Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (350) Scripture Commentary (350)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-14

@JohnBAdams77 @Just_A_Man67 @dougponder The answer was no. And I’m egalitarian n

@JohnBAdams77 @Just_A_Man67 @dougponder The answer was no. And I’m egalitarian not feminist.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-12

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning Deflect? I answ

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning Deflect? I answered you by referring to the details in scripture.

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-12

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning Well, that’s up to you whether you will answer me or not since you seem to think I’m you regenerate. I guess I have nothing true to say, right? Just because Jesus chose 12 male apostle...

@graceforprize @ComeBack_Yeshua @Rattle_Resists @michael_ronning Well, that’s up to you whether you will answer me or not since you seem to think I’m you regenerate. I guess I have nothing true to say

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-05

@KevinCanale24 @JRowley11 I have never heard asking questions a "poison gas cloud"! How is it indefensible? Ron Henzel took a stab and answered each one of my questions. So it's not indefensible. Of course I feel I have answers to those questions, b...

@KevinCanale24 @JRowley11 I have never heard asking questions a "poison gas cloud"! How is it indefensible? Ron Henzel took a stab and answered each one of my questions. So it's not indefensible. Of

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-04

@JRowley11 @StothersRyan Ok, but Paul doesn’t reveal a standard that runs direct

@JRowley11 @StothersRyan Ok, but Paul doesn’t reveal a standard that runs directly contrary to egalitarianism. Where are you getting this from? 1Ti 2:12?? If that’s the case, maybe you can answer som

1Ti 2:12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-04

@Gates_of_Derry @brantleyrider @smashbaals @Wesley_Todd_ So what you are saying

@Gates_of_Derry @brantleyrider @smashbaals @Wesley_Todd_ So what you are saying is you cannot or will not answer questions to educate someone who doesn’t understand how to read or know much about scri

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-04

@UndeadOrlan @Keith83361 @smashbaals For those of us who take the time to read the text in its context, we see that 1Ti 2:12 is very clearly addressing a particular false teacher who was deceived and hadn’t been corrected yet. Mind answering the fol...

@UndeadOrlan @Keith83361 @smashbaals For those of us who take the time to read the text in its context, we see that 1Ti 2:12 is very clearly addressing a particular false teacher who was deceived and

1Ti 2:12 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-02

@ronhenzel @NSReicher No, he made several statements you conflate: ❌"...it's because he doesn't like the answers." ✔️+❌"Bible's really clear on these issues." ⎯ I see it clearly now, but it wasn't at first. ✔️"Thousands have...come to the same conclu...

@ronhenzel @NSReicher No, he made several statements you conflate: ❌"...it's because he doesn't like the answers." ✔️+❌"Bible's really clear on these issues." ⎯ I see it clearly now, but it wasn't at

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-01

@122R1 @ronhenzel FYI, that’s not what I think. I’m not skipping over anything as I wasn’t giving an exegesis; I was listing some important questions to which I need cohesive and compelling answers to if they are going to be able to change my mind. ...

@122R1 @ronhenzel FYI, that’s not what I think. I’m not skipping over anything as I wasn’t giving an exegesis; I was listing some important questions to which I need cohesive and compelling answers to

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-31

@StothersRyan @M_Jensen23 You said the context is clearly authority and that I have decided not to let the text change me. You merely listed texts without explaining them and then decided what I have decided. Then you followed up that any answer I gi...

@StothersRyan @M_Jensen23 You said the context is clearly authority and that I have decided not to let the text change me. You merely listed texts without explaining them and then decided what I have

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-30

@StothersRyan Where is the historical test in 2Ti 3:16? I like all of these but

@StothersRyan Where is the historical test in 2Ti 3:16? I like all of these but I don’t believe they had everything right just like neither you nor I have everything right. They didn’t write scriptur

2Ti 3:16 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-30

@StothersRyan Hi Ryan! I am looking for cohesive, in context answers that do no

@StothersRyan Hi Ryan! I am looking for cohesive, in context answers that do not ignore any of the verses, or the grammar, or Paul’s placing Christ as the head. The view has to make sense of it all

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-29

@Moppybottoms @KaeleyT The short answer is any role where a woman is in a position of authority over a man. Many believe Gen 2-3 establishes male authority and female submission, 1Co 14:34-35 commands women to respect that authority by remaining sil...

