Search — Theology Explorer

Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more

All (264) Scripture Commentary (264)

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-13

@terryne02461221 @Vestwitt @HwsEleutheroi Again, you assume that the death of the body means death of the soul. Lk 23:43 - Jesus said to the thief on the cross, "Truly, I say to you, TODAY you will be with me in Paradise." This statement suggests an...

@terryne02461221 @Vestwitt @HwsEleutheroi Again, you assume that the death of the body means death of the soul. Lk 23:43 - Jesus said to the thief on the cross, "Truly, I say to you, TODAY you will b

Lk 23:43 Phil 1:23 commentary

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-10

@MegaChurchMouse @JollyStine @CatherineMcNiel @William_E_Wolfe I see. So you can’t explain it yourself? Got questions has no idea either. They don’t even get the grammar right. This article concludes: “The most likely interpretation that takes into ...

@MegaChurchMouse @JollyStine @CatherineMcNiel @William_E_Wolfe I see. So you can’t explain it yourself? Got questions has no idea either. They don’t even get the grammar right. This article concludes:

commentary

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-06

@Crop_Ins_Guy @pastherandie @William_E_Wolfe Or perhaps just as the Judiazers cr

@Crop_Ins_Guy @pastherandie @William_E_Wolfe Or perhaps just as the Judiazers crept into the early church to “spy on their freedom,” we’ve got a new wave of…for lack of a better term…Pharisees (by thi

@terryne02461221 @Vestwitt @HwsEleutheroi Again, you assume that the death of the body means death of the soul. Lk 23:43 - Jesus said to the thief on the cross, "Truly, I say to you, TODAY you will be with me in Paradise." This statement suggests an...

@MegaChurchMouse @JollyStine @CatherineMcNiel @William_E_Wolfe I see. So you can’t explain it yourself? Got questions has no idea either. They don’t even get the grammar right. This article concludes: “The most likely interpretation that takes into ...

@Crop_Ins_Guy @pastherandie @William_E_Wolfe Or perhaps just as the Judiazers cr

@LearningReason @itskellydiane @SummrWrites I would quite agree with Bercot in that primary sources are extremely important. Quoting someone quoting someone is very likely to get you into trouble someday. That said, I don't think the primary source...

@itskellydiane My wife is a physio and a great one at that. We raised 3 children

@LearningReason @itskellydiane @SummrWrites Interesting, I've never heard someone say that women have to cover their head in the privacy of their own bedroom while praying. That phrase "symbol of" is not in the Greek. It is added by translators who...

@yorel480 @lasteveharvest @itskellydiane What? Where are you getting this from? There's nothing in the Talmud that specifies shaving a prostitutes head as a form of punishment. The Bible calls for the death penalty for adultery. Maybe there were Gre...

@LearningReason @itskellydiane @SummrWrites Ok, there is certainly something going on⎯though it seems to be with the Judiazers. In Jewish contexts, if a wife were to become a Christian and then were found to be uncovered in public, this may lead to ...

@naegore @lasteveharvest @itskellydiane I think you are missing what Paul is saying here. Paul says in verse 6 that "If a woman does not cover her head, let her also cut her hair"⎯κειράσθω is a permissive imperative in the middle voice (ie. Paul is ...

@itskellydiane @SummrWrites My goodness. I think you just have to go back...all

@TheMuppetPastor @ZrimecSteve Wives don’t have a mediator though, they don’t need a second saviour figure either. Mutualists recognize that while Paul doesn’t state it in these passages, the source of the woman is also through Christ who formed Eve ...

@TheMuppetPastor @DoctrineofTulip @autocorrect2_0 Every a Christian is called a

@MediatorsGate @TheMuppetPastor https://t.co/ZQizsThBcj

I drew a diagram showing the syntactic relationships of the terms Paul uses in 1

@EtAbundatGratia No, none of those verses tell wives to "obey" their husbands li

@MikeWingerii @j_bambrick As for “I do not permit” being temporary or universal and the nature of authentein being positive because teaching can only be positive, Mike missed the forest for the trees. As Mike clearly proclaimed after his 4.5 hour di...

@DST_QA @sympatheticNPC @ich1ban123456 @ymmotrojam We of course think that subjecting yourself to all in the body is serving Christ. But what you are suggesting is that the wife must have a special submission and that it is to be led not to serve. ...

@InnovationHQ2 @punkrockproseco @ADRoblesMedia It’s not crystal clear. In 1 Cor 14:34-35, Paul is quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote to him and in 1 Tim 2:11-15 he is pointing out a situation that he left Timothy behind in Ephesus to deal...

@InnovationHQ2 @punkrockproseco @ADRoblesMedia A heretic is someone who teaches contrary to the essentials of the faith. A heretic is not someone you disagree with on a non essential, but is a non Christian. Please tell me⎯what council or creed ass...

@The_Wry_Griot @ADRoblesMedia Forcing unbelievers to be Christians is not the jo

@InnovationHQ2 @punkrockproseco @ADRoblesMedia The church is the only one who judges between the worship of God or not, even then, Christians don't judge the heart or motives of other professing believers. The state is not to act like the church. I...

