Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (256) Scripture Commentary (256)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-06-07

@Grump_Old_Man @BahBahBased @MikeWingerii Yes but it’s referring to a specific wife who needs first to learn the truth before she teaches. Paul cannot meet his own qualifications. You think that’s the correct interpretation? “If a man” is “if anyon...

@Grump_Old_Man @BahBahBased @MikeWingerii Yes but it’s referring to a specific wife who needs first to learn the truth before she teaches. Paul cannot meet his own qualifications. You think that’s th

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-06-06

@HootyMcHootHoot @MikeWingerii Let’s focus on the literal sequence in Re 20. I believe this chapter is key to the premil view. Re 20:1-3 describes Satan being bound for 1,000 years. This literal interpretation contrasts with the postmil view that se...

@HootyMcHootHoot @MikeWingerii Let’s focus on the literal sequence in Re 20. I believe this chapter is key to the premil view. Re 20:1-3 describes Satan being bound for 1,000 years. This literal inte

Re 20:1-3 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-06-05

@dantheman278 @MikeWingerii We both claim to follow scripture. How would he know

@dantheman278 @MikeWingerii We both claim to follow scripture. How would he know he has the wrong interpretation on something unless he listens to and interacts with those who disagree with him?

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-06-04

@Dayagent47 As much as I love JM, unless I’m convinced that the Bible forbids female pastors, I’m not rebelling against the Bible. Maybe I’m confused, maybe I’m wrong in my interpretation, but rebelling against the Bible is not a valid charge. The B...

@Dayagent47 As much as I love JM, unless I’m convinced that the Bible forbids female pastors, I’m not rebelling against the Bible. Maybe I’m confused, maybe I’m wrong in my interpretation, but rebelli

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-31

@coramdeo1 @kdclaunch You get my point? How? I am the one who is taking Paul’s purpose as written, and you are the one who is taking what is not explicit and making something more which is not stated and then taking the poor interpretation of many i...

@coramdeo1 @kdclaunch You get my point? How? I am the one who is taking Paul’s purpose as written, and you are the one who is taking what is not explicit and making something more which is not stated

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-29

@avyargo @_nomadic_soul How am I twisting it by making sense of every detail in the grammar and the context? You have accepted an interpretation that doesn’t even make sense of the history where we have women like Deborah instructing and teaching me...

@avyargo @_nomadic_soul How am I twisting it by making sense of every detail in the grammar and the context? You have accepted an interpretation that doesn’t even make sense of the history where we h

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-27

🧵 “This is a issue of Biblical obedience, not just a question of Biblical interp

🧵 “This is a issue of Biblical obedience, not just a question of Biblical interpretation” [6:27] @albertmohler is right that disregarding what you believe is the clear teaching of scripture is likely

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-24

@KillmanBuck @JoInAthensGa @Eric_Conn You took a text out of its context and the improperly applied it to another text. What appears to be driving your interpretation is a disdain for egalitarianism. The equal treatment of women was practiced by th...

@KillmanBuck @JoInAthensGa @Eric_Conn You took a text out of its context and the improperly applied it to another text. What appears to be driving your interpretation is a disdain for egalitarianism.

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-30

@BradPatriarch Lexicons are not intended for interpretation. Interpretation requ

@BradPatriarch Lexicons are not intended for interpretation. Interpretation requires taking the context into consideration. Besides, are you saying that a lexicon does not say that in this verse it me

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-28

@ymmotrojam @EH_Esq @JayMallow3 You certainly are trying hard, Tom. I don't fault you for that. But this interpretation doesn't work because Paul is not advocating for any head covering tradition. Perhaps you can explain how it is shameful for a man...

@ymmotrojam @EH_Esq @JayMallow3 You certainly are trying hard, Tom. I don't fault you for that. But this interpretation doesn't work because Paul is not advocating for any head covering tradition. Pe

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-28

@ymmotrojam @pastherandie @ronhenzel @kriesese @smashbaals You are saying that Paul doesn't want the women to contribute to the learning of the community: 14:1 - "Pursue love, yet earnestly desire spiritual gifts, but especially that you may prophesy...

@ymmotrojam @pastherandie @ronhenzel @kriesese @smashbaals You are saying that Paul doesn't want the women to contribute to the learning of the community: 14:1 - "Pursue love, yet earnestly desire spi

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@Dylan04169480 @MikeWingerii Given you invested that much time on this single topic, I have just one question: if the entire series was mostly targeting how the egalitarian interpretation is wrong, don't you think it might be worth some time to hear ...

