Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Egalitarian responses to Kostenberger's syntactic argument

ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15: Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this) 07:40:00 – 07:54:18

Mike addresses attempts to refute the Kostenberger syntactic pattern.

Egalitarians have pushed back on Kostenberger in several ways: (1) Philip Payne argues that the two infinitives could express a single concept ('to teach in an authoritative way') rather than two separate activities, which would mean Paul only prohibits authoritative teaching, not all teaching and all authority separately; (2) Westfall argues the pattern is not as rigid as Kostenberger claims. Mike rebuts: (1) Kostenberger's pattern has been tested by multiple scholars and holds up across the data; (2) Even if Payne's single-concept reading were correct, it would still mean women cannot do the combined activity of 'authoritative teaching' — which is exactly what elders do; (3) The grammatical structure with two distinct infinitives connected by oude more naturally reads as two separate (related) activities, both of which are prohibited.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Ask Claude about this