Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (475) Scripture Commentary (135) Theology (32) Mike Winger (307) Pulpit (1)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-18

@ronhenzel Your translation of authentein as “having authority” begs the question why Paul used an extremely rare word to convey this idea. This needs an explanation. You also missed that Paul is speaking about a specific woman because of the articl...

@ronhenzel Your translation of authentein as “having authority” begs the question why Paul used an extremely rare word to convey this idea. This needs an explanation. You also missed that Paul is spe

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-15

@EtAbundatGratia @mythreesonsb @MikeWingerii Really? Which translation are you getting that from? Is there an imperative for the command ('must not')? To exclude females, he would have to say "must not be a woman." It's not there...or anywhere. Here...

@EtAbundatGratia @mythreesonsb @MikeWingerii Really? Which translation are you getting that from? Is there an imperative for the command ('must not')? To exclude females, he would have to say "must no

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-12

@CharmyRosewolf @pastherandie @peace_got @MikeWingerii Whew! Thank goodness you escaped the inspired English KJV-O crowd. They are so legalistic about this translation it's crazy. Mark Ward wrote a fantastic book on this topic... "Authorized: The Us...

@CharmyRosewolf @pastherandie @peace_got @MikeWingerii Whew! Thank goodness you escaped the inspired English KJV-O crowd. They are so legalistic about this translation it's crazy. Mark Ward wrote a fa

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-07

@Grump_Old_Man Hi Grumpy Old Man. Clearly, Mike thinks that what he believes is

@Grump_Old_Man Hi Grumpy Old Man. Clearly, Mike thinks that what he believes is what the Bible teaches. But I disagree. The KJV is a translation into English. We should always go back to the original

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-03

Mike addresses “husband of one wife” and how women can be deacons and it not app

Mike addresses “husband of one wife” and how women can be deacons and it not apply to them. His answer?⎯ because it can only apply to men. Yup. He uses a translation that treats the reference to wome

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-29

@BogdanOancea77 @JoanBandy Joan's understanding is correct. Eve was created as an equal counterpart who was Adam's own flesh. Obedience is not the best translation as we usually think of unwilling obedience when what is intended is willing submission...

@BogdanOancea77 @JoanBandy Joan's understanding is correct. Eve was created as an equal counterpart who was Adam's own flesh. Obedience is not the best translation as we usually think of unwilling obe

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-19

@ronhenzel No, I said it is a specific wife and husband as clarified by the cont

@ronhenzel No, I said it is a specific wife and husband as clarified by the context. So this translation negates it has to do with a generic woman and a generic man.

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-09

@will_servant @KimberleeJayneW I agree with you, but to be fair, the English translations of 1 Cor 14:34-35, 1 Tim 2:11-15; 3:1-13, Tit 1:5-9, etc can sound like they are restricting women. It can take work to undo the stuff we’ve been told is Biblic...

@will_servant @KimberleeJayneW I agree with you, but to be fair, the English translations of 1 Cor 14:34-35, 1 Tim 2:11-15; 3:1-13, Tit 1:5-9, etc can sound like they are restricting women. It can tak

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Tim 2:11-15 Tit 1:5-9 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-07

@BiblewithB @MikeWingerii This isn’t a translation issue as the text already says “a woman” and “a woman…a man”—it’s more about interpretation. People have been debating this passage for a long time as there seems to always be those who think it mean...

@BiblewithB @MikeWingerii This isn’t a translation issue as the text already says “a woman” and “a woman…a man”—it’s more about interpretation. People have been debating this passage for a long time a

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-29

@Vestwitt @terryne02461221 @JessicaScroggin @HwsEleutheroi JWs just need to look

@Vestwitt @terryne02461221 @JessicaScroggin @HwsEleutheroi JWs just need to look at their purple interlinear and they will see that the Greek-English interlinear does NOT have the “a” but the NWT tran

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-22

@TheMuppetPastor What does it mean “in church”? The church is the people. How many people gathered is “the church”? The English translations of the relevant NT passages does “seem” to prevent females, but upon careful study, I believe we got this ...

