Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (765) Scripture Commentary (558) Theology (34) Mike Winger (159) Pulpit (14)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-30

@LordFerguson09 @Dankrightanon Thanks for being honest. I agree that the husband is head *of* his wife. Your use of over presumes it means boss or authority. Eve was made from Adam's flesh and bone⎯thus he is the source of his wife. And marriage sy...

@LordFerguson09 @Dankrightanon Thanks for being honest. I agree that the husband is head *of* his wife. Your use of over presumes it means boss or authority. Eve was made from Adam's flesh and bone⎯

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-29

@Nixon72Reagan80 @iheartJ37 @TheAwokeSlayer @rightresponsem You mean Paul does n

@Nixon72Reagan80 @iheartJ37 @TheAwokeSlayer @rightresponsem You mean Paul does not allow that woman in Ephesus to teach heresy? Her husband, likely an elder, was doing and saying nothing—remarkably ju

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-27

@EManFleming @carol66944 A wife has two glories—as a human created in the image

@EManFleming @carol66944 A wife has two glories—as a human created in the image of God, she is the glory of God. Then referring back to the first creation being created from Adam’s side, she is the gl

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-26

@TheAwokeSlayer @rightresponsem If the English translation inserts ideas not in the original words then “following the plain English” is not being faithful to God’s intent. The world God created had no hierarchy until Adam decided to rule his wife. ...

@TheAwokeSlayer @rightresponsem If the English translation inserts ideas not in the original words then “following the plain English” is not being faithful to God’s intent. The world God created had

Ge 1:28 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir Oh hi, Ron! Why didn't Paul just say women (plural)? Rather, he says "a woman...a woman...she...the woman...she"⎯the reference is specific, aligned with the purpose of the letter to stop the teaching of strange doctrines ...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir Oh hi, Ron! Why didn't Paul just say women (plural)? Rather, he says "a woman...a woman...she...the woman...she"⎯the reference is specific, aligned with the purpose of the

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-19

@Ryan_Adair_A Yes, I agree this is referring to the seed of the woman, or the messiah. The advantage to the interpretation I shared with you is that it aligns with the purpose of the letter⎯to stop teaching of strange doctrines, and makes sense of w...

@Ryan_Adair_A Yes, I agree this is referring to the seed of the woman, or the messiah. The advantage to the interpretation I shared with you is that it aligns with the purpose of the letter⎯to stop t

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-14

@JohnBAdams77 @Just_A_Man67 @dougponder The answer was no. And I’m egalitarian n

@JohnBAdams77 @Just_A_Man67 @dougponder The answer was no. And I’m egalitarian not feminist.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-12

@VerilyJonah @rightresponsem 1Ti 2:13-14 tells us that Adam was not deceived and links it to the fact that he was created first in time sequence. So then when you revisit Genesis 2, you can see what is going on—Adam is watching animals being created ...

@VerilyJonah @rightresponsem 1Ti 2:13-14 tells us that Adam was not deceived and links it to the fact that he was created first in time sequence. So then when you revisit Genesis 2, you can see what i

1Ti 2:13-14 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-12

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning Paul’s teaching in 1Ti 2:11-15 are specific to a wife teaching false doctrine and a husband who is informed but silent—likely an elder who refuses to stop the false teaching b/c it’s hi...

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning Paul’s teaching in 1Ti 2:11-15 are specific to a wife teaching false doctrine and a husband who is informed but silent—likely an elder

1Ti 2:11-15 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-12

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning The “they” can’

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning The “they” can’t refer to Adam and Eve as they are dead and can do nothing in the present. So you then have Paul referring to everyone

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-12

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning You are making this up since Eve is never said to authentein Adam (and the LXX is the Greek OT). She didn’t even speak to Adam or teach him in the text of Genesis 3. That Adam is prophe...

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning You are making this up since Eve is never said to authentein Adam (and the LXX is the Greek OT). She didn’t even speak to Adam or teach

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-12

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning Huh? Where does scripture ever say that Eve was authentein over Adam? Check the LXX if you must. She doesn’t even talk to Adam, only the serpent! Also, God doesn’t curse the man nor th...

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning Huh? Where does scripture ever say that Eve was authentein over Adam? Check the LXX if you must. She doesn’t even talk to Adam, only th

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-31

@EManFleming While it is true that man is the glory of God, the woman is also the glory of God since she is the same flesh as man. But the woman (ie. Eve) is also the glory of man (ie. Adam). Marriage always maps back to the first marriage, so we say...