@Moppybottoms @KaeleyT The short answer is any role where a woman is in a position of authority over a man. Many believe Gen 2-3 establishes male authority and female submission, 1Co 14:34-35 command

1Co 14:34-35 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Christianous100 @lutherananswers Yes, thanks for pointing these out. This is no

@Christianous100 @lutherananswers Yes, thanks for pointing these out. This is not about head coverings as symbols of authority but uncovering our heads to symbolically show that in Christ the shame of

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers And sometimes you can only get so far in one round.

@Heiserite @lutherananswers And sometimes you can only get so far in one round. Keep thinking about it. I appreciate Heiser’s discovery of what he found on this but I don’t think it’s what Paul was go

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

RT @ryanschatz: @lutherananswers Paul already explained the angels reference. Ac

RT @ryanschatz: @lutherananswers Paul already explained the angels reference. According to 1Co 6:2-3, the saints⎯which includes women⎯will…

1Co 6:2-3 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers But the entire passage to this point has been discussing the tradition of head coverings… The tradition is to *wear* coverings at certain times when praying or prophesying. He says he does *not* have any such practice nor...

@Heiserite @lutherananswers But the entire passage to this point has been discussing the tradition of head coverings… The tradition is to *wear* coverings at certain times when praying or prophesying

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Well, maybe he keeps addressing it in his next lette

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Well, maybe he keeps addressing it in his next letter. If the veil is *removed* in Christ, why would Paul be commanding that women—also ones who believe and turn to Christ—

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Maybe then you can explain to me how *nature* teaches you the difference in head hair length between a boy and a girl. Arm hair stops growing at a specific length. Eyebrows stop growing (until you get old!). But let the ha...

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Maybe then you can explain to me how *nature* teaches you the difference in head hair length between a boy and a girl. Arm hair stops growing at a specific length. Eyebrows

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers A practice of ‘contention’? Really? Were the Corinth

@Heiserite @lutherananswers A practice of ‘contention’? Really? Were the Corinthians arguing that contentions would be a practice that Paul was promoting?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers That is correct. Would a believing husband who under

@Heiserite @lutherananswers That is correct. Would a believing husband who understands that covering for shame for sin is not something we should do in God’s presence? Who then is left? Probably more

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers I agree. The ISV translates 11:14-15 as: “Nature its

@Heiserite @lutherananswers I agree. The ISV translates 11:14-15 as: “Nature itself teaches you *neither* that it is disgraceful for a man to have long hair *nor* that hair is a woman’s glory, for hai

translates 11:14-15 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers You are interpreting it this way, but what evidence

@Heiserite @lutherananswers You are interpreting it this way, but what evidence in the text do you have for this? In fact, Paul says in 11:16 that neither they nor the churches of God have any such p

in 11:16 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Actually, it is for the very reasons Paul outlines that he is giving women a choice. If covering one’s head shames Christ, then surely this applies to women also. Thus married women have a dilemma as they have essentially...

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Actually, it is for the very reasons Paul outlines that he is giving women a choice. If covering one’s head shames Christ, then surely this applies to women also. Thus mar

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Actually, in 11:5, Paul explains the cultural implic

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Actually, in 11:5, Paul explains the cultural implications for women, especially those who are married to unbelieving Jewish husbands. In 11:6, we have the permissive imper

In 11:6 in 11:5 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers But don’t we have a Biblical connection between cove

@Heiserite @lutherananswers But don’t we have a Biblical connection between covering and shame in Genesis 3? And wouldn’t covering oneself showing shame for sin in God’s presence shame Christ since Ch

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers The “because of the angels” and “the woman should have authority over her head” are the links. There’s no “symbol of” in the Greek. Her authority to judge matters of this life is less than and therefore granted by her aut...

