Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (255) Scripture Commentary (255)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-25

@DST_QA First, here’s a thread on 1 Tim 2:11-15. Paul is not stopping qualified

@DST_QA First, here’s a thread on 1 Tim 2:11-15. Paul is not stopping qualified and gifted women from leading, overseeing, preaching or teaching true doctrine. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-25

@hotdogclit @Zombiemombie69 @HelpMePlsss9 @MalesInDisguise Your understanding of

@hotdogclit @Zombiemombie69 @HelpMePlsss9 @MalesInDisguise Your understanding of 1 Tim 2:11-12 is incorrect. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

1 Tim 2:11-12 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-25

@trapatonzi @UGOOTWEETS Not defending actual rebellion but that’s not what 1 Tim

@trapatonzi @UGOOTWEETS Not defending actual rebellion but that’s not what 1 Tim 2:12 is referring to. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

1 Tim 2:12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-22

@pauldirks @KaeleyT You also refer to men being created first, that this is not like a grocery list (this first then that) but male PRIMACY. You referenced 1 Tim 2:13, but if you would review my post on this (below), you may understand that being cr...

@pauldirks @KaeleyT You also refer to men being created first, that this is not like a grocery list (this first then that) but male PRIMACY. You referenced 1 Tim 2:13, but if you would review my post

1 Tim 2:13 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-18

@pauldirks @KaeleyT I appreciate your distancing yourself from some patriarchalists. I don’t believe biblically that anyone is to have “authentein” over anyone, so the statement in 1 Tim 2:11-12 has a specific understanding in the context of somethi...

@pauldirks @KaeleyT I appreciate your distancing yourself from some patriarchalists. I don’t believe biblically that anyone is to have “authentein” over anyone, so the statement in 1 Tim 2:11-12 has

1 Tim 2:11-12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-18

@pauldirks @KaeleyT The exact same thing applies to your interpretation as well.

@pauldirks @KaeleyT The exact same thing applies to your interpretation as well. Why don’t you take another look at a consistent, Biblically faithful, egalitarian interpretation of 1 Cor 14:34-36 and

1 Cor 14:34-36 1 Tim 2:11-15 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-18

@MikeWingerii This is a great post Mike! This context serves as a critical back

@MikeWingerii This is a great post Mike! This context serves as a critical backdrop also to 1 Tim 2:11-15 which you are currently working on. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

1 Tim 2:11-15 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-17

@jmmooreo @danitreweek It’s unfortunate Dani saw what I said as relabeling and took offence to it on that account. I may have been provocative in how I framed my comments, but I’d sincerely be interested in her take on 1 Cor 14:34-35 and 1 Tim 2:11-...

@jmmooreo @danitreweek It’s unfortunate Dani saw what I said as relabeling and took offence to it on that account. I may have been provocative in how I framed my comments, but I’d sincerely be intere

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-13

@JohnMoo26668690 Yes, I am aware of 1 Tim 2:11-15 and 1 Cor 11:1-16. I have exegeted 1 Tim 2:11-15 in the attached thread. I have already taught through 1 Cor 11:1-16…I just haven’t had time to put it up on Twitter yet. Coming soon. But it is cle...

@JohnMoo26668690 Yes, I am aware of 1 Tim 2:11-15 and 1 Cor 11:1-16. I have exegeted 1 Tim 2:11-15 in the attached thread. I have already taught through 1 Cor 11:1-16…I just haven’t had time to put

1 Cor 11:1-16 1 Cor 11:3 1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-11

1 Tim 2:11-15 ⎯ Paul writes a personal letter to Timothy to instruct him to stop

1 Tim 2:11-15 ⎯ Paul writes a personal letter to Timothy to instruct him to stop false teaching, two different types of false teachers, and one unnamed deceived one who with her husband are similar to

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-11

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek Here’s my exegesis of 1 Tim 2:11-15 https

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek Here’s my exegesis of 1 Tim 2:11-15 https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-11

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek I don’t reject the plain meaning of scripture but interpret it in context. Thanks for your concern but we disagree on a secondary issue related to women and that’s ok. Your reference to 1 Tim 2:11-12 should be...

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek I don’t reject the plain meaning of scripture but interpret it in context. Thanks for your concern but we disagree on a secondary issue related to women and tha

1 Tim 2:11-12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-10

@nsraban Well, you are right that 1 Tim 2:11-15 is referring to a married woman…

@nsraban Well, you are right that 1 Tim 2:11-15 is referring to a married woman…a particular married woman. https://t.co/lwAJ5mgNRm

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-10

@Robert_S_Morley @FearlessExpress @autocorrect2_0 Here’s a thread I created on 1 Tim 2:11-15 showing that this passage is dealing with a specific woman and her husband. The woman is deceived so Paul doesn’t name her but it’s a personal letter to Tim...

