Search — Theology Explorer

@BackItUp1990 @TheMuppetPastor @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN "For prophecy ne

@BackItUp1990 @TheMuppetPastor @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN "For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy

2 Pet 1:21 debate

@TheMuppetPastor @BackItUp1990 @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN Precisely. The c

@TheMuppetPastor @BackItUp1990 @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN Precisely. The content. The authority is in the word itself, not the vessel bearing it.

@TheMuppetPastor @BackItUp1990 @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN I think it was P

@TheMuppetPastor @BackItUp1990 @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN I think it was Priscilla.

@BackItUp1990 @TheMuppetPastor @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN You mean man held the pen? “All Scripture is inspired by God and beneficial for teaching, for rebuke, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man or woman of God may ...

@BackItUp1990 @TheMuppetPastor @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN You mean man held the pen? “All Scripture is inspired by God and beneficial for teaching, for rebuke, for correction, for training in r

2Ti 3:16 question

@TheMuppetPastor @BackItUp1990 @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN And a good case

@TheMuppetPastor @BackItUp1990 @SquatchyWildMan @JenResistedAGN And a good case can be made for the anonymous author of Hebrews was a woman.

@ryancduff Complementarians reject the idea of Paul quoting from the Corinthians

@ryancduff Complementarians reject the idea of Paul quoting from the Corinthians and then refuting them. But why? "What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [men] only?" (1Co

1Co 14:36 debate

@Christ_like_ish @pastherandie When my church was on the verge of a split on this issue, I taught through all the hard passages on women in four 1.5 hour sessions including Q & A. Mike’s recent 4+ hour video is all about application—the compleme...

@Christ_like_ish @pastherandie When my church was on the verge of a split on this issue, I taught through all the hard passages on women in four 1.5 hour sessions including Q & A. Mike’s recent 4

@Grengoli @marshalldukat There’s only one passage that you could get that from and it’s singular, ‘a woman’ or ‘a wife.’ And there is no imperative in that verse. Anything that has to do with sin has at least two witnesses. I believe all scripture is...

@Grengoli @marshalldukat There’s only one passage that you could get that from and it’s singular, ‘a woman’ or ‘a wife.’ And there is no imperative in that verse. Anything that has to do with sin has

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-04

@MikeWingerii In that case, you’ll want to review your views on restriction of w

@MikeWingerii In that case, you’ll want to review your views on restriction of women in leadership, whether there really is any hierarchy of authority between husband and wife and in the church. To be

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-04

This is exactly my sense of what Mike has said about Egalitarians over his serie

This is exactly my sense of what Mike has said about Egalitarians over his series. https://t.co/qrLE2JYlER

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-04

@mvpompa @ryancduff Mike's concern for wisdom and grace seems to be related to what he refers to as 'the difficult questions,' ie. whether a mom can continue to teach her now adult son, or whether a woman can teach on a Wednesday evening meeting, or ...

@mvpompa @ryancduff Mike's concern for wisdom and grace seems to be related to what he refers to as 'the difficult questions,' ie. whether a mom can continue to teach her now adult son, or whether a w

@MikeWingerii Want to hear an egalitarian response to this video? https://t.co/q

@MikeWingerii Want to hear an egalitarian response to this video? https://t.co/qtZ7AtuyBE

@Peacemaker811 @MikeWingerii Well, I guess a woman cannot teach heresy…but I’m s

@Peacemaker811 @MikeWingerii Well, I guess a woman cannot teach heresy…but I’m sure Mike would agree that men can’t either. So even equal in that one without a 1Tim 2:12 for men. 🤷‍♂️

1Tim 2:12 debate

@RealKiraDavis Care to hear an egalitarian response? https://t.co/qtZ7AtuyBE

@Markbhere2 Interested in an egalitarian response? https://t.co/qtZ7AtuyBE

@JPEisenschenk I went through the whole thing. Want to hear an egalitarian respo

@JPEisenschenk I went through the whole thing. Want to hear an egalitarian response? https://t.co/qtZ7AtuyBE

Mike speaks to women pastors who he advises to step down, to honour God, to make

Mike speaks to women pastors who he advises to step down, to honour God, to make the required change, and respond to what God has revealed through his extensive video series. [4:16:00] /102

Mike says, "there’s one thing a woman cannot do…is be a man” [4:03:20] Mike see

Mike says, "there’s one thing a woman cannot do…is be a man” [4:03:20] Mike sees man and elder as equal, that man is special creation at least when it comes to this life. He has no real explanation f

Mike says, “There is room for disagreement here and Rom 14 applies, should have

Mike says, “There is room for disagreement here and Rom 14 applies, should have tolerance for those who disagree” [3:40:35] Mike is speaking to complementarians, of course b/c "they are trying to ple

