Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (4737) Scripture Commentary (4737)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-03-05

@ImKingGinger Except that’s not what the Bible says! Here’s the context of Is 3

@ImKingGinger Except that’s not what the Bible says! Here’s the context of Is 3:12 assuming it is even referring to women (the LXX has extortioners instead)… https://t.co/UvMRA0MdYh https://t.co/gUUb

Is 3:12 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-03-05

@smashbaals Reminder that you keep misreading scripture. The Bible says no such

@smashbaals Reminder that you keep misreading scripture. The Bible says no such thing! Here’s the context of Is 3:12 assuming it is even referring to women (the LXX has extortioners instead)… https:/

Is 3:12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-03-04

@maybemaybe37 @smashbaals It has nothing to do with female leaders or pastors an

@maybemaybe37 @smashbaals It has nothing to do with female leaders or pastors and women teaching truth to men.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-03-04

@evaanderberg @Grump_Old_Man @MikeWingerii I don’t apply critical theory and I a

@evaanderberg @Grump_Old_Man @MikeWingerii I don’t apply critical theory and I am convinced that the following are not teaching that women should not be elders or teach truth to men: 1Co 14:34-45, 11:

1Co 14:34-45 Ti 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-03-04

@evaanderberg @Grump_Old_Man @MikeWingerii Yes, there are those who see parts of

@evaanderberg @Grump_Old_Man @MikeWingerii Yes, there are those who see parts of the Bible as in error. Critical theory is another issue but I’m referring to those who agree with your interpretation o

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-03-03

@PrinceAsbel @dalepartridge Not necessarily. If they ask me and provide reasons

@PrinceAsbel @dalepartridge Not necessarily. If they ask me and provide reasons I may choose to. If they are telling me to obey scripture and they are not mistaken in their interpretation, then of cou

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-03-03

@PrinceAsbel @dalepartridge Unquestioning obedience (ie coercion)? No. Should you do things that you don’t want to do because it’s for the better of the other person? Yes. Look how Paul an apostle treats Philemon. Look how Paul commends the Bereans...

@PrinceAsbel @dalepartridge Unquestioning obedience (ie coercion)? No. Should you do things that you don’t want to do because it’s for the better of the other person? Yes. Look how Paul an apostle tr

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-03-02

@Unique95185 @rightresponsem Yes and aspiring to serve as an overseer is a good

@Unique95185 @rightresponsem Yes and aspiring to serve as an overseer is a good thing. “It is a trustworthy statement: if anyone aspires to the office of overseer, it is a fine work they desire to do

1Ti 3:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-28

@MikeFloyd126871 @rightresponsem If it is weak and pathetic to follow women, why

@MikeFloyd126871 @rightresponsem If it is weak and pathetic to follow women, why was Barak put in the hall of faith in Hebrews 11 for following the Word of God spoken through Deborah?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-28

@jatkins19911778 @BMcfonzie @rightresponsem I literally have no idea where you a

@jatkins19911778 @BMcfonzie @rightresponsem I literally have no idea where you are getting this from. Where does the NT "indict" women *preachers*? Preaching isn't even something spoken of in church g

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-28

@kudu_biltong @rightresponsem What's the problem with women teaching truth? What

@kudu_biltong @rightresponsem What's the problem with women teaching truth? What's more important⎯the truth or whose mouth it comes from?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-27

@rightresponsem Women teaching truth and leading are not in the same ballpark as

@rightresponsem Women teaching truth and leading are not in the same ballpark as Andrew Tate

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-27

@BronWen727104 @RenewedReformed @sola_chad But then why without v34-36 would Paul even say v37? In 37, Paul reasserts his apostolic authority: “If anyone thinks that he is a prophet or spiritual, let him recognize that the things which I write to yo...