@TheMuppetPastor What does it mean “in church”? The church is the people. How many people gathered is “the church”? The English translations of the relevant NT passages does “seem” to prevent femal

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-12-01

In 1 Tim 2:15, who are the “she” and the “they” referring to? Options: 1. A generic woman / all women 2. Eve / all women 3. Women* / all women 4. A specific woman / her and her husband 5. Something else? *Note: some translations change the singula...

In 1 Tim 2:15, who are the “she” and the “they” referring to? Options: 1. A generic woman / all women 2. Eve / all women 3. Women* / all women 4. A specific woman / her and her husband 5. Something

1 Tim 2:15 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-24

@graceforprize What translation are you looking at? "If a man" should read "if anyone"⎯ "Εἴ τις ἐπισκοπῆς ὀρέγεται..." τις means anyone or someone, not "a man". And yes, must be able to teach, but not to be considered "the teacher" as in the buck ...

@graceforprize What translation are you looking at? "If a man" should read "if anyone"⎯ "Εἴ τις ἐπισκοπῆς ὀρέγεται..." τις means anyone or someone, not "a man". And yes, must be able to teach, but

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-23

@MikeWingerii I am still watching your video. At [53:13], you were reading from Belleville’s book and saw the initials “JB” and couldn’t find what Bible translation this was referring to. I hovered over my Logos version and it said “Jerusalem Bible...

@MikeWingerii I am still watching your video. At [53:13], you were reading from Belleville’s book and saw the initials “JB” and couldn’t find what Bible translation this was referring to. I hovered

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-11-21

@baste_goblin The Greek is not a translation…it’s the manuscript that all translations are based on. If the original (well the copies of the original) have the definite article, then you can’t just ignore it. Also, childbearing is a noun not a verb...

@baste_goblin The Greek is not a translation…it’s the manuscript that all translations are based on. If the original (well the copies of the original) have the definite article, then you can’t just i

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-14

@MonotronFox @JHF46thPotus @smashbaals I admit, the English translations are con

@MonotronFox @JHF46thPotus @smashbaals I admit, the English translations are confusing on this verse. All it takes is meditating on what nature does and doesn’t teach you.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-14

@raydon02 @smashbaals Paul here is saying that there was no custom of head cover

@raydon02 @smashbaals Paul here is saying that there was no custom of head coverings. 1 Cor 11:1-16 is confusing for sure…and the English translations don’t help for the most part. Watch my feed as

1 Cor 11:1-16 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-14

@TheRhetorRick @smashbaals No, you guys are just misreading 1 Cor 11:14. Not go

@TheRhetorRick @smashbaals No, you guys are just misreading 1 Cor 11:14. Not going to fault you too much since the English translations make this one confusing. Just think about what nature teaches

1 Cor 11:14 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-03

@drbrudd Why can’t Paul be dealing with stuff the Corinthians wrote in their letter to him like he did elsewhere? See 1 Cor 7:1. He’s just quoting from them and rebuking it. See the MNT translation from 1924 which shows these verses as a quote fro...

@drbrudd Why can’t Paul be dealing with stuff the Corinthians wrote in their letter to him like he did elsewhere? See 1 Cor 7:1. He’s just quoting from them and rebuking it. See the MNT translation

1 Cor 7:1 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-10-01

@haymes_joshua I always appreciate when I hear a pastor admitting they had something wrong. It takes a lot of guts to admit when you confidently asserted something that you later recognized was unbiblical. However—these passages on women are hard p...

@haymes_joshua I always appreciate when I hear a pastor admitting they had something wrong. It takes a lot of guts to admit when you confidently asserted something that you later recognized was unbib

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-16

@XXMiskatonicXX @vozdecuervos @B1844Constance @PA_Daddoo @thatwitchyjess7 @chockabloc81139 @Sortaliber82248 @TalkDontInsult @cathworkingmom @BunchesOfStoats @EmmaJClemmons @Kaily_Bear @overload_animal @Kingfrenvii @AWULrusPL @MarchandSurgery @PLLiber...