@Robert_S_Morley @FearlessExpress @autocorrect2_0 Here’s a thread I created on 1 Tim 2:11-15 showing that this passage is dealing with a specific woman and her husband. The woman is deceived so Paul

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-10

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek The English translations insert male pronouns likely because of the phrase "one wife husband" but the passage is not intending to say an elder must not be a woman or must not be single or must have children. Ta...

@outcatching @GlennDavies @danitreweek The English translations insert male pronouns likely because of the phrase "one wife husband" but the passage is not intending to say an elder must not be a woma

1 Tim 2:15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-07

@reformedrandy @thatssocheeky @lagracelaverite Maybe you need to take another lo

@reformedrandy @thatssocheeky @lagracelaverite Maybe you need to take another look at these passages. Here's a thread on 1 Tim 2:11-15 https://t.co/LPisirHz38

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-08-06

@ChrisHohnholz Except 1 Tim 2:11 says "a woman" not "women" and verse 15 says "she (singular) will be saved through the (definite) childbearing (noun) if they (the wife and husband that Paul was referring to)". One would expect verse 14 to say "but ...

@ChrisHohnholz Except 1 Tim 2:11 says "a woman" not "women" and verse 15 says "she (singular) will be saved through the (definite) childbearing (noun) if they (the wife and husband that Paul was refer

1 Tim 2:11 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-26

@OccamsBraiser @iheartJ37 @MikeWingerii Right, the order of creation is linked to deception. Adam wasn’t deceived because he experienced God in the act of creating (see my post on 1 Tim 2:11-15). There is no law in scripture that says that it is sh...

@OccamsBraiser @iheartJ37 @MikeWingerii Right, the order of creation is linked to deception. Adam wasn’t deceived because he experienced God in the act of creating (see my post on 1 Tim 2:11-15). Th

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-26

@HammadAcc2 @AmyMek @jihadwatchRS Some of these are quite difficult passages. Here's an explanation for 1 Tim 2:11-15 that makes sense of this passage, the grammar, the nature of the letter and its context (stopping false teaching), the back referen...

@HammadAcc2 @AmyMek @jihadwatchRS Some of these are quite difficult passages. Here's an explanation for 1 Tim 2:11-15 that makes sense of this passage, the grammar, the nature of the letter and its c

in 2:15 1 Tim 2:11-15 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-26

@TheBerean777 @EllaFlash @Maranatha7774 1 Tim 2:11-15 has been taken out of context. I don't blame people, but if you carefully consider the grammar, the purpose of this personal letter to Timothy and the reference to Genesis 1-2, it will make much ...

@TheBerean777 @EllaFlash @Maranatha7774 1 Tim 2:11-15 has been taken out of context. I don't blame people, but if you carefully consider the grammar, the purpose of this personal letter to Timothy an

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-26

@AliciaRushton7 I totally agree. Unfortunately, it seems it is because people a

@AliciaRushton7 I totally agree. Unfortunately, it seems it is because people are misinterpreting some very tricky passages like 1 Tim 2:11-15. https://t.co/LPisirHz38

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-26

@WWUTTcom Maybe you need to revisit 1 Tim 2:11-15. https://t.co/H6ddwD2hLg

@WWUTTcom Maybe you need to revisit 1 Tim 2:11-15. https://t.co/H6ddwD2hLg

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-23

@bethallisonbarr Hi Beth. Just reading your book now but you might be intereste

@bethallisonbarr Hi Beth. Just reading your book now but you might be interested in the take I pinned on my profile for 1 Tim 2:11-15 and this one on 1 Cor 14:34-35. Hoping to learn from each other.

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-22

In trying to answer a question about 1 Tim 2:11-15, I've made an attempt to comp

In trying to answer a question about 1 Tim 2:11-15, I've made an attempt to compress the explanation into a shorter post. You might find this helpful. https://t.co/owi1JZUELv

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-21

"A woman" from 1 Tim 2:11-12 is an anarthrous noun (lacks the definite article,

"A woman" from 1 Tim 2:11-12 is an anarthrous noun (lacks the definite article, 'the') and the only sustainable explanation for "the woman" in 1 Tim 2:13 is as an anaphoric reference back to "a woman"

1 Tim 2:11-12 1 Tim 2:13 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-21

"A woman" from 1 Tim 2:11-12 is an anarthrous noun (lacks the definite article,

"A woman" from 1 Tim 2:11-12 is an anarthrous noun (lacks the definite article, 'the') and the only sustainable explanation for "the woman" in 1 Tim 2:13 is as a anaphoric reference back to "a woman"

1 Tim 2:11-12 1 Tim 2:13 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-21

@calandgrant @MikeWingerii 1) Both men and women were made in God's image! The woman, however, is both the glory of man and the glory of God since she was made from the man. 2) Adam's sin is important because he sinned with knowledge (Eve was decei...