@Heiserite @lutherananswers The “because of the angels” and “the woman should have authority over her head” are the links. There’s no “symbol of” in the Greek. Her authority to judge matters of this

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Let me re-explain Paul's reasoning. If she will judge angels, then surely she has the authority over her own head to decide whether to cover her head while praying or prophesying. It explains it quite clearly and complet...

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Let me re-explain Paul's reasoning. If she will judge angels, then surely she has the authority over her own head to decide whether to cover her head while praying or prop

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers I understand that Heiser thought that this was not a

@Heiserite @lutherananswers I understand that Heiser thought that this was not applicable to today. But according to 1Co 11, an unmarried woman doesn't have a head. How does she disgrace her husband b

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Scriptural context trumps culture, Jewish oral laws

@Heiserite @lutherananswers Scriptural context trumps culture, Jewish oral laws or Greek medicine⎯scriptural context trumps everything.

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers But this is precisely the problem. When you don't de

@Heiserite @lutherananswers But this is precisely the problem. When you don't deal with Paul's own context first, why should we follow the Ancient Greek medicine argument?

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@Heiserite @lutherananswers I've read ideas about how hair was sexualized in the

@Heiserite @lutherananswers I've read ideas about how hair was sexualized in the Talmud, but what does this have to do with angels? Is Paul making an argument from the Jewish oral law? But why go the

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-20

@lutherananswers Paul already explained the angels reference. According to 1Co 6:2-3, the saints⎯which includes women⎯will judge the world and angels. If this is the case, then they should be able to decide whether to cover or uncover their heads. Th...

@lutherananswers Paul already explained the angels reference. According to 1Co 6:2-3, the saints⎯which includes women⎯will judge the world and angels. If this is the case, then they should be able to

1Co 6:2-3 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-14

@Hotrodchriscam @Stellar52537270 @smashbaals If the founder of the church and th

@Hotrodchriscam @Stellar52537270 @smashbaals If the founder of the church and the apostles didn’t arm themselves then you have the answer for the church.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-27

@IemSparticus @harmonizedgrace So you get to make demands and I’m supposed to write you a 5000 word essay?? This is X. Since you don’t seem able to answer my question about 1Ti 2:12, let’s move on to Eph 5:21 where subjection is *reciprocal*—that me...

@IemSparticus @harmonizedgrace So you get to make demands and I’m supposed to write you a 5000 word essay?? This is X. Since you don’t seem able to answer my question about 1Ti 2:12, let’s move on to

Eph 5:21 1Ti 2:12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-27

@stevebward I don't think there was consensus. The question came from my son who

@stevebward I don't think there was consensus. The question came from my son who had been watching Cliffe Knechtle who gave an answer that confused him. My wife and middle daughter agreed with Cliffe

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-18

@BibleBashed @harmonizedgrace @mtnhousewife @MikeWingerii Hannah just blocked me

@BibleBashed @harmonizedgrace @mtnhousewife @MikeWingerii Hannah just blocked me b/c of Bashed. Mike didn’t answer my questions nor did he interact with me. If you want to see my response to what he

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-17

@harmonizedgrace @mtnhousewife @BibleBashed Ok. If you don’t feel like engaging, then leave my question hanging and don’t answer. It’s ok. I am aware of @BibleBashed - there are a lot of accounts that promote patriarchy and complementarianism. @Mik...

@harmonizedgrace @mtnhousewife @BibleBashed Ok. If you don’t feel like engaging, then leave my question hanging and don’t answer. It’s ok. I am aware of @BibleBashed - there are a lot of accounts th

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-17

@mtnhousewife @harmonizedgrace Answering questions is fine by me. Anytime you fe

@mtnhousewife @harmonizedgrace Answering questions is fine by me. Anytime you feel you are arguing, let me reframe things so you can avoid arguing.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-10

@CoHeir316 I told you the answer. Being clear doesn’t always mean saying “yes” or “no” because it’s nuanced. You are thinking about Jesus’ deity. He wasn’t created and we were; we are not God. But nowhere in the New Testament does Jesus claim author...