@XXMiskatonicXX @vozdecuervos @B1844Constance @PA_Daddoo @thatwitchyjess7 @chockabloc81139 @Sortaliber82248 @TalkDontInsult @cathworkingmom @BunchesOfStoats @EmmaJClemmons @Kaily_Bear @overload_animal

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-11

@moniemon84 @Peacemaker811 @anahnemoo 1 Tim 3:1-13 has often been difficult to interpret because male pronouns are inserted in the English translations, so most don't realize the non-specific nature of the language. The only phrase that seems to app...

@moniemon84 @Peacemaker811 @anahnemoo 1 Tim 3:1-13 has often been difficult to interpret because male pronouns are inserted in the English translations, so most don't realize the non-specific nature o

1 Tim 3:1-13 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-11

@godlywomanhood 1 Tim 3:1-13 has often been difficult to interpret because male pronouns are inserted in the English translations, so most don't realize the non-specific nature of the language. The only phrase that seems to apply to males only is μι...

@godlywomanhood 1 Tim 3:1-13 has often been difficult to interpret because male pronouns are inserted in the English translations, so most don't realize the non-specific nature of the language. The o

1 Tim 3:1-13 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-09-06

@DST_QA The 1924 Montgomery Translation did. Translators are affected by bias and have blind spots too. Further, we have Paul explicitly responding to their letter (see 1 Cor 7:1). And if it was not a quote here, it would contradict other parts of ...

@DST_QA The 1924 Montgomery Translation did. Translators are affected by bias and have blind spots too. Further, we have Paul explicitly responding to their letter (see 1 Cor 7:1). And if it was not

1 Cor 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-11

@JonnyRoot_ This is what happens when you get creative with the words said. When you insert words into the mouth of Joseph that are not in scripture you risk saying something that gives the wrong view of Jesus. And it seems people are studying The ...

@JonnyRoot_ This is what happens when you get creative with the words said. When you insert words into the mouth of Joseph that are not in scripture you risk saying something that gives the wrong vie

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-10

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek The English translations insert male pronouns likely because of the phrase "one wife husband" but the passage is not intending to say an elder must not be a woman or must not be single or must have children. Ta...

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek The English translations insert male pronouns likely because of the phrase "one wife husband" but the passage is not intending to say an elder must not be a woma

1 Tim 2:15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-08

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek I’m not dismissing anything. I’m exegeting this idiom in context. I think we need to first address your comment “That’s the behaviour of an egalitarian, not a Believer.” Are you suggesting I’m not a Christian...

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek I’m not dismissing anything. I’m exegeting this idiom in context. I think we need to first address your comment “That’s the behaviour of an egalitarian, not a

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-06

A free Bible study tool has been made available through the work of Bob Crow, Je

A free Bible study tool has been made available through the work of Bob Crow, Jeevan Nair and Grace Ministries. It provides a clear translation and non dogmatic notes that help any reader to think th

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-26

@MiaGoss44 @MariaPIreland @_foryeshua Or perhaps you should learn to rightly div

@MiaGoss44 @MariaPIreland @_foryeshua Or perhaps you should learn to rightly divide scripture. I don't fault you though as this is a tricky passage and the English translations make it trickier. http

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-23

18/23🧵We must consider whether Paul is quoting from the letter from the Corinthi

18/23🧵We must consider whether Paul is quoting from the letter from the Corinthians and rebuking it. See the attached quote from the 1924 Montgomery translation of the New Testament which interpreted

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-23

12/23🧵Just looking at the translations you can see that some use quotation marks

12/23🧵Just looking at the translations you can see that some use quotation marks, some don’t. Some use commas or colons. Imagine how easy it is to misunderstand this to mean that Paul was advocating

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-18

@TravelerChurch I think source fits with the description in Eph 5:22-25.  As I was studying this, I noticed that the NASB showed “submit” as in “Wives, submit…” in italics, which means it wasn’t in the original.  I looked at the NET (New English Tran...