@calandgrant @MikeWingerii 1) Both men and women were made in God's image! The woman, however, is both the glory of man and the glory of God since she was made from the man. 2) Adam's sin is importa

1 Tim 2:14 1 Tim 2:15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-20

@LauraRicha42528 @_nomadic_soul @DrFrankTurek The only connection with God’s order was deception. At least that’s how Paul parses Gen 1-3 in 1 Tim 2:11-15. It’s not about authority. It’s about a man who had been given knowledge completely failing ...

@LauraRicha42528 @_nomadic_soul @DrFrankTurek The only connection with God’s order was deception. At least that’s how Paul parses Gen 1-3 in 1 Tim 2:11-15. It’s not about authority. It’s about a ma

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-20

@MikeWingerii Here's my exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15. Hope you find it helpful.

@MikeWingerii Here's my exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15. Hope you find it helpful. There needs to be peace brought on this issue so that it stops being a matter of division. https://t.co/dvkKdPd1sy

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-20

1/🧵In light of some who believe that female pastors (and those who support them) are in high-handed rebellion against God, I'd like to provide an exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 which is egalitarian and Biblically faithful. We need to remember that thos...

1/🧵In light of some who believe that female pastors (and those who support them) are in high-handed rebellion against God, I'd like to provide an exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 which is egalitarian and B

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-20

2/🧵Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 1) Context in 1 Timothy 1 "A Text Without

2/🧵Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 1) Context in 1 Timothy 1 "A Text Without A Context is Pretext for a Prooftext" First, we must review the context of our passage as context is what limits possib

1 Tim 2:11-15 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-20

3/🧵 Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 2) Context in 1 Timothy 2:1-10 In Chapter

3/🧵 Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 2) Context in 1 Timothy 2:1-10 In Chapter 2 and following the context of false teaching, Paul gives instructions on dealing with various related issues. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

1 Tim 2:11-15 1 Timothy 2:1-10 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-20

4/🧵 Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 3) 1 Timothy 2:11-12 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 4-1. Paul then switches to the singular form in verse 11 (singular feminine) when he gives the command that "a woman" must receive instruction in quietness and in full submission to...

4/🧵 Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 3) 1 Timothy 2:11-12 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 4-1. Paul then switches to the singular form in verse 11 (singular feminine) when he gives the command that "a woman" must receive

1 Tim 2:11-15 1 Timothy 2:11-12 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-20

5/🧵 Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 4) 1 Timothy 2:13-14 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 5-1. In 1 Tim 2:13-14, Paul relates the problem back to Genesis where the first one created is connected to not being deceived.  Adam is not connected to authority but to that of no...

5/🧵 Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 4) 1 Timothy 2:13-14 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 5-1. In 1 Tim 2:13-14, Paul relates the problem back to Genesis where the first one created is connected to not being deceived.  Ad

1 Tim 2:11-15 1 Tim 2:13-14 1 Timothy 2:13-14 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-20

6/🧵 Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 5, final) 1 Timothy 2:15 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 6-1. In

6/🧵 Exposition of 1 Tim 2:11-15 (part 5, final) 1 Timothy 2:15 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 6-1. In 1 Tim 2:15, 'the woman' is said that she 'will be saved if'⎯it is in the future tense.  This cannot be Eve because Eve

1 Tim 2:11-15 1 Tim 2:15 1 Timothy 2:15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-19

@MikeWingerii This is precisely how I was able to understand that in 1 Tim 2:11-

@MikeWingerii This is precisely how I was able to understand that in 1 Tim 2:11-15 Paul was not preventing all women from teaching others (including men).

1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-14

@rofbethany @MikeWingerii This is not a passage concerning salvation (like what

@rofbethany @MikeWingerii This is not a passage concerning salvation (like what Peter was referring to there), but nonetheless, it is a hard passage. I don’t think I know anyone—especially scholars,

1 Tim 2:15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-07-10

@MikeWingerii Were you thinking of Occam’s Razor? “the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements.” This is good wisdom. In the case of 1 Tim 2:11-15, however, we are...

@MikeWingerii Were you thinking of Occam’s Razor? “the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements.” This is good wisd

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-21

@TomBuck @DaveSmith2019 That’s not a very open-minded response. I have a comple

@TomBuck @DaveSmith2019 That’s not a very open-minded response. I have a completely legitimate Biblical exegetical interpretation of 1 Cor 14:34-35, 1 Tim 2:11-15, 1 Tim 3:1-13, Titus 1:5-9 that does

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Tim 2:11-15 1 Tim 3:1-13 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-21

@jasonkeithallen I think Rick is referencing 1 Tim 2:11-12 here. You don’t think this means that women cannot teach or exercise authority over men? So the only thing that the SBC is standing for is that women cannot hold the position of pastor/elde...

