Search — Theology Explorer

Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more

All (4043) Scripture Commentary (3050) Theology (173) Mike Winger (795) Pulpit (25)

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-13

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz There’s no quotation marks so all quotes are inferred but Paul says in 1 Cor 7:1 “Now about the matters you wrote” so we know he is addressing things from their letter. I gave the illustration of an intersection w...

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz There’s no quotation marks so all quotes are inferred but Paul says in 1 Cor 7:1 “Now about the matters you wrote” so we know he is addressing things from their let

1 Cor 7:1 debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-13

@lisanicolegaron @RickWarren I get really upset when I find out that women feel

@lisanicolegaron @RickWarren I get really upset when I find out that women feel held back from sharing the truth of the Word with people because of a misunderstanding of several verses in Paul’s epist

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-13

@TrueConsolation Would you consider the Apostle Paul as a church father? How di

@TrueConsolation Would you consider the Apostle Paul as a church father? How did he view women?

question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz Just because Paul didn’t mention it doesn’t mean it is

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz Just because Paul didn’t mention it doesn’t mean it isn’t also the case, that is that the woman is also the glory of God as God created her. She has two glories, two sources

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Do you see how Paul says “I praise you…for h

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Do you see how Paul says “I praise you…for holding to the traditions just as I passed them onto you” (vs2) and then “BUT I want you to realize…” (vs3) ⎯ they don’t

debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Paul is trying to show the REASON for removing the head coverings and why a woman CAN choose to wear one or not. This is why he has to explain both the original created source relationships and our mutual interdep...

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Paul is trying to show the REASON for removing the head coverings and why a woman CAN choose to wear one or not. This is why he has to explain both the original cr

general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz You see that Paul is speaking of source rela

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz You see that Paul is speaking of source relationships particularly clearly in 1 Cor 11:11-12

1 Cor 11:11-12 general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Paul is showing source relationships in 1 Co

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Paul is showing source relationships in 1 Cor 11, not hierarchical authority structures. He is explaining the reasons for the traditions they are following which a

debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @brmorris Except that Paul was quoting from the Corint

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @brmorris Except that Paul was quoting from the Corinthians and refuting them… 1 Cor 14:36 KJV “What? Came the word of God out from you [men]?. Or came it unto you [men] onl

1 Cor 14:36 question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (2) No, I’m not saying for Paul a husband can be a woma

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (2) No, I’m not saying for Paul a husband can be a woman. As I indicated before, I believe this is generic to mean monogamous. Paul says “women likewise” and so why would he

question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (3) Yes, everyone is a servant, even Jesus, Paul, etc.

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (3) Yes, everyone is a servant, even Jesus, Paul, etc. so it can apply to everyone and not only those appointed for non-elder leadership. So how would Paul have to refer to P

question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (2) Both elders and deacons are said to be the “husband

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (2) Both elders and deacons are said to be the “husband of one wife” though Paul wasn’t married and in Rom 16:1 Phoebe (is referred to as a deaconess. “Husband of one wife” i

Rom 16:1 general

Scripture Commentary tweet 2023-06-12

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi The male gender is used in numerous instances as the default gender which we can easily understand is not limited to males. If Paul’s intent is to limit it to males, he has to say ’must be an aner’ or ’must not be a gyne’ ⎯ ...

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi The male gender is used in numerous instances as the default gender which we can easily understand is not limited to males. If Paul’s intent is to limit it to males, he has t

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz There’s no quotation marks so all quotes are inferred but Paul says in 1 Cor 7:1 “Now about the matters you wrote” so we know he is addressing things from their letter. I gave the illustration of an intersection w...

@lisanicolegaron @RickWarren I get really upset when I find out that women feel

@TrueConsolation Would you consider the Apostle Paul as a church father? How di

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz Just because Paul didn’t mention it doesn’t mean it is

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Do you see how Paul says “I praise you…for h

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Paul is trying to show the REASON for removing the head coverings and why a woman CAN choose to wear one or not. This is why he has to explain both the original created source relationships and our mutual interdep...

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz You see that Paul is speaking of source rela

@ymmotrojam @brmorris @CherylSchatz Paul is showing source relationships in 1 Co

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @brmorris Except that Paul was quoting from the Corint

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (2) No, I’m not saying for Paul a husband can be a woma

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (3) Yes, everyone is a servant, even Jesus, Paul, etc.

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi (2) Both elders and deacons are said to be the “husband

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi The male gender is used in numerous instances as the default gender which we can easily understand is not limited to males. If Paul’s intent is to limit it to males, he has to say ’must be an aner’ or ’must not be a gyne’ ⎯ ...