@BronWen727104 @RenewedReformed @sola_chad But then why without v34-36 would Paul even say v37? In 37, Paul reasserts his apostolic authority: “If anyone thinks that he is a prophet or spiritual, let

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-27

@RenewedReformed @BronWen727104 @sola_chad You are mistaken on 1Co 14:34-35. Paul is responding to things the Corinthians wrote in their letter (see 1Co 7:1) and in this case refuting it: What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto...

@RenewedReformed @BronWen727104 @sola_chad You are mistaken on 1Co 14:34-35. Paul is responding to things the Corinthians wrote in their letter (see 1Co 7:1) and in this case refuting it: What? came t

1Co 14:34-35 1Co 14:36 1Co 7:1 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir For example, Dr. Daniel Wallace, while I deeply respect him for his expertise, is a Calvinist and a cessationist and I disagree with his theological stance in these areas because I think he is wrong. And why do other Gree...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir For example, Dr. Daniel Wallace, while I deeply respect him for his expertise, is a Calvinist and a cessationist and I disagree with his theological stance in these areas b

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir First, you have a definite “the men” occurring prior to “a man”—are you saying that this is also the anaphoric use? Second, if Paul can speak of all people (including the unsaved) and then clearly shift to the men of the ...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir First, you have a definite “the men” occurring prior to “a man”—are you saying that this is also the anaphoric use? Second, if Paul can speak of all people (including the

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir But then the appeal to style is due to their interpr

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir But then the appeal to style is due to their interpretive assumptions which I disagree with because of the contextual clues. You can be an expert in Greek and still be wro

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir I have no problem listening but understand that context is key. Scripture is not understandable only to experts! And those who know Greek and English syntax can be wrong if they don’t pay attention to context. It happens f...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir I have no problem listening but understand that context is key. Scripture is not understandable only to experts! And those who know Greek and English syntax can be wrong if

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi No, it’s not a pernicious fallacy. You said “there’s absolutely no remotely legitimate way” when there *is* a legitimate way since you have “she will be saved” all the way back to “a woman” in 2:12⎯ it seems...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi No, it’s not a pernicious fallacy. You said “there’s absolutely no remotely legitimate way” when there *is* a legitimate way since you have “she will be save

in 2:12 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi It's an even bigger pity that you cannot seem to recognize that the translators are interpreting the singular as plural and literally changing the inspired grammar of scripture! These translations⎯like you (...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi It's an even bigger pity that you cannot seem to recognize that the translators are interpreting the singular as plural and literally changing the inspired g

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi It's not the only straightforward way to read the text because your interpretation doesn't make sense of all the details⎯both semantically and contextually. Yes, and thanks for admitting that you are not aw...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi It's not the only straightforward way to read the text because your interpretation doesn't make sense of all the details⎯both semantically and contextually.

in 2:14 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi You are lying by saying that "Paul never so much as hints at" since he states "certain people teaching strange doctrines" in 1Ti 1:3. That's at least a hint. And this is not a translation issue⎯it's an inte...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi You are lying by saying that "Paul never so much as hints at" since he states "certain people teaching strange doctrines" in 1Ti 1:3. That's at least a hint.

1Ti 1:3 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi 1. Your statement doesn't even make sense unless you are saying that you are ignorant of my grammar and semantics. Who cares⎯it's Paul's grammar and semantics anyways. 2. Yes, the nearest anarthrous noun fo...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi 1. Your statement doesn't even make sense unless you are saying that you are ignorant of my grammar and semantics. Who cares⎯it's Paul's grammar and semantic

in 2:13 of 2:14 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi This is not a popularity contest. If none of the commentaries identify the option that Eve is symbolic of a specific woman teaching false doctrine and "the woman" of v14, the subject of "but she will be save...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi This is not a popularity contest. If none of the commentaries identify the option that Eve is symbolic of a specific woman teaching false doctrine and "the w

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Well, I agree with that statement. Ho

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Well, I agree with that statement. How is it a “fact” that Paul’s switching from pl to sg and back is stylistic? Why do you presume your interpretation that