@Dylan04169480 @MikeWingerii Given you invested that much time on this single topic, I have just one question: if the entire series was mostly targeting how the egalitarian interpretation is wrong, do

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-19

@JollyStine @rr74cm @MikeWingerii Plus it’s based on the interpretation which ha

@JollyStine @rr74cm @MikeWingerii Plus it’s based on the interpretation which has Paul advocating FOR the use of head coverings which is the exact opposite of what Paul says.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-19

@TarienCole @MikeWingerii @JollyStine Yes, it stands on its head the traditional

@TarienCole @MikeWingerii @JollyStine Yes, it stands on its head the traditional interpretation of Paul advocating for head coverings. Let me ask you this: what does nature tell you is the difference

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-19

@OrthodoxBarbie This interpretation seems contingent on “domineering and pressuring” being the translation for authentein. So Paul had to use a super rare word to convey this kind of “lording it over” type of authority? Isn’t there a common term for...

@OrthodoxBarbie This interpretation seems contingent on “domineering and pressuring” being the translation for authentein. So Paul had to use a super rare word to convey this kind of “lording it over

1Ti 3:2 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-18

@JeffreyPHo67012 @ronhenzel My interpretation that Paul had a specific wife and

@JeffreyPHo67012 @ronhenzel My interpretation that Paul had a specific wife and husband in mind is not a very common interpretation. If you find others who agree with this, please let me know! This i

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-16

@johnmarkallen @SolaChristus7 @haymes_joshua We have to note what specifically Paul is referring to about the first man and woman. He refers to the time sequence order and how it has something to do with one being deceived and one not deceived. This ...

@johnmarkallen @SolaChristus7 @haymes_joshua We have to note what specifically Paul is referring to about the first man and woman. He refers to the time sequence order and how it has something to do w

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-15

@mythreesonsb @EtAbundatGratia @MikeWingerii So men are never usurping authority? Also where is this idea of a place of authority in the church even established that merely standing in it usurps it? All of this seems to be based on a conjectural int...

@mythreesonsb @EtAbundatGratia @MikeWingerii So men are never usurping authority? Also where is this idea of a place of authority in the church even established that merely standing in it usurps it?

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-14

@MikedAlamo @HannahJasmine13 @MikeWingerii This is your interpretation on a deba

@MikedAlamo @HannahJasmine13 @MikeWingerii This is your interpretation on a debatable (secondary matter). This means if I go to a complementarian church, I live at peace with that. If I go to an egali

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-13

@peace_got @JollyStine @LaMonsterMom @Robert_S_Morley @MargMowczko @CharmyRosewolf @JoanBandy @pastherandie @MikeWingerii Ok, let's say that you and your church only have men in leadership. Will that make you happy? Or do you have to squeeze all egal...

@peace_got @JollyStine @LaMonsterMom @Robert_S_Morley @MargMowczko @CharmyRosewolf @JoanBandy @pastherandie @MikeWingerii Ok, let's say that you and your church only have men in leadership. Will that

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-11

@peace_got @pastherandie @MikeWingerii "one wife husband" is the literal interpretation of 1Ti 3:2. But it doesn't mean husband (clearly) and so it doesn't mean "must be male" or "must not be female." To think this and then turn it into a commandment...

@peace_got @pastherandie @MikeWingerii "one wife husband" is the literal interpretation of 1Ti 3:2. But it doesn't mean husband (clearly) and so it doesn't mean "must be male" or "must not be female."

1Ti 3:2 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-11

@reformedbapty @ReformedCaio @MikeWingerii Egalitarianism is nothing of the sort as gender confusion. You don't know what you are talking about. And you are right... in Mike's 11.5 hour video he covered his interpretation of 1Ti 2:11-15 in about 11 ...

@reformedbapty @ReformedCaio @MikeWingerii Egalitarianism is nothing of the sort as gender confusion. You don't know what you are talking about. And you are right... in Mike's 11.5 hour video he cove

1Ti 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-10

@deadtosin610 @KimberleeJayneW @NotTheBaptizer @abidebyfaith But you are presumi

@deadtosin610 @KimberleeJayneW @NotTheBaptizer @abidebyfaith But you are presuming that what you believe is what the Bible strictly prohibits. I am contesting your interpretation. I am not being disi

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-09

@NotTheBaptizer @onegospel2021 @joyklaprade @MikeWingerii The scripture is inspired by God in its entirety including even the grammar. It is authoritative and useful for every good work. I stand on scripture alone, and not on the infallible interpret...

@NotTheBaptizer @onegospel2021 @joyklaprade @MikeWingerii The scripture is inspired by God in its entirety including even the grammar. It is authoritative and useful for every good work. I stand on sc

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-09

@TentSpike @jsrrayburn @deadtosin610 A woman pastor is abuse? Surely Paul read his bible and understood that women have been appointed by God to places of highest authority like Deborah to know that women are not forbidden by God for such service as ...