@CoHeir316 I told you the answer. Being clear doesn’t always mean saying “yes” or “no” because it’s nuanced. You are thinking about Jesus’ deity. He wasn’t created and we were; we are not God. But no

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-05

@DirtBoyFarms @iheartJ37 @harmonizedgrace You mean this person? Maybe you an answer the question. “how can hypotassō possibly convey one meaning for men & an entirely different one for women when Paul uses the term just 1x to address both in t...

@DirtBoyFarms @iheartJ37 @harmonizedgrace You mean this person? Maybe you an answer the question. “how can hypotassō possibly convey one meaning for men & an entirely different one for women wh

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-10-23

@MikeWingerii @SKokenos You say that the man is continually being unfaithful to his wives by his polygamous marriage. Your answer? Any/all of the wives have a right to divorce, but the husband doesn't. But if what you are saying is true, then the h...

@MikeWingerii @SKokenos You say that the man is continually being unfaithful to his wives by his polygamous marriage. Your answer? Any/all of the wives have a right to divorce, but the husband doesn'

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-10-14

@Methodios007 I don't think you will accept any answer. You have your belief and

@Methodios007 I don't think you will accept any answer. You have your belief and you won't accept that a succession from the apostles to today is not necessary to establish or rely upon.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-09-20

@TracyWelborn6 Are you a Mormon? Because that’s exactly what the Mormon bishops

@TracyWelborn6 Are you a Mormon? Because that’s exactly what the Mormon bishops were telling me when they were in my Livingroom trying to answer my questions. God anticipated the fall, so there’s no

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-09-17

@1611Willaim @fishercatMaine @Protestia Thanks for the respect. And yes, the ans

@1611Willaim @fishercatMaine @Protestia Thanks for the respect. And yes, the answers are in the Bible. Respectfully, I can likely see your perspective but I don’t think it makes sense of the text.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-08-01

@ravensfoodblog @MikeWingerii ...women in leadership but are willing to work within a complementarian system and keep the peace, how is that a problem? There really was no sufficient answers to these things, but it did get this pastor to think as he ...

@ravensfoodblog @MikeWingerii ...women in leadership but are willing to work within a complementarian system and keep the peace, how is that a problem? There really was no sufficient answers to these

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-07-30

@ravensfoodblog @MikeWingerii Clearly Origen is trying to take into consideration how women are to be silent and yet Miriam can address the assembly—his answer is that the silence has to do with having authority over men. Of course Origen isn’t takin...

@ravensfoodblog @MikeWingerii Clearly Origen is trying to take into consideration how women are to be silent and yet Miriam can address the assembly—his answer is that the silence has to do with havin

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-07-09

@conwarrior47 @TaraLynnSays @PastorMikeStone So your answer is Biden?

@conwarrior47 @TaraLynnSays @PastorMikeStone So your answer is Biden?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-07-07

@avyargo @neecygrace @MikeWingerii You really need me to answer them? Ok. There's no woman called "pastor" in the Bible. Neither is there any man called "pastor." What are you trying to prove? There's no Biblical book which claims to be written by ...

@avyargo @neecygrace @MikeWingerii You really need me to answer them? Ok. There's no woman called "pastor" in the Bible. Neither is there any man called "pastor." What are you trying to prove? There

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-06-12

@landjax @Charb_izard The question was about who will be greatest in heaven and then Jesus gathered the 12 to explain that the greatest is the one who is the slave of all. This is about the idea of hierarchy and who has authority and how it is exerci...

@landjax @Charb_izard The question was about who will be greatest in heaven and then Jesus gathered the 12 to explain that the greatest is the one who is the slave of all. This is about the idea of hi

debate
← Prev Page 5 of 7 Next →