@EManFleming While it is true that man is the glory of God, the woman is also the glory of God since she is the same flesh as man. But the woman (ie. Eve) is also the glory of man (ie. Adam). Marriage

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-31

@EManFleming Next, the woman is made from the flesh and bone of Adam, thus Adam is the head (ie. source) of Eve. Finally, the next significant event is the origin of Christ’s humanity—God is the head (ie. source) of Christ’s body. Nothing to do with...

@EManFleming Next, the woman is made from the flesh and bone of Adam, thus Adam is the head (ie. source) of Eve. Finally, the next significant event is the origin of Christ’s humanity—God is the head

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-31

@EManFleming When God said to Adam “because you listened to the *voice* of your

@EManFleming When God said to Adam “because you listened to the *voice* of your wife” God was stating that Adam was not unaware of the conversation. She never spoke to Adam, but to the serpent. Yet Ad

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-31

@StothersRyan @Peacemaker811 No one should be the ruler or authority over their spouse period. And the husband is the head of the wife because marriage goes back to Eden where Adam’s flesh and bone is the source of his wife. Our marriage simply maps ...

@StothersRyan @Peacemaker811 No one should be the ruler or authority over their spouse period. And the husband is the head of the wife because marriage goes back to Eden where Adam’s flesh and bone is

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-26

@TheRednartso @HolyHomebody You assume ‘head’ means authority or boss, but in Scripture, it often means ‘source.’ Christ is the source of His body’s life. The husband is head of his wife as marriage reflects Adam and Eve in Eden and Adam’s flesh an...

@TheRednartso @HolyHomebody You assume ‘head’ means authority or boss, but in Scripture, it often means ‘source.’ Christ is the source of His body’s life. The husband is head of his wife as marriage

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-25

@pauldirks @Particular_Drew Can you define federal head? I’ve only heard Adam sp

@pauldirks @Particular_Drew Can you define federal head? I’ve only heard Adam spoken of in those terms, not Abraham.

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-25

@noblama @slstruik @MikeWingerii This has to be read in context as it is easy to misinterpret Paul’s intent. Paul’s use of specific grammar (singular instead of plural), the word authentein for “usurp authority” (are men even allowed to do that?) an...

@noblama @slstruik @MikeWingerii This has to be read in context as it is easy to misinterpret Paul’s intent. Paul’s use of specific grammar (singular instead of plural), the word authentein for “usur

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-24

@SolaScripturaT @BornAgainMissy Why shame on me? Do you know what Paul’s reasons

@SolaScripturaT @BornAgainMissy Why shame on me? Do you know what Paul’s reasons mean? If you do, tell me what time sequence order of creation has to do with why Adam wasn’t deceived but Eve was. Do

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-23

@TheCoolhand1 @smashbaals This unique experience is God preparing him for a stro

@TheCoolhand1 @smashbaals This unique experience is God preparing him for a strong connection to wife recognizing that his partner is uniquely part of him in a way none of the other animals were. Adam

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-23

@TheCoolhand1 @smashbaals Paul explicitly ties deception with the time sequence of creation in Ge 2 and all women are not deceived and many men are deceived. When we go back to Ge 2 we can see what is going on that gives Adam unique experience that p...

@TheCoolhand1 @smashbaals Paul explicitly ties deception with the time sequence of creation in Ge 2 and all women are not deceived and many men are deceived. When we go back to Ge 2 we can see what is

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Truthsearcher53 Yes, that’s the final application, but it is clear that women a

@Truthsearcher53 Yes, that’s the final application, but it is clear that women are opposed too. Satan went for Eve, after all. Then Adam rules his wife which was never what he was supposed to do which

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@MICAH_SIXEIGHT I don’t see scripture saying that head means authority over or r

@MICAH_SIXEIGHT I don’t see scripture saying that head means authority over or ruler over but source of because marriage always maps back to the first marriage where Eve came from the flesh and bone o

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-15

@seditiouslibel2 @_samuelbrady @RealDavidReece A pastor is never called the head. Jesus is called the head b/c as the saviour of His church He is the source of her life. Adam is called the head b/c Eve was created from his flesh and bone. The husband...

@seditiouslibel2 @_samuelbrady @RealDavidReece A pastor is never called the head. Jesus is called the head b/c as the saviour of His church He is the source of her life. Adam is called the head b/c Ev

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-14

@HebronC777 @AJMxya @smashbaals And Paul never told husbands to respect their wives in Eph 5, yet you don’t deny that they ought to. Why is that? That God describes specific outcomes that are different for Adam and Eve may have more to do with Eve b...