@jasonkeithallen I think Rick is referencing 1 Tim 2:11-12 here. You don’t think this means that women cannot teach or exercise authority over men? So the only thing that the SBC is standing for is

1 Tim 2:11-12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-21

@casey1167 @naw_elbows @MikeWingerii Maybe the complementarian interpretation of

@casey1167 @naw_elbows @MikeWingerii Maybe the complementarian interpretation of 1 Tim 2:11-15 and 1 Tim 3 is incorrect.

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-20

@DeannaR00467515 @AnnaGraceWood Paul says in 1 Tim 2 that the creation order was the reason for either being deceived or not deceived. The reason is clear in a careful reading of Gen 2: God created in front of Adam, so he was aware of the origin of ...

@DeannaR00467515 @AnnaGraceWood Paul says in 1 Tim 2 that the creation order was the reason for either being deceived or not deceived. The reason is clear in a careful reading of Gen 2: God created i

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-17

@chimpchompchamp @MikeWingerii @kitchenSvenk30 But these passages are highly debated for good reasons. There is no statement "an elder must not be a woman." The grammar and wording and back ref to Adam and Eve, etc. and context are not properly tak...

@chimpchompchamp @MikeWingerii @kitchenSvenk30 But these passages are highly debated for good reasons. There is no statement "an elder must not be a woman." The grammar and wording and back ref to A

1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-17

@William_E_Wolfe Did you notice that 1 Tim 2:12 is not a command? Also, what yo

@William_E_Wolfe Did you notice that 1 Tim 2:12 is not a command? Also, what you are calling sin is not listed in any sin list. Further, Paul never stopped anyone from preaching the gospel even if t

1 Tim 2:12 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-15

@Ashwin_Vengayil @MikeWingerii We can certainly agree with Warren’s points on th

@Ashwin_Vengayil @MikeWingerii We can certainly agree with Warren’s points on these passages, but he has to exegete the hard passages for women in leadership, namely 1 Tim 2:11-15, 1 Cor 14:34-35, 1 T

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-15

@PaineInTheNeck @foxes_on_fire @AmReformer Whoops. I was commenting on 1 Tim 2:

@PaineInTheNeck @foxes_on_fire @AmReformer Whoops. I was commenting on 1 Tim 2:11-15. Chapter 3 is non-specific. I don’t see a ‘couple’ in 1 Tim 1. 2:9 is plural not singular. 2:15 is singular no

singular. 2:15 1 Tim 2:11-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-15

@PaineInTheNeck @foxes_on_fire @AmReformer I agree that defying explicit instruction in scripture is a sin and is important. But these verses (1 Cor 14:34-35, 1 Tim 2:11-15) are not clear in silencing all women. You need to hear out others who inte...

@PaineInTheNeck @foxes_on_fire @AmReformer I agree that defying explicit instruction in scripture is a sin and is important. But these verses (1 Cor 14:34-35, 1 Tim 2:11-15) are not clear in silencin

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-15

@lisanicolegaron @OliveGarden5505 @RickWarren The reason why many focus on 1 Cor 14:34-35, 1 Cor 11:1-16, 1 Tim 2:11-15, 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1, Gen 2-3, etc is because they seem to speak to the issue of women in leadership. I believe however, that if ...

@lisanicolegaron @OliveGarden5505 @RickWarren The reason why many focus on 1 Cor 14:34-35, 1 Cor 11:1-16, 1 Tim 2:11-15, 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1, Gen 2-3, etc is because they seem to speak to the issue of

1 Cor 11:1-16 1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Tim 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-14

@Tomasdearc @Moralco61898803 @William_E_Wolfe @RickWarren 1 Tim 2:12 is plainly

@Tomasdearc @Moralco61898803 @William_E_Wolfe @RickWarren 1 Tim 2:12 is plainly worded and has virtually universal agreement? You’ve got to be kidding. How many commentaries have your read my dear b

1 Tim 2:12 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-14

@Tomasdearc @Moralco61898803 @William_E_Wolfe @RickWarren So you are 100% certain you are correct? No chance you are mistaken? Even though 1 Tim 2:11-15 is highly debated and 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 don’t say “must not be a woman”? So its rebellion an...

@Tomasdearc @Moralco61898803 @William_E_Wolfe @RickWarren So you are 100% certain you are correct? No chance you are mistaken? Even though 1 Tim 2:11-15 is highly debated and 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 don

1 Tim 2:11-15 question
← Prev Page 5 of 6 Next →