Search — Theology Explorer

@kraster @JerLeff @marduk_aza @paulogia0 I thought that scientists look at reaso

@kraster @JerLeff @marduk_aza @paulogia0 I thought that scientists look at reasons and evidence and not “authorities”…

@Simple_Shaman @E_Jack_Yewlait @paulogia0 Atheists have far more wishful thinking than I can muster. Life is unfathomably complex to think it could occur since it requires many multiple interrelated and carefully timed sequences that if they don’t al...

@Simple_Shaman @E_Jack_Yewlait @paulogia0 Atheists have far more wishful thinking than I can muster. Life is unfathomably complex to think it could occur since it requires many multiple interrelated a

@reverend_joey @RobertEJohnson5 @paulogia0 Nice. Well I can certainly understand the limitations of science and the problems with evolutionary biology. My daughter is also in her last year of biochemistry. Why don’t you present the scientific basis ...

@reverend_joey @RobertEJohnson5 @paulogia0 Nice. Well I can certainly understand the limitations of science and the problems with evolutionary biology. My daughter is also in her last year of biochemi

@AxelJimet @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 And in a very specific proportion and seque

@AxelJimet @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 And in a very specific proportion and sequence so that my life is possible. Such a combination of proportions and timing that is not remotely possible by chance an

@plew_samuel @SpecterAndBride Doing what you are told? So don’t you think it would be important first to determine what precisely you are being told before you attempt to do it? After all, Paul is arguing against head coverings. He is simply explai...

@plew_samuel @SpecterAndBride Doing what you are told? So don’t you think it would be important first to determine what precisely you are being told before you attempt to do it? After all, Paul is arg

@jonatronic5000 @SSpence64 @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 It happened. But you cannot

@jonatronic5000 @SSpence64 @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 It happened. But you cannot assume your explanation for how it happened just because we can see that it happened. Aliens, eh?

@AxelJimet @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 Excuse me? Please do tell how life comes fr

@AxelJimet @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 Excuse me? Please do tell how life comes from non-life…scientifically and all by itself without requiring a lab and an intelligent person to force it to happen.

@RobertEJohnson5 @paulogia0 I have an engineering degree. I’ve “cracked open” ma

@RobertEJohnson5 @paulogia0 I have an engineering degree. I’ve “cracked open” many textbooks.

@JerLeff @marduk_aza @paulogia0 Evolution as defined by variation within a species is well founded. Whether it really explains monkey->human kind of changes seems unsubstantiated. Natural selection doesn’t operate without life and reproduction wh...

@JerLeff @marduk_aza @paulogia0 Evolution as defined by variation within a species is well founded. Whether it really explains monkey->human kind of changes seems unsubstantiated. Natural selectio

@sadib100 @SSpence64 @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 We know that trees come from thei

@sadib100 @SSpence64 @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 We know that trees come from their seeds. So why don’t you explain where the seeds come from? Which came first, the seed or the tree that produces it?

@SSpence64 @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 “Don’t know how abiogenesis happened…[but I

@SSpence64 @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 “Don’t know how abiogenesis happened…[but I have faith it did it all by itself]”

@RichardSuplee @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 So you found some organic compounds on

@RichardSuplee @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 So you found some organic compounds on an asteroid?? How does that prove anything? I can blend a whole frog and have all the necessary components but life will

@SSpence64 @paulogia0 Sounds good.

@Simple_Shaman @houstmon @paulogia0 How am I being dishonest? I think I t’s time

@Simple_Shaman @houstmon @paulogia0 How am I being dishonest? I think I t’s time for atheists to defend what they claim to believe is scientific when it is utter and complete guesswork.

@houstmon @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 A Kent Hovind wind up toy? That’s a cute dis

@houstmon @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 A Kent Hovind wind up toy? That’s a cute distraction…

@AceFreeman1234 @SpecterAndBride But Paul wasn’t referring to that, was he? Else women would be all covered head to toe which also presumes that a cloth prevents angels from seeing things (why wouldn’t the roof of the church or one’s home prevent the...

@AceFreeman1234 @SpecterAndBride But Paul wasn’t referring to that, was he? Else women would be all covered head to toe which also presumes that a cloth prevents angels from seeing things (why wouldn’

@RobertEJohnson5 @paulogia0 Evidence. Facts.

@RichardSuplee @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 That is quite the story. I’m sorry, but

@RichardSuplee @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 That is quite the story. I’m sorry, but I don’t have enough faith to believe that.

@marduk_aza @paulogia0 Real evidence? What is your evidence for rocks to humans

@marduk_aza @paulogia0 Real evidence? What is your evidence for rocks to humans from chance random mutations?

