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-08

@sanothomas In the case of 1 Tim 2:11-15, Paul is dealing with a specific situat

@sanothomas In the case of 1 Tim 2:11-15, Paul is dealing with a specific situation of a woman who is teaching false doctrine. He is not telling Timothy to stop women from teaching true doctrine. htt

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-06

@ArmoryOC @Brian_Sauve “A woman” not “all women.” Paul was dealing with a specific situation of a deceived woman who was ignorant but who was no longer in the faith. She was teaching heresy and her husband who wasn’t deceived was not speaking up. ...

@ArmoryOC @Brian_Sauve “A woman” not “all women.” Paul was dealing with a specific situation of a deceived woman who was ignorant but who was no longer in the faith. She was teaching heresy and her

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-06

@ArmoryOC @Brian_Sauve Not every woman had a husband or perhaps even a living fa

@ArmoryOC @Brian_Sauve Not every woman had a husband or perhaps even a living father…or one that lived near them. I guess they were out of luck or had to borrow someone else’s husband or forced them

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-05

@BibleBashed I’m shocked that over 50% of respondents so far think women need to have children to be saved‼️ "She [singular] will be saved [future, so cannot be Eve] through the childbearing [definite article + noun, NOT a verb, a reference back to ...

@BibleBashed I’m shocked that over 50% of respondents so far think women need to have children to be saved‼️ "She [singular] will be saved [future, so cannot be Eve] through the childbearing [definit

Gen 3:15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-05

@YouMayCallMeV1 @DickSaban1 @BibleBashed I never said that. I said there is more involved here than just the woman, but Dadbod is targeting women using a text that seems to implicate the man (likely due to the patriarchal nature of the culture at th...

@YouMayCallMeV1 @DickSaban1 @BibleBashed I never said that. I said there is more involved here than just the woman, but Dadbod is targeting women using a text that seems to implicate the man (likely

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-05

@doomsdayslam @CruzControl72 @OrderChristian That verse is not a generic prohibi

@doomsdayslam @CruzControl72 @OrderChristian That verse is not a generic prohibition of all woman but applies to a specific deceived woman teaching false doctrine at the church at Ephesus. https://t.c

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-04

@LadyDemosthenes @OPRisely @pgklee @mark_petereit That passage in Timothy—vs 11-15⎯ is addressing a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine, and her husband who is not deceived but silent—just like their prototypes, Eve and Adam. I su...

@LadyDemosthenes @OPRisely @pgklee @mark_petereit That passage in Timothy—vs 11-15⎯ is addressing a specific deceived woman who is teaching false doctrine, and her husband who is not deceived but sile

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-04

@Rach4Patriarchy Wow, those are crazy responses. Whatever happened to doing bot

@Rach4Patriarchy Wow, those are crazy responses. Whatever happened to doing both like the virtuous woman in Proverbs 31 who seems to have left nothing for her husband to do?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-03

@DickSaban1 @Peacemaker811 @PubliusJosephus You are just assuming your opinion. I have shown over and over that you are misconstruing the meaning of those texts. Then assuming your conclusion you assume Priscilla cannot teach a man. But it is very...

@DickSaban1 @Peacemaker811 @PubliusJosephus You are just assuming your opinion. I have shown over and over that you are misconstruing the meaning of those texts. Then assuming your conclusion you as

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-03

@Robert_S_Morley @BogdanOancea77 Yes, when considering all that this woman does

@Robert_S_Morley @BogdanOancea77 Yes, when considering all that this woman does and achieves, one wonders whether there is anything left for her husband to do!

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-03

@elizabethprata @pastorpilgrim @Lily_Warrior @aimeebyrdPYW @JJumping @ajjumping God is also a helper and that doesn’t mean He is underneath our authority. The creation order has to do with deception, not authority. There is no hierarchy displayed i...

@elizabethprata @pastorpilgrim @Lily_Warrior @aimeebyrdPYW @JJumping @ajjumping God is also a helper and that doesn’t mean He is underneath our authority. The creation order has to do with deception,

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-03

@elizabethprata @Lily_Warrior @pastorpilgrim @aimeebyrdPYW @JJumping @ajjumping The reference to creation was to show that Adam and Eve were prototypes of this couple in Ephesus. The woman is deceived and ignorant and teaching false doctrine, but th...

@elizabethprata @Lily_Warrior @pastorpilgrim @aimeebyrdPYW @JJumping @ajjumping The reference to creation was to show that Adam and Eve were prototypes of this couple in Ephesus. The woman is deceive

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-03

@elizabethprata @the_punk_god Wow, where did you get that? Surely not from 1 Ti

@elizabethprata @the_punk_god Wow, where did you get that? Surely not from 1 Tim 2:12! That has to do with a specific deceived woman in Ephesus teaching false doctrine. Where is anyone EVER in sin

1 Tim 2:12 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-03

@BogdanOancea77 Slide #1: Need I remind you of what Proverbs 31 claims the virtuous woman does: - Her husband trusts in her - She works with her hands find wool and linen and then runs the clothing manufacturing by her own hand - She puts bread on t...

