Egalitarian responses to Kostenberger's syntactic argument
ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15: Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this)
07:40:00 – 07:54:18
Mike addresses attempts to refute the Kostenberger syntactic pattern.
Egalitarians have pushed back on Kostenberger in several ways: (1) Philip Payne argues that the two infinitives could express a single concept ('to teach in an authoritative way') rather than two separate activities, which would mean Paul only prohibits authoritative teaching, not all teaching and all authority separately; (2) Westfall argues the pattern is not as rigid as Kostenberger claims. Mike rebuts: (1) Kostenberger's pattern has been tested by multiple scholars and holds up across the data; (2) Even if Payne's single-concept reading were correct, it would still mean women cannot do the combined activity of 'authoritative teaching' — which is exactly what elders do; (3) The grammatical structure with two distinct infinitives connected by oude more naturally reads as two separate (related) activities, both of which are prohibited.
← Previous
Kostenberger's syntactic study: two infinitives joined by ou
Next →Application of authenteo conclusion: 'have authority' is the
Responses
Theology
verse entry
Ephesians 5:18-33
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Theology
verse entry
1 Corinthians 11:10-16
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Theology
verse entry
1 Corinthians 11:2-9
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15: Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this) @ 07:40:002023-11-22