Mike says "It's a genuine tough question...I just don't know" [3:29:48] Mike is

Mike says "It's a genuine tough question...I just don't know" [3:29:48] Mike is struggling with the age where women should no longer teach boys and thinks this is a genuinely tough question which he

Mike says women can be deacons (and notes he has had pushback on this). His rea

Mike says women can be deacons (and notes he has had pushback on this). His reasons are because: 1. Pheobe was one 2. 1Ti 3:11 "Wives" a. No qual for elder's wives in first part of 1Ti 3 b. Many

1Ti 3:11 general

Mike talks about Abigail being in the right to subvert Nabal’s authority [1:42:0

Mike talks about Abigail being in the right to subvert Nabal’s authority [1:42:00] So Mike doesn't see it as unquestioning authority which is good. However, women will think 2x or 3x before they do t

“Fast-forward to the future age, and we are all ruling and reigning with Christ,

“Fast-forward to the future age, and we are all ruling and reigning with Christ,” Mike says. So at least he acknowledges that there will be no difference in the next age and that both men and women wi

This is quite an admission! This then means that a comp can be fully equivalent

This is quite an admission! This then means that a comp can be fully equivalent in practice to an egalitarian simply by the husband deciding not to force his will and way. In this way, he can be comp

Mike's complaint is against those who believe that women share equal authority w

Mike's complaint is against those who believe that women share equal authority with men because being a man means to him that you are supposed to have higher authority than women, and unless you occup

Mike quotes 1Ti 5:14 which uses the word translated "manage" and says that women

Mike quotes 1Ti 5:14 which uses the word translated "manage" and says that women are called “despots” who also manage the home. Mike uses this to show that he believes women also have some authority.

1Ti 5:14 debate

Mike says that wives have authority over the children. He critiques those who tr

Mike says that wives have authority over the children. He critiques those who treat wives as having no authority and those who claim that complementarians believe that wives have no authority. (They a

Mike says that he has never seen an egalitarian critique a "real" complementaria

Mike says that he has never seen an egalitarian critique a "real" complementarian marriage, and by this he means where the husband lays down his life for the wife. Mike says he means taking a bullet f

Mike addresses “husband of one wife” and how women can be deacons and it not app

Mike addresses “husband of one wife” and how women can be deacons and it not apply to them. His answer?⎯ because it can only apply to men. Yup. He uses a translation that treats the reference to wome

Mike mocks the egalitarian argument that 'kephale' means source. [45:20] In epi

Mike mocks the egalitarian argument that 'kephale' means source. [45:20] In episode 8, Mike quotes from Wayne Grudem then says, "Egalitarians...you failed!" Does this sound like an unbiased response?

Mike shows a spectrum at [13:50] with Egalitarian on the far left instead of the middle. This suggests that Mike's view is the middle view and Egalitarian is extreme left. However, Egalitarian is the mid point between extreme feminist and hyper head...

Mike shows a spectrum at [13:50] with Egalitarian on the far left instead of the middle. This suggests that Mike's view is the middle view and Egalitarian is extreme left. However, Egalitarian is the

@tjamesosborne @mc_kinnon5 @carolinecwilder @patrick10477 So your reading is tha

@tjamesosborne @mc_kinnon5 @carolinecwilder @patrick10477 So your reading is that the husband is like God and the wife is like humanity. You command (lovingly) and she obeys unquestioningly. You never

@ReformedCaio @CherylSchatz @KaeleyT @MikeWingerii 1Ti 3:1-13 and "one wife husb

@ReformedCaio @CherylSchatz @KaeleyT @MikeWingerii 1Ti 3:1-13 and "one wife husband" or "one woman man". https://t.co/QkexDUhLnJ

1Ti 3:1-13 general

@JonathanTreal Can't disagree with the craziness going on today, but it has noth

@JonathanTreal Can't disagree with the craziness going on today, but it has nothing to do with 1Ti 2:12 (at least based on what Paul intended in that verse). I also don't think males presenting as fem

1Ti 2:12 debate

@JeffreyPWiesner @coachanthonyd Of course, 1Co 14:34-35 is Paul quoting from the

@JeffreyPWiesner @coachanthonyd Of course, 1Co 14:34-35 is Paul quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote and then refuting it in v36: “What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you

1Co 14:34-35 question

@mc_kinnon5 @carolinecwilder @patrick10477 A godly woman teaching true doctrine

@mc_kinnon5 @carolinecwilder @patrick10477 A godly woman teaching true doctrine to anyone is not rebellious because that is not what Paul is saying in 1 Tim 2:11-12. https://t.co/zkbRDwQWIx

1 Tim 2:11-12 general

@GuyJones1111 Technically, she would be violating what that verse says, but sinc

@GuyJones1111 Technically, she would be violating what that verse says, but since Paul was quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote and refuting it, then she's not violating scripture. https://t.