@TentSpike @jsrrayburn @deadtosin610 A woman pastor is abuse? Surely Paul read his bible and understood that women have been appointed by God to places of highest authority like Deborah to know that w

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-09

@TentSpike @deadtosin610 A difference of opinion on a secondary matter is not sin. Do you call Calvinists to repent? How about old earthers? Or perhaps amillennialists or pretribbers? Are they all sinning if they don’t agree with your interpretation?...

@TentSpike @deadtosin610 A difference of opinion on a secondary matter is not sin. Do you call Calvinists to repent? How about old earthers? Or perhaps amillennialists or pretribbers? Are they all sin

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-08

@ThomasPurell @MikeWingerii @sailemptyskies I’m not setting aside any command of scripture. But I’m rejecting your faulty interpretation on biblical grounds. Even on your view, 1Ti 2:12 doesn’t have an imperative so how do you establish it as a comma...

@ThomasPurell @MikeWingerii @sailemptyskies I’m not setting aside any command of scripture. But I’m rejecting your faulty interpretation on biblical grounds. Even on your view, 1Ti 2:12 doesn’t have a

1Ti 2:12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-07

@Grump_Old_Man Sure, glad you asked. The meaning is very much tied to the contex

@Grump_Old_Man Sure, glad you asked. The meaning is very much tied to the context. Paul's specific grammar, word choice and references as well as the conveyed intent of this personal letter and instru

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-07

@AverageSc0t @MikeWingerii Interesting church you go to. Normally, I would provide my interpretation and the reasons for my interpretation and let the listener decide whether it's convincing. Sometimes our misunderstanding is egregious and more in t...

@AverageSc0t @MikeWingerii Interesting church you go to. Normally, I would provide my interpretation and the reasons for my interpretation and let the listener decide whether it's convincing. Sometim

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-05

@FreeAme19691836 @MikeWingerii Scripture needs to be interpreted. You are just a

@FreeAme19691836 @MikeWingerii Scripture needs to be interpreted. You are just assuming your interpretation is correct. While I’m still waiting for Richard to refute me, why don’t you take a stab? ht

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-05

@FreeAme19691836 I don’t deny the truth of the Bible. Just because I disagree wi

@FreeAme19691836 I don’t deny the truth of the Bible. Just because I disagree with your interpretation doesn’t mean I deny the truth of the Bible.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-27

@TomWarlord @baste_goblin @OnionPizza68693 @EchoToaster_ @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_

@TomWarlord @baste_goblin @OnionPizza68693 @EchoToaster_ @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Challenging your interpretation of scripture is not a pig trampling on pearls. Boring is also what I've observed h

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-26

@ronhenzel @DezGroves @ortrails @goteamcarr I recant my original misunderstood wording. I'm also ready to recant my shifted goalpoasted version...just as soon as you clarify whether you haven't been wrong on your interpretation of any Biblical doctri...

@ronhenzel @DezGroves @ortrails @goteamcarr I recant my original misunderstood wording. I'm also ready to recant my shifted goalpoasted version...just as soon as you clarify whether you haven't been w

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-21

@aaron_p_edwards @ronhenzel I appreciate the perspectives of those I disagree with and often disagree with those who are on the same side of the isle as me. I have no interest in progressive and post-modern interpretations of scripture, so I’m inclin...

@aaron_p_edwards @ronhenzel I appreciate the perspectives of those I disagree with and often disagree with those who are on the same side of the isle as me. I have no interest in progressive and post-

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-21

@SansFollowers @ronhenzel @aaron_p_edwards They may be swayed by publishers, fellow colleagues, the culture, or even church culture which doesn’t like change. They may also be persuaded by other scriptures which appear to contradict the prevailing i...

@SansFollowers @ronhenzel @aaron_p_edwards They may be swayed by publishers, fellow colleagues, the culture, or even church culture which doesn’t like change. They may also be persuaded by other scri

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-16

@ronhenzel And just as I thought, David Garland actually argues against Ron's interpretation... “Paul’s ambivalence about the value of being esteemed by the apostles (Gal. 2:6), however, makes this interpretation of the phrase questionable.” ⎯Garlan...

@ronhenzel And just as I thought, David Garland actually argues against Ron's interpretation... “Paul’s ambivalence about the value of being esteemed by the apostles (Gal. 2:6), however, makes this i

Gal. 2:6 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-15

Wolfe wants all SBC churches to be complementarian. He equates this with conservative values and upholding scripture, but it’s just his interpretation of secondary issues that he wants to *force* on all. This is not a gospel issue. It should not divi...

Wolfe wants all SBC churches to be complementarian. He equates this with conservative values and upholding scripture, but it’s just his interpretation of secondary issues that he wants to *force* on a

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-13

@AlexioBasinium @jold_92 @BasedTorba @AmandaTylerBJC So your view is that there is no view? Enjoy sawing off the log you are sitting on. In order to continue a conversation, you at least have to have the reasonableness that we look at scripture and ...