@MarkGrote @revpmorrison This has to do with the oral law that the Judiazers wer

@SimonReye @hashim_warren @Duke456521 @MikeWingerii Take a look at this clip. Surely he has seen my explanation on this going around X as he talks about social media and I have been responding with this idea for months on any thread discussing 1 Tim...

@laurchas22 But find another group of sincere believers who are true to the scri

@nevermindlind @smashbaals Paul is quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote (1 Cor 7:1). In this case, he is refuting what the Corinthians wrote. “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [men] only?” (1 Cor 14:36 KJV...

@tiermakeracco17 @ADRoblesMedia @smashbaals Yes, that unfortunately does happen too. So where’s the correct path? It’s neither Replacement Theology / Supercessionism nor the Hebrew Roots Movement. When I visited the wailing wall it was to watch wh...

@FaFfRn @Manda2364333130 @Brian_Sauve It’s actually listed as follows: 1. Christ -&gt; every man (ie. mankind) 2. Husband -&gt; Wife 3. God -&gt; Christ Taken strictly on its own, this passage does not appear to be listing hierarchies of authority a...

@Sentinel_VA @smashbaals @TheJaredian Yes, the laws related to clean and unclean foods do not apply to believers after the resurrection of Jesus. However, Paul took a Nazarite vow in the New Testament (Acts 18:18; 21:23-26). He did this post-resurr...

@MediatorsGate @DamonJGray @MissBrneyes @e2pilot @igarglewithfire @kamkorderx Ca

@IanReformed @igarglewithfire Out of context even for a complementarian! What d

@MediatorsGate @Brian_Sauve @CovenantReform2 Well, I think we need to consider a

@MediatorsGate @Brian_Sauve @CovenantReform2 That passage is not about stopping

@Illusive_Smiles @dianemontagna What does that mean that they would have authori

@artdafinakenya Why are you quoting this verse? Even by your own interpretation it would apply only in church. How does this apply to social media? These verses were actually a quote from the Corinthian church in their letter to Paul. Paul rebuke...

@TruthSeekerTKS @SamuelJJack2 Paul wasn’t silencing women, but quoting from the

@LadyDemosthenes @roguebenoir For 1 Cor 14:34-35, Paul is quoting from Judiazers

@OliviaTuggle81 @IndictTheReich @LEBassett Ok, well, except that this was Paul quoting from some Judiazers in the Corinthian church who wrote that in their letter to Paul (ref 1 Cor 7:1). Paul was rebuking them from silencing half the body! “What? ...

@elizabethprata @rosie_rigby You’ve got the right idea that this text means disg

@thunk_huda The reference to the law is part of the quote from what the Corinthians wrote. There were Judiazers infiltrating many of the churches at that time. The “law” is not found in scripture but in the Talmud which Jews consider the oral law—b...

@HabitualLinest @Based_Byzantine @Booksbyjess__ @smashbaals Acts 17:10-11⎯"The brothers immediately sent Paul and Silas away by night to Berea, and when they arrived they went into the Jewish synagogue. Now these Jews were more noble than those in Th...

@HDialector @pauldirks @Eric_Conn I don’t know what you think you are trying to

@HDialector @pauldirks @Eric_Conn Correct.

@HDialector @pauldirks @Eric_Conn Do I know everything they are doing at uni? No. They would 100% tell me…? Yes. They wouldn’t hide it from me? No. Because I’m understanding? Well, I am forgiving. Because I’d have no problem with it? No, I’d ...

@HDialector @pauldirks @Eric_Conn Yes. 100% sure.

@HDialector @pauldirks @Eric_Conn Well, I guess he said many and not all. My da

@Rach4Patriarchy Except that’s not what Paul is saying in this passage. He is not silencing women, rather, he is rebuking those who are silencing women. This is a quote from some Judiazers who infiltrated the churches and wrote what Paul quoted in ...

@GraduatedBen @BonifaceOption Rabbinical Jews don’t read the New Testament silly. 1 Tim 2:11-15 is about a deceived woman teaching false doctrine in the church. The one passage that might highlight Jewish thinking is 1 Cor 14:34-35 which is actuall...

@JeffreyPHo67012 @ortrails @goteamcarr It’s true that if they believe scripture is clear and they violate it that this portends worse things. If you haven’t heard a woman preach sound doctrine, you haven’t been around much or only hear women who are...

@HITlifter In 1 Cor 14:34-35, Paul is refuting Judiazers who are trying to limit

@MargMowczko Since Paul was responding to the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1) and since we don't have quotation marks and have to infer them by the context, wouldn't it make sense that Paul was quoting from their letter which was from Jud...

Bible Link Settings

@FaFfRn @Manda2364333130 @Brian_Sauve It’s actually listed as follows: 1. Christ -> every man (ie. mankind) 2. Husband -> Wife 3. God -> Christ Taken strictly on its own, this passage does not appear to be listing hierarchies of authority a...