@agtheinfamous Hm. You could show him that Paul is quoting from the letter from

@agtheinfamous Hm. You could show him that Paul is quoting from the letter from the Corinthians in vs34-35 and then refuting them in v36: “What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you

1Co 14:36 question

1Co 14:34-35 1Co 14:36 question

@Dirty_Casualty So men don't teach false doctrine? 1Co 14:34-35 is actually a qu

@Dirty_Casualty So men don't teach false doctrine? 1Co 14:34-35 is actually a quote from the letter from the Corinthians which Paul refutes in v36: “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or c

@TDisputations Well, yes it does...except Paul is quoting from the letter the Co

@TDisputations Well, yes it does...except Paul is quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote and then refuting them: “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [men] only?”

1Co 14:36 question

@mmckoyis I don't know what exactly @SowUnique1of1 is saying, but 1Ti 2:12 is no

@mmckoyis I don't know what exactly @SowUnique1of1 is saying, but 1Ti 2:12 is not about preventing godly women from teaching truth to anyone⎯the letter to Timothy was about stopping "certain people" f

1Ti 2:12 debate

@BogdanOancea77 @JoanBandy Joan's understanding is correct. Eve was created as an equal counterpart who was Adam's own flesh. Obedience is not the best translation as we usually think of unwilling obedience when what is intended is willing submission...

@BogdanOancea77 @JoanBandy Joan's understanding is correct. Eve was created as an equal counterpart who was Adam's own flesh. Obedience is not the best translation as we usually think of unwilling obe

Eph 5:21 Titus 2:4-5 debate

@BogdanOancea77 @JoanBandy Titus 2:4-5 says "...being subject to their own husbands" ⎯ the word used is the same as in Eph 5:21 of mutual subjection one to another. It doesn't mean unquestioning or unwilling obedience, but a willful subjecting onesel...

@BogdanOancea77 @JoanBandy Titus 2:4-5 says "...being subject to their own husbands" ⎯ the word used is the same as in Eph 5:21 of mutual subjection one to another. It doesn't mean unquestioning or un

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-28

@BogdanOancea77 @JoanBandy @lucepeppiatt @PhilipBPayne @bethallisonbarr Thanks for the link. This is quite a long article that goes beyond what Barr said in her book. He argues that Roman society was not patriarchal. I'm not an historian, but that's ...

@BogdanOancea77 @JoanBandy @lucepeppiatt @PhilipBPayne @bethallisonbarr Thanks for the link. This is quite a long article that goes beyond what Barr said in her book. He argues that Roman society was

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-28

@Carol52538896 @Revelation_14_7 BTW, you quoted 1Ti 2:12 and I presume you believe you are not supposed to teach or take authority over a man, yet here you are correcting me. Does that only apply for you on Sunday mornings for 90 minutes and you are ...

@Carol52538896 @Revelation_14_7 BTW, you quoted 1Ti 2:12 and I presume you believe you are not supposed to teach or take authority over a man, yet here you are correcting me. Does that only apply for

1Ti 2:12 debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-27

@baste_goblin @OnionPizza68693 @EchoToaster_ @TomWarlord @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Without a doubt, my wife and I do not share the same levels of Testosterone. However, your aggressive handling of me in this forum shows how high T levels are not li...

@baste_goblin @OnionPizza68693 @EchoToaster_ @TomWarlord @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Without a doubt, my wife and I do not share the same levels of Testosterone. However, your aggressive handling of m

@LynnCDell2 @AbidingInLove_ @ronhenzel @Duke456521 Some of us only know scripture on these things and are not experts on Augustine or Pelagius. Please, if someone wants to claim a belief is heretical, just make the claim and use scripture—or quote Pe...

@LynnCDell2 @AbidingInLove_ @ronhenzel @Duke456521 Some of us only know scripture on these things and are not experts on Augustine or Pelagius. Please, if someone wants to claim a belief is heretical,

@LutheranLifter I am not denying what Scripture plainly says in context. Furth

@LutheranLifter I am not denying what Scripture plainly says *in context.* Further, someone who disagrees with your opinions on secondary matters is not an “apostate heretic.” Finally, are you callin

@LutheranLifter I’m afraid to ask what that means. Egalitarian doesn’t mean that

@LutheranLifter I’m afraid to ask what that means. Egalitarian doesn’t mean that women become men but that women, if qualified, are not forbidden from leading. Gen 1:28 is a command given to both the

Gen 1:28 debate

@Ollieman42023 @pearlythingz Take a look at the context of that passage. It's no

@Ollieman42023 @pearlythingz Take a look at the context of that passage. It's not talking about godly women not teaching men truth. https://t.co/zkbRDwQWIx