@MarvinMediocre @cpa_dallas @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi If Paul is EXCLUDING

@MikeWingerii @116nathanwalker 3/ Belleville’s article showing the bias in the l

@MikeWingerii @116nathanwalker Priscilla didn’t teach in the local church? Wher

@MadJorgen @RickWarren Paul knows his grammar. Why then does he use ‘a woman’ a

@Nkajunwa @HwsEleutheroi After all of this discussion, you still haven’t demonst

@MarvinMediocre @cpa_dallas @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi Yes literally written

@cpa_dallas @MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi Yes, the Greek is literally “one woman (genitive) man (accusative),” that is that the woman belongs to the man. But this does not 1/ require that an elder must be married as Paul wasn’t marr...

@cpa_dallas @MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @HwsEleutheroi But Paul isn’t himsel

@MarvinMediocre @LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi I’m sorry, I think I

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi I’ve read it and studied it carefully. I used to believe as you. The passage in context is not saying women cannot teach men, but ‘a’ woman cannot teach or “take authority” (means murderer, absolute master...

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi If “anyone” (Greek ‘tis’) desires to be an overseer (feminine), they desire a good thing. An overseer (masculine)… The phrase “husband of one wife” is literally “one woman husband” just like it says “one m...

@LauralovsJesus @cpa_dallas @HwsEleutheroi Then why wasn’t Paul more clear to sa

@davbach823 @cpcwesterville @RickWarren So your view is that you are not supposed to listen to a woman preaching true doctrine or prophesying the truth. Am I correct? That this is what Paul means? And he could not have a specific couple in mind wi...

@davbach823 @cpcwesterville @RickWarren Not suggesting to ignore it! But this w

@davbach823 @cpcwesterville @RickWarren Where does Paul ever say that a man is to have “authentein” over anyone? Why does he use this rare word? The context is to stop FALSE teachers, not women. He highlights that there are ignorant and not ignora...

@davbach823 @cpcwesterville @RickWarren That’s not an answer, it’s a scripture w

@davbach823 @cpcwesterville @RickWarren The emphasis is “one” not “must be marri

@cpcwesterville @RickWarren But if your statement of faith concerning requirements for elders isn’t consistent with the text, you’ll need to revise it. Why does Paul use “tis” in 1 Tim 3 as a generic “someone” or “anyone”? Why doesn’t he just say “...

@jchrisland @RickWarren If someone knows better he names them and hands them over to satan to be taught not to blaspheme. Someone who is ignorant needs to be treated more gently. And in this personal letter to Timothy, both Paul and Timothy would k...

@jchrisland @RickWarren Paul is very specific. He says “a woman” not “women” and “a man” not “all men.” From chapter 1 we understand that Timothy is to remain in Ephesus to stop FALSE teachers not women…and we find out there are two types: ignorant...

@MadJorgen @RickWarren My goodness! This is a secondary issue! Don’t you have

@HwsEleutheroi Where does Paul say “an elder must not be a woman”? Why does Pau

@HwsEleutheroi Not defending Warren’s exegesis, but how is it that authentein is not used to state how men can positively have authority? Why would Paul choose this unique word? And did you not see “Women LIKEWISE…” in 1 Tim 3:11? This word means “...

@MikeWingerii I don’t think Rick is big on exegesis. However, Belleville has done an excellent job in “Lexical Fallacies in Rendering authentein in 1 Timothy 2:12: BDAG in Light of Greek Literary and Nonliterary Usage.” Also, Paul has other words h...

@J17apologetics Eph 1:4 - “…just as he chose US in Him…” ⎯ if every spiritual blessing is given to all who believe without distinction (for there is no longer Jew nor Gentile…all are one in Christ) then the US in v4 has to also apply to all believers...

@J17apologetics Eph 1:3 - “OUR Lord…who has blessed US with every spiritual bles

@J17apologetics Eph1:2 - “…peace from OUR God” ⎯ is this not the God of both Pau

@J17apologetics Surely it is evident to all that there is a “from” and a “to” in

RT @PaulCopan: My e-book How Do You Know You're Not Wrong? on sale @ $1.99 7/19-

Both Calvinists and Arminians are mistaken because they misread Rom 3. Paul is

RT @ProclaimOnline: RT @paulbaloche Sound engineers!! Studio techs!! Thank you f

@ApologeticsCC12 Paul Copan - How r we to understand Exod 21:21 which implies be

To Paul Copan - How was Saul to understand God when He told him to utterly destr

This is the seventh in a series of simulated interviews with the Apostle Paul taken from the position of what he might say if we could transport Paul from the New Testament account through a time tunnel into our present day

This is the eighth in a series of simulated interviews with the Apostle Paul taken from the position of what he might say if we could transport Paul from the New Testament account through a time tunnel into our present day

Reading v22 as a hierarchy command breaks the semantic logic Paul established in v21. Two categorically different concepts cannot share the same governing verb.

Php 2:3-5 applies self-giving posture to all believers. Paul calls husbands to join what was already everyone's calling.

Bible Link Settings