@HebronC777 @AJMxya @smashbaals And Paul never told husbands to respect their wives in Eph 5, yet you don’t deny that they ought to. Why is that? That God describes specific outcomes that are differe

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-13

@Wayne34458595 @smashbaals Further, what makes you think that the precise words

@Wayne34458595 @smashbaals Further, what makes you think that the precise words said to Adam apply to you anyways? Were the details of your and your wife’s creation the same as Adam and Eve? Then why

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-10

@cothran_tom @MrKrabsKachow The debt is paid even for those who go to Hell. Scripture compares Jesus' work with the impact of Adam's one act. We did nothing to inherit sin and death. In the same way, Jesus' work gives life to all. But God has determi...

@cothran_tom @MrKrabsKachow The debt is paid even for those who go to Hell. Scripture compares Jesus' work with the impact of Adam's one act. We did nothing to inherit sin and death. In the same way,

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-02

@juvelibertarian @nchokie02_adam @MikeWingerii So accepting the apostles means I

@juvelibertarian @nchokie02_adam @MikeWingerii So accepting the apostles means I have to accept the current Orthodox veneration of dead saints and icons? You don’t see how this is a stretch?

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-02

@juvelibertarian @nchokie02_adam @MikeWingerii I’m not forgetting, but yes, the

@juvelibertarian @nchokie02_adam @MikeWingerii I’m not forgetting, but yes, the New Testament was being written to preserve what the apostles were orally teaching and to capture the eye witness testim

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-02

@juvelibertarian @nchokie02_adam @MikeWingerii The apostles? Yes.

@juvelibertarian @nchokie02_adam @MikeWingerii The apostles? Yes.

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-02

@juvelibertarian @nchokie02_adam @MikeWingerii Why? We have scripture. Any tradi

@juvelibertarian @nchokie02_adam @MikeWingerii Why? We have scripture. Any traditions that the apostles thought were important were recorded in scripture. What more do we need?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-02

@flauridian The context of 1Ti is clearly stopping false teaching not true teaching. And the grammar of 1Ti 2:12 is singular, not plural. The explanation needs to be coherent of the grammar, the reference to Adam and Eve and the “she (sg) will be sav...

@flauridian The context of 1Ti is clearly stopping false teaching not true teaching. And the grammar of 1Ti 2:12 is singular, not plural. The explanation needs to be coherent of the grammar, the refer

1Ti 2:12 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-27

@pushforgorilla @subq @harmonizedgrace Adam’s mistake wasn’t simping, it was rebellion. Since you are referring to Adam simping, don’t you mean Ge 3:17, that Adam listened to the voice of his wife? Why did God say that he listened to her voice when ...

@pushforgorilla @subq @harmonizedgrace Adam’s mistake wasn’t simping, it was rebellion. Since you are referring to Adam simping, don’t you mean Ge 3:17, that Adam listened to the voice of his wife? W

Ge 3:17 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-10

@PatrickHen1776 @AJMxya @harmonizedgrace Source, origin, originator, one who goes first…something along that lines. Adam was created first and Eve created from him showing he was her source. Christ is the source of the church as shown by being the sa...

@PatrickHen1776 @AJMxya @harmonizedgrace Source, origin, originator, one who goes first…something along that lines. Adam was created first and Eve created from him showing he was her source. Christ is

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-09

@PatrickHen1776 @harmonizedgrace 1Ti 2-13-14 only specifies the time sequence order of creation and that this is related to why Adam wasn’t deceived but Eve was. I help my wife all the time. God also helps me. What’s your point? Head doesn’t mean b...

@PatrickHen1776 @harmonizedgrace 1Ti 2-13-14 only specifies the time sequence order of creation and that this is related to why Adam wasn’t deceived but Eve was. I help my wife all the time. God also

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-09

@PatrickHen1776 @harmonizedgrace We are equal partners like Adam and Eve were be

@PatrickHen1776 @harmonizedgrace We are equal partners like Adam and Eve were before the fall. Like how the NT church should see male and female—we need both as leaders as they each bring different gi

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-08

@Tailfeathers_WA @ymmotrojam @dalepartridge Now that's odd, you don't think the Hebrew word for rule is the same in Ge 3:16 and 4:7? Take another look...it's there. Sin desires Cain, but Cain is told to "rule" it. But Eve is not 'sin' and God spea...

@Tailfeathers_WA @ymmotrojam @dalepartridge Now that's odd, you don't think the Hebrew word for rule is the same in Ge 3:16 and 4:7? Take another look...it's there. Sin desires Cain, but Cain is told

Ge 3:16 and 4:7 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-08

@ymmotrojam @Tailfeathers_WA @dalepartridge On the other hand, with Song of Solomon 7:10, you have the idea of desire between the husband and wife drawing them together. This fits well as we see in Ge 3 that Adam alone is kicked out of the garden, bu...