@TravelerChurch I think source fits with the description in Eph 5:22-25.  As I was studying this, I noticed that the NASB showed “submit” as in “Wives, submit…” in italics, which means it wasn’t in th

Eph 5:22-25 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-24

@BibleBashed Answer is the ISV translation: ”Nature itself teaches you neither

@BibleBashed Answer is the ISV translation: ”Nature itself teaches you neither that it is disgraceful for a man to have long hair nor that hair is a woman’s glory, for hair is given as a substitute f

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-16

@rankheresy There are lots of Bibles you can get with built in mini-commentaries

@rankheresy There are lots of Bibles you can get with built in mini-commentaries. I’m not a big fan of these. A cross reference Bible is very helpful. The NET translator notes are also really usefu

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-14

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @brmorris There are translations that say "women will

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @brmorris There are translations that say "women will be saved" but they don't reflect the Greek grammar. They do this because it doesn't make sense that the grammar is swit

debate
Theology verse entry

1 Timothy 2:11-15

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Timothy 2:11-15 specific woman,deception,authenteo,grammar,perfect tense,future tense,anaphoric,egalitarian,ephesus,teknogonia,singular plural,historical perfect,verbal aspect,paul as pattern
Theology verse entry

1 Timothy 1:13-16

Sections: cross_references, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Timothy 1:13-16 mercy,ignorance,pattern,hybristEs,paul,blasphemer,persecutor,violent aggressor,deception,egalitarian,restoration
Theology verse entry

Psalm 109:8

Sections: cross_references, exegesis, greek_analysis

Psalm 109:8 apostolate,office,episkope,Matthias,Judas,replacement
Theology verse entry

1 Peter 3:1-9

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Peter 3:1-9 submission,wives,husbands,Sarah,mutual-honor,egalitarian,context,obedience,intimidation
Theology verse entry

Ephesians 5:18-33

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Ephesians 5:18-33 mutual submission,kephale,source,marriage,kenosis,Spirit-filled,husbands love,wives submit,egalitarian,hupotasso,allelon,household code,head-body metaphor,agapao,self-sacrifice,great mystery,Christ and church,one flesh
Theology verse entry

Genesis 2:15-20

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Genesis 2:15-20 garden,guard,ezer,helper,creation order,egalitarian,woman,ezer kenegdo,naming animals,no counterpart,strength
Theology verse entry

1 Timothy 5:14

Sections: exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Timothy 5:14 oikodespotein,household ruler,women authority,younger widows,egalitarian
Theology verse entry

1 Corinthians 11:10-16

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Corinthians 11:10-16 exousia,woman authority,angels,interdependence,mutual dependence,egalitarian,hair,covering,creation order,corrective,in the Lord
Theology verse entry

1 Corinthians 11:2-9

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Corinthians 11:2-9 kephale,head covering,source,origin,authority,man woman,glory,image,aner gyne,egalitarian,Trinity,hierarchy,husband,wife,creation
Theology verse entry

Genesis 2:21-23

Sections: debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Genesis 2:21-23 rib,tsela,side,woman from man,equality,egalitarian,creation
Theology verse entry

Romans 16:1-7

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Romans 16:1-7 Phoebe,Junia,deacon,apostle,prostatis,patron,women leaders,egalitarian,episemos,women apostles
Theology verse entry

1 Corinthians 14:33-37

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Corinthians 14:33-37 interpolation,textual criticism,silence,quotation,Western text,women speaking,women silent,Corinthian quotation,oral law,Pharisees,rhetorical refutation,eta particle,women in ministry,egalitarian,complementarian debate
Theology verse entry

1 Corinthians 14:26

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Corinthians 14:26 universal participation,worship,gifts,edification,no gender restriction,each one
Theology verse entry

1 John 2:2

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 John 2:2 soteriology,atonement,unlimited atonement,propitiation,Calvinism,scope of atonement,hilasmos
Theology verse entry

Acts 1:16-26

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Acts 1:16-26 Judas,betrayal,foreknowledge,sovereignty,prophecy fulfillment,predestination,free will,apostolate,Matthias,Paul,twelve,lot,human initiative
← Prev Page 3 of 10 Next →