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Now that we are confirming we are back on earth where people study Greek and English syntax and can read in context as authors use syntax to communicate what they want, I believe that the interpretation that...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Now that we are confirming we are back on earth where people study Greek and English syntax and can read in context as authors use syntax to communicate what

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Men does not equal man, but if it did, my point would stand from another angle. Because then the definite man would necessitate the definite woman (in v11-12). Paul wants strange doctrines to not be taught ...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Men does not equal man, but if it did, my point would stand from another angle. Because then the definite man would necessitate the definite woman (in v11-12

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Style is not a good Biblical answer. Details matter in inspired scripture. And your response leaves us with Paul telling all women not to teach men and supports two anaphoric references but not the correct o...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Style is not a good Biblical answer. Details matter in inspired scripture. And your response leaves us with Paul telling all women not to teach men and suppo

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-23

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi You are just assuming your point. But the grammar doesn’t match. In v8, it is “the” men (definite). The article comes first which means it is not anaphoric. Then in v12 it is “man” singular. We could assum...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi You are just assuming your point. But the grammar doesn’t match. In v8, it is “the” men (definite). The article comes first which means it is not anaphoric.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-23

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi You failed to incorporate the context

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi You failed to incorporate the context where Paul leaves Timothy to instruct *certain* people to not teach *strange* doctrines—you flipped his purpose to stop

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-23

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi IF Paul intended the singular and plu

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi IF Paul intended the singular and plural to mean the same thing (all Christian women) which you seem to be fighting for, then why would Paul change to a sing

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-23

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi v9-10 are not only plural, but they m

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi v9-10 are not only plural, but they match the plural in v8. If v11-12 mean Christian women (plural) then why would Paul change to singular? And why does P

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-23

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Further, you said “a woman “ means women in general but why does Paul shift from the plural in the prior verses to the singular if he intends the plural for both? Can you find another place in Scripture wh...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Further, you said “a woman “ means women in general but why does Paul shift from the plural in the prior verses to the singular if he intends the plural for

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-23

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Again, you are missing the argument—a woman from 11-12 could be generic or specific and which it is depends on the context. It is because of the article in v14 that we know 11-12 refers to a specific woman. ...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Again, you are missing the argument—a woman from 11-12 could be generic or specific and which it is depends on the context. It is because of the article in v

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-23

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi I agree with your comment that the anaphoric reference is semantic and in this case could refer to either Eve in v13 or ‘a woman’ in v11-12 depending on the context. In this case, Paul is tying the specific...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi I agree with your comment that the anaphoric reference is semantic and in this case could refer to either Eve in v13 or ‘a woman’ in v11-12 depending on the

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-23

@evaanderberg @dalepartridge How do you know it didn’t exist for the first 1900 years? I go back to the apostles and I believe that women were leaders in the apostolic churches because of the Biblical text. That said, there were churches far longer t...

@evaanderberg @dalepartridge How do you know it didn’t exist for the first 1900 years? I go back to the apostles and I believe that women were leaders in the apostolic churches because of the Biblical

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-22

@dalepartridge I agree with you. And so women who are leaders and teachers and p

@dalepartridge I agree with you. And so women who are leaders and teachers and pastors shouldn’t be relegated to just children or women but be able to minister to the entire body! You made a great arg

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-20

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 Where are you getting that Paul was a widower? W

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 Where are you getting that Paul was a widower? What do you mean “God literally makes more men”? Does He not also make more women? 🤔 Paul’s comments about remaining sin

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 If 1Co 7:2 means that all should be married, then why wasn’t Paul married and why did he desire that they be like him, single? It would seem that if you are fornicating it would be better to marry than sin—this is the p...

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 If 1Co 7:2 means that all should be married, then why wasn’t Paul married and why did he desire that they be like him, single? It would seem that if you are fornicating

1Co 7:2 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 So you think that 1Co 14:35 instructs women to marry so that they can get their questions answered? So no other woman can answer their questions? Of course, Paul is quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote (1Co 7...