@ymmotrojam @Tailfeathers_WA @dalepartridge On the other hand, with Song of Solomon 7:10, you have the idea of desire between the husband and wife drawing them together. This fits well as we see in Ge

So 7:10 Solomon 7:10 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-08

@Tailfeathers_WA @Antifaucist722 @dalepartridge Ge 3:16 is not imperative or a command but a prophecy of the fall’s result. Eve was deceived, Adam stayed silent, and ate the fruit she gave. He would hold a grudge and mistreat her by ruling over her. ...

@Tailfeathers_WA @Antifaucist722 @dalepartridge Ge 3:16 is not imperative or a command but a prophecy of the fall’s result. Eve was deceived, Adam stayed silent, and ate the fruit she gave. He would h

Ge 3:16 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-08

@Antifaucist722 @Tailfeathers_WA @dalepartridge The husband is the head of his wife because Adam and Eve are the definition of marriage and Eve was made directly from Adam's flesh and bone. Your wife was not made from you, was she? So you being 'head...

@Antifaucist722 @Tailfeathers_WA @dalepartridge The husband is the head of his wife because Adam and Eve are the definition of marriage and Eve was made directly from Adam's flesh and bone. Your wife

Ge 1:28 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-06

@Calvinator8000 @ExtraSaltedNuts @rightresponsem I’m egalitarian or a mutualist (probably a better term). God’s created order is the time sequence order of creating Adam then Eve from Adam (thus Adam is her ‘head’) which is the single example that se...

@Calvinator8000 @ExtraSaltedNuts @rightresponsem I’m egalitarian or a mutualist (probably a better term). God’s created order is the time sequence order of creating Adam then Eve from Adam (thus Adam

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-06

@ostrachan That Adam is the head of Eve is uncontested. What is contested is what is meant by that simple anatomical word. Does it mean 'authority of' or 'boss of' like we use it today? Or does it mean something like first or origin or source? I beli...

@ostrachan That Adam is the head of Eve is uncontested. What is contested is what is meant by that simple anatomical word. Does it mean 'authority of' or 'boss of' like we use it today? Or does it mea

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-03

@crusadepepe Husbands are not commanded to coerce their wives! And wives are not

@crusadepepe Husbands are not commanded to coerce their wives! And wives are not commanded to be like eternal children. It sure would have helped if Adam explained to Eve why she shouldn’t eat the fr

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-03

Notice how William assumed there were role distinctions. Then he skips over Ge 1

Notice how William assumed there were role distinctions. Then he skips over Ge 1:28 which were commands given to both. Then he claims that by being created first, Adam had dominance and that naming is

Ge 1:28 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-11-18

@ilJohnQadamso @BenZeisloft Yes, eschatology matters. While it’s true that Jesus declared, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Mt 28:18), the way that authority is currently exercised is distinct from the way it will be manif...

@ilJohnQadamso @BenZeisloft Yes, eschatology matters. While it’s true that Jesus declared, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Mt 28:18), the way that authority is currently e

Mt 28:18 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-11-10

@ThatSarahLynn @_jonbowlin @MikeWingerii The scriptures are clear that Jesus died for every human without exception. Only those who put on the robe of righteousness they have been given by Christ will have their sins covered. Adam’s sin brought deat...

@ThatSarahLynn @_jonbowlin @MikeWingerii The scriptures are clear that Jesus died for every human without exception. Only those who put on the robe of righteousness they have been given by Christ will

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-11-06

@realadamlando @MikeWingerii @noahsflood_ I disagree. Participating in voting is something we should do, but rights are not obligations. And there’s no obligation in scripture that one must vote. It may result in a worse candidate getting in, but thi...

@realadamlando @MikeWingerii @noahsflood_ I disagree. Participating in voting is something we should do, but rights are not obligations. And there’s no obligation in scripture that one must vote. It m

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-10-26

@pudgenet @MikeWingerii Well, it was a particular kind of action going on between a deceived wife and her husband that was in play because he is associated with Adam who wasn't deceived and needs to be a participant in the wife's salvation (1Ti 2:15)...

@pudgenet @MikeWingerii Well, it was a particular kind of action going on between a deceived wife and her husband that was in play because he is associated with Adam who wasn't deceived and needs to b

1Ti 2:15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-10-23

@carol66944 @Crystalisives @CherylSchatz It is not made up, it is a reasonable inference from the text. But what is not reasonable is when people think that it is because Adam is male that males alone are to protect or because he was created first o...

@carol66944 @Crystalisives @CherylSchatz It is not made up, it is a reasonable inference from the text. But what is not reasonable is when people think that it is because Adam is male that males alon

debate
← Prev Page 5 of 16 Next →