@marduk_aza @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 Assuming the origin and process by observi

@marduk_aza @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 Assuming the origin and process by observing the outcome doesn’t work. It doesn’t work scientifically.

@sadib100 @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 That’s the substance of your scientific proo

@sadib100 @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 That’s the substance of your scientific proof for the origin of life from rocks?

@JeffWhampton @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 You have to start with the evidence and

@JeffWhampton @Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 You have to start with the evidence and then see where it leads before we consider whether it is the Christian God or not.

@Simple_Shaman @JeffWhampton @paulogia0 What evidence do you have that rocks for

@Simple_Shaman @JeffWhampton @paulogia0 What evidence do you have that rocks form into complex life via chance mutations?

@Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 You have evidence that complex life came come from roc

@Simple_Shaman @paulogia0 You have evidence that complex life came come from rocks through chance mutations and natural selection? I just don’t have enough faith for that story…

@paulogia0 What would change your mind?

@pauldirks @KaeleyT Hey, not here to waste your time. It’s hard to recall precisely our debate without reviewing it all again. FYI, my plan is to continue to address the upcoming SBC vote and to systematically take apart Mike Winger’s entire video s...

@pauldirks @KaeleyT Hey, not here to waste your time. It’s hard to recall precisely our debate without reviewing it all again. FYI, my plan is to continue to address the upcoming SBC vote and to syst

@DebbieM246 Yes, that’s the response I’m looking for. And Paul goes out of His w

@DebbieM246 Yes, that’s the response I’m looking for. And Paul goes out of His way to highlight the women who led Timothy into the truth from the beginning. Disappointing that this even needs pointin

@pauldirks @KaeleyT Strange, I draw the same conclusion that complementarians ar

@pauldirks @KaeleyT Strange, I draw the same conclusion that complementarians are Messi g with the text—badly. Our love and affection is mutual. So did you want to start? What’s the worst mutualist

@pauldirks @KaeleyT Welcome back to the conversation, Paul! We both think the ot

@pauldirks @KaeleyT Welcome back to the conversation, Paul! We both think the other is doing gymnastics. Maybe we can focus on the facts? History is not inspired…unless you are a Roman Catholic?

Fathers are important, but Paul highlights that it was Timothy’s Mother and Grandmother that were models of faith: "I am reminded of your sincere faith, a faith that dwelt first in your grandmother Lois and your mother Eunice and now, I am sure, dwe...

Fathers are important, but Paul highlights that it was Timothy’s Mother and Grandmother that were models of faith: "I am reminded of your sincere faith, a faith that dwelt first in your grandmother L

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-12

@CherylSchatz "The woman will be saved by faith and works b/c faith without work

@CherylSchatz "The woman will be saved by faith and works b/c faith without works is dead" "The chief work of a woman is child bearing" Wowzers. Sorry all you single women. And why did Paul advise an

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-10

@pauldirks @KaeleyT This is good to see. The question still remains why if a wom

@pauldirks @KaeleyT This is good to see. The question still remains why if a woman can teach theology to another woman can’t she teach it to a man?

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-10

@peace_got @JollyStine @Peacemaker811 Paul and Timothy weren’t husbands either y

@peace_got @JollyStine @Peacemaker811 Paul and Timothy weren’t husbands either yet both were overseers.

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-09

@revjeffvox @JollyStine @ScottCross_8 @Sean_M_Dennis @DrSampler @andreacavie @RevChrisDavis This is a clear misapplication of the context of Paul’s letter. He is not teaching that all women are not to teach men, but that a specific woman—who is teach...

@revjeffvox @JollyStine @ScottCross_8 @Sean_M_Dennis @DrSampler @andreacavie @RevChrisDavis This is a clear misapplication of the context of Paul’s letter. He is not teaching that all women are not to

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-09

@revjeffvox @ScottCross_8 @Sean_M_Dennis @DrSampler @andreacavie @RevChrisDavis Accurately dividing scripture is also important, and to conflate female pastors with liberal social justice and DEI is unjustified. The only way that happens is when peop...

@revjeffvox @ScottCross_8 @Sean_M_Dennis @DrSampler @andreacavie @RevChrisDavis Accurately dividing scripture is also important, and to conflate female pastors with liberal social justice and DEI is u

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-09

@merelyjwright @pastorpilgrim @RevChrisDavis Was Paul or Timothy a husband? 🤔 O

@merelyjwright @pastorpilgrim @RevChrisDavis Was Paul or Timothy a husband? 🤔 Or do you interpret literally just when it suits what you want?

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-07

@GarOHoff @StanfieldBrent1 @Robert_S_Morley @ronhenzel @Idolkiller I was part of a Baptist denomination for 15 years. What makes you think I’m a Judiazer? They taught that following the Mosaic laws such as circumcision were required for believers to ...