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 So you think that 1Co 14:35 instructs women to marry so that they can get their questions answered? So no other woman can answer their questions? Of course, Paul is qu

1Co 14:35 1Co 7:1 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 As for 2Ti 2:4, Paul’s admonition that a soldier

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 As for 2Ti 2:4, Paul’s admonition that a soldier remain completely focused and unentangled with the affairs of this life is precisely the argument he makes for remaining

1Co 7:32-35 2Ti 2:4 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 Because you missed Paul’s purpose Im the letter which was for Timothy to “instruct *certain people* not to teach strange doctrines” (1Ti 1:3). Here you have a certain person, ‘the woman’ (1Ti 2:14), whom Paul wants to s...

@covapologetics @MissionaryJC3 Because you missed Paul’s purpose Im the letter which was for Timothy to “instruct *certain people* not to teach strange doctrines” (1Ti 1:3). Here you have a certain pe

1Ti 1:3 1Ti 2:14 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Paul is not being stylistic—we simply need to go back to his clear statement in 1Ti 1:3 that he is instructing Timothy to stop “certain people” to stop teaching strange doctrines—and here you have a certain ...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi Paul is not being stylistic—we simply need to go back to his clear statement in 1Ti 1:3 that he is instructing Timothy to stop “certain people” to stop teach

1Ti 1:3 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi The first use of woman is *NOT* definite. Where are you getting that from? Paul is first referring to women plural and then shifts to the singular in v11-12 which is the first singular anarthrous reference. ...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir @HwsEleutheroi The first use of woman is *NOT* definite. Where are you getting that from? Paul is first referring to women plural and then shifts to the singular in v11-12

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@ronhenzel @carol66944 @BibleU777 Well now, the only place authority (exousaizo)

@ronhenzel @carol66944 @BibleU777 Well now, the only place authority (exousaizo) is mentioned and it’s *mutual*? Did you miss that? Where is the husband said to authentein anyone let alone his wife?

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@ronhenzel @Pastor_Gabe You commented and I thought I’d comment—which I’m comple

@ronhenzel @Pastor_Gabe You commented and I thought I’d comment—which I’m completely free to do. Now I feel you are deliberately wasting my time…again, curious.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir Oh hi, Ron! Why didn't Paul just say women (plural)? Rather, he says "a woman...a woman...she...the woman...she"⎯the reference is specific, aligned with the purpose of the letter to stop the teaching of strange doctrines ...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir Oh hi, Ron! Why didn't Paul just say women (plural)? Rather, he says "a woman...a woman...she...the woman...she"⎯the reference is specific, aligned with the purpose of the

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@Ryan_Adair_A Yes, I agree this is referring to the seed of the woman, or the messiah. The advantage to the interpretation I shared with you is that it aligns with the purpose of the letter⎯to stop teaching of strange doctrines, and makes sense of w...

@Ryan_Adair_A Yes, I agree this is referring to the seed of the woman, or the messiah. The advantage to the interpretation I shared with you is that it aligns with the purpose of the letter⎯to stop t

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-18

@KebRayGonzalez Yet Paul seems to desire singleness to be the norm and marriage

@KebRayGonzalez Yet Paul seems to desire singleness to be the norm and marriage the exception. “Yet I wish that *all men* were even as I myself am. However, each has his own gift from God, one in thi

1Co 7:7 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-18

@ShamarYall @rightresponsem Except Joel is most certainly wrong on this, albeit he is consistent in his view. And yes, 1Ti 2:15 is there and yes, we have to explain it. Yet remaining single is what Paul advocates for in 1Co 7, so Joel's interpretatio...

@ShamarYall @rightresponsem Except Joel is most certainly wrong on this, albeit he is consistent in his view. And yes, 1Ti 2:15 is there and yes, we have to explain it. Yet remaining single is what Pa

1Ti 2:15 debate
← Prev Page 24 of 95 Next →