@AlexioBasinium @jold_92 @BasedTorba @AmandaTylerBJC So your view is that there is no view? Enjoy sawing off the log you are sitting on. In order to continue a conversation, you at least have to have

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-10

@MegaChurchMouse @JollyStine @CatherineMcNiel @William_E_Wolfe I see. So you can’t explain it yourself? Got questions has no idea either. They don’t even get the grammar right. This article concludes: “The most likely interpretation that takes into ...

@MegaChurchMouse @JollyStine @CatherineMcNiel @William_E_Wolfe I see. So you can’t explain it yourself? Got questions has no idea either. They don’t even get the grammar right. This article concludes:

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-08

@VoicesHead100 @ScottCross_8 @3HillsMinor @Rattle_Resists @Kdubtru @michael_ronning You are already clearly wrong when you used plain English and came up with the wrong interpretation of Matt 18:20. Is Jesus there with 1, like when Paul was in priso...

@VoicesHead100 @ScottCross_8 @3HillsMinor @Rattle_Resists @Kdubtru @michael_ronning You are already clearly wrong when you used plain English and came up with the wrong interpretation of Matt 18:20.

Matt 18:20 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-07

@BiblewithB @MikeWingerii This isn’t a translation issue as the text already says “a woman” and “a woman…a man”—it’s more about interpretation. People have been debating this passage for a long time as there seems to always be those who think it mean...

@BiblewithB @MikeWingerii This isn’t a translation issue as the text already says “a woman” and “a woman…a man”—it’s more about interpretation. People have been debating this passage for a long time a

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-07

@JollyStine @WWUTTguy Do you know that “childbearing” is an articulate noun and not a verb (ie. the childbearing)? We are really close in our interpretation, though I have my doubts that Paul left young, single Timothy to instruct married couples t...

@JollyStine @WWUTTguy Do you know that “childbearing” is an articulate noun and not a verb (ie. the childbearing)? We are really close in our interpretation, though I have my doubts that Paul left y

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-30

@terryne02461221 @Vestwitt @HwsEleutheroi I see. So you don’t seem to care about

@terryne02461221 @Vestwitt @HwsEleutheroi I see. So you don’t seem to care about the scripture, just the interpretation the Watchtower gives?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-25

@crkrimmel @MikeWingerii And if you want to skip many rabbit trails, I show how 1 Tim 2:11-15 can be understood from an egalitarian perspective in ~10 minutes. Mike actually gives his interpretation in the early part of his video in about the same am...

@crkrimmel @MikeWingerii And if you want to skip many rabbit trails, I show how 1 Tim 2:11-15 can be understood from an egalitarian perspective in ~10 minutes. Mike actually gives his interpretation i

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-22

@TheMuppetPastor @SpeechWrx @theknightshift Perhaps before swallowing the red pill when it comes to Bible interpretation, consider the context carefully. That should result in rightly dividing scripture and bypassing the problems where someone belie...

@TheMuppetPastor @SpeechWrx @theknightshift Perhaps before swallowing the red pill when it comes to Bible interpretation, consider the context carefully. That should result in rightly dividing script

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-19

@Impactingright @CharmyRosewolf Yes, Muppet has good points, but my ending point was that rather than calling people hypocrites for rejecting parts of Paul’s writing (because of poor interpretations), we should love them by showing them how Paul is b...

@Impactingright @CharmyRosewolf Yes, Muppet has good points, but my ending point was that rather than calling people hypocrites for rejecting parts of Paul’s writing (because of poor interpretations),

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-16

@DeeGoingsGirl I realize that some comps are never going to agree with my interp

@DeeGoingsGirl I realize that some comps are never going to agree with my interpretation of scripture, so I’m looking for those who don’t see comp as a power trip. I’ll have to read more from him to

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-15

@CSavedByGrace18 I understand this perspective. But it doesn’t mean that script

@CSavedByGrace18 I understand this perspective. But it doesn’t mean that scripture is being torn out. At least take a look at what a Biblically faithful egalitarian interpretation looks like. https:

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-14

@WomanExploder69 @WomnOfValor FWIW, an interpretation of 1 Tim 2:12 that takes c

@WomanExploder69 @WomnOfValor FWIW, an interpretation of 1 Tim 2:12 that takes context into consideration. https://t.co/ZQizsThBcj

1 Tim 2:12 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-12

@imanii4u @drbrudd Yes, you have noted a clear problem with his interpretation h

@imanii4u @drbrudd Yes, you have noted a clear problem with his interpretation here. If we instead understand v34-35 as Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (ie. 1 Cor 7:1), then this re

1 Cor 7:1 general
← Prev Page 4 of 6 Next →