@GarOHoff @StanfieldBrent1 @Robert_S_Morley @ronhenzel @Idolkiller I was part of a Baptist denomination for 15 years. What makes you think I’m a Judiazer? They taught that following the Mosaic laws su

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-06

@Ericciaramela @DoulosDean68 Hm. But he is misinterpreting Paul.

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-06

@DST_QA @Crystalisives I’m taking how Paul is using the term kephale when referr

@DST_QA @Crystalisives I’m taking how Paul is using the term kephale when referring to the relationship between male and female. It’s never authority over. See the following commentary from a complem

1Co 11:3 debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-05

@albertmohler Paul used an idiom for faithful if married. He didn’t say you must

@albertmohler Paul used an idiom for faithful if married. He didn’t say you must be a husband or have children as Paul and Timothy didn’t meet that requirement, so this is a misreading of Paul’s inten

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-05

The only slippery slope is when you ignore or rebel against what you believe scr

The only slippery slope is when you ignore or rebel against what you believe scripture is clearly teaching or say that Paul didn’t write scripture. Paul clearly didn’t exclude women pastors. https://

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-05

@JoshWehrme90663 Paul is using an idiom for faithful if married. The male form is the default when referring to both male and female. Notice that neither Paul nor Timothy were married so Paul didn’t mean you had to be a husband. He also didn’t use ma...

@JoshWehrme90663 Paul is using an idiom for faithful if married. The male form is the default when referring to both male and female. Notice that neither Paul nor Timothy were married so Paul didn’t m

@NBidnz Yes, Ja 2:25 uses the term angels for the spies. The question is whether this is what Paul meant in Corinthians. So the idea is that he wants married women to cover their heads and men to uncover them because of spies? And there is no such c...

@NBidnz Yes, Ja 2:25 uses the term angels for the spies. The question is whether this is what Paul meant in Corinthians. So the idea is that he wants married women to cover their heads and men to unco

Ja 2:25 question

@thejoshualococo So you are saying Paul wants married women to cover their heads

@thejoshualococo So you are saying Paul wants married women to cover their heads so that messengers from other places won’t be offended?

@MJ_Nelson89 @Alex7Shiro If you are saying that this is not about the head coverings I think you are missing what Paul said at the start of the chapter: “Now I praise you because you remember me in everything and hold firmly to the traditions, just a...

@MJ_Nelson89 @Alex7Shiro If you are saying that this is not about the head coverings I think you are missing what Paul said at the start of the chapter: “Now I praise you because you remember me in ev

@JoanBandy Are you suggesting v10 is a quotation from the Corinthians? Or is it

@JoanBandy Are you suggesting v10 is a quotation from the Corinthians? Or is it because of the spies that the woman should have authority over her own head? That seems a bit opposite what I’d expect i

@SpecterAndBride @LoammiCB @tigereyes1972 @Brian_Sauve First, the text doesn't say that a woman's long hair is her covering but that hair is given as a substitute for coverings (and both men and women generally have hair). Brian says that verse 6 gr...

@SpecterAndBride @LoammiCB @tigereyes1972 @Brian_Sauve First, the text doesn't say that a woman's long hair is her covering but that hair is given as a substitute for coverings (and both men and women

@SpecterAndBride @LoammiCB @tigereyes1972 I listened to this podcast by @Brian_Sauve and his wife Lexi. Here’s a quote I’ll respond to in a following post: [24:30] “Yes. And then some people will take this as well and they'll say, well, here you go....

@SpecterAndBride @LoammiCB @tigereyes1972 I listened to this podcast by @Brian_Sauve and his wife Lexi. Here’s a quote I’ll respond to in a following post: [24:30] “Yes. And then some people will tak

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-03

@industriousmom4 @elijahtmadison @InnovationHQ2 @SpecterAndBride @tigereyes1972 1. The two glories: She is the glory of God (since she is human like Adam), and she is the glory of her husband (as a symbolic reference to the creation of Eve from Adam'...

@industriousmom4 @elijahtmadison @InnovationHQ2 @SpecterAndBride @tigereyes1972 1. The two glories: She is the glory of God (since she is human like Adam), and she is the glory of her husband (as a sy

1Co 11:6 general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-03

@ymmotrojam @TarienCole Except you got Paul's question wrong. He didn't ask if it was proper to cover, but uncover. So fixing your post, we get the following. Rhetorical Question: 13 Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a woman to pray to God with...

@ymmotrojam @TarienCole Except you got Paul's question wrong. He didn't ask if it was proper to cover, but uncover. So fixing your post, we get the following. Rhetorical Question: 13 Judge for yourse