@BogdanOancea77 Slide #1: Need I remind you of what Proverbs 31 claims the virtuous woman does: - Her husband trusts in her - She works with her hands find wool and linen and then runs the clothing m

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-02

@MozzieStark Hmm. You may want to re-read these passages. Starting with 1 Tim

@MozzieStark Hmm. You may want to re-read these passages. Starting with 1 Tim 2:12, this is about a deceived woman in Ephesus teaching false doctrine. Paul is stopping anyone from teaching the trut

1 Tim 2:12 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-02

@OBXnationalism Being a woman in and of itself doesn’t disqualify someone. 1 Ti

@OBXnationalism Being a woman in and of itself doesn’t disqualify someone. 1 Tim 2:12 is referring to a specific deceived woman teaching false doctrine in Ephesus. Paul was telling Timothy to stop f

1 Tim 2:12 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-02

@DiggingInTheDi1 @BasedTorba 1 Tim 2:12 is referring to a specific deceived woma

@DiggingInTheDi1 @BasedTorba 1 Tim 2:12 is referring to a specific deceived woman in Ephesus, not all women. https://t.co/rBGS8Fof6Y

1 Tim 2:12 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-02

@aflawedmanofGod @M_Jensen23 @ortrails @goteamcarr Genesis 2 is pretty clear that the man was made before the woman with a sufficient span of time to observe God in the act of creating both in relation to the plants and garden as well as likely the f...

@aflawedmanofGod @M_Jensen23 @ortrails @goteamcarr Genesis 2 is pretty clear that the man was made before the woman with a sufficient span of time to observe God in the act of creating both in relatio

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-02

@M_Jensen23 @aflawedmanofGod @ortrails @goteamcarr There is a certain patriarchal structure that seems to be inherent in the Old Testament and the law that is different from the man ruling over the woman. I believe the patriarchy we see was a result...

@M_Jensen23 @aflawedmanofGod @ortrails @goteamcarr There is a certain patriarchal structure that seems to be inherent in the Old Testament and the law that is different from the man ruling over the wo

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-30

@JamesDa10599361 @BradyJBush @Stephen_Angliss In this passage, it is a noun prec

@JamesDa10599361 @BradyJBush @Stephen_Angliss In this passage, it is a noun preceded by the definite article, or "the childbearing." So its not a verb, but since Paul was referring to Eve earlier, I

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-29

@TheodorSchlech1 @objectaaron @smashbaals Perhaps you can help me understand you

@TheodorSchlech1 @objectaaron @smashbaals Perhaps you can help me understand your view. What does it mean for a woman to be under the spiritual authority of a man? What happens if a woman is single?

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-28

@giantshitcomin1 @godlywomanhood Or maybe you are reading this out of context? Most people can sense that just by reading the whole chapter where Paul speaks inclusively of all. Here Paul quotes from the letter the Corinthians wrote and refuted tho...

@giantshitcomin1 @godlywomanhood Or maybe you are reading this out of context? Most people can sense that just by reading the whole chapter where Paul speaks inclusively of all. Here Paul quotes fro

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-28

@scribe_ezra @Sane__Thinker @godlywomanhood Paul is quoting from the letter from

@scribe_ezra @Sane__Thinker @godlywomanhood Paul is quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (1 Cor 7:1) and refuting those who were trying to silence half the body. https://t.co/WHlrSQvbxX

1 Cor 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-28

Here’s an explanation for what seems like Paul arguing for hierarchy of the man

Here’s an explanation for what seems like Paul arguing for hierarchy of the man over the woman in 1 Cor 11:3. https://t.co/y2W82K1RWH

1 Cor 11:3 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-28

@sisi_siki_ In 1 Tim 2:11-15, Paul’s instruction to Timothy included dealing with false teachers like a specific deceived woman who was outside of the essentials. He wasn’t instructed to stop anyone from teaching the truth. This woman’s husband was...

@sisi_siki_ In 1 Tim 2:11-15, Paul’s instruction to Timothy included dealing with false teachers like a specific deceived woman who was outside of the essentials. He wasn’t instructed to stop anyone

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-28

@BraunHB0 @BrotherRasheed The first verse is Paul explaining the reasons for the tradition to NOT wear head coverings (except that the woman has other considerations). He says that Christ is the source (not authority over) every man—males don’t have...

@BraunHB0 @BrotherRasheed The first verse is Paul explaining the reasons for the tradition to NOT wear head coverings (except that the woman has other considerations). He says that Christ is the sour

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-26

@murder_turd @jakebrodes That passage has to do with a deceived woman who has le

@murder_turd @jakebrodes That passage has to do with a deceived woman who has left orthodoxy and is leading others astray. It’s not a prohibition on women teaching truth. Not sure what this woman is

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-26

@Holistic_Voyeur @RoxyWright0 @Bellisima_2004 It’s not different. That’s a misu

@Holistic_Voyeur @RoxyWright0 @Bellisima_2004 It’s not different. That’s a misunderstanding. Gen 2 is a zoomed in view of day 6 of the creation of man, the garden and female animals, and woman. Gen

general
← Prev Page 22 of 27 Next →