Conclusion 1: Complementarian position does not depend on 1 Timothy 2
ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15： Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this)
11:04:27 – 11:05:28
Mike begins his final conclusions for the entire video.
The complementarian position was firmly established through the previous 11 videos in the series without depending on 1 Timothy 2. If you removed 1 Timothy 2 from the Bible, complementarianism would still stand on the basis of other passages (1 Cor 11, 1 Cor 14, Eph 5, Col 3, 1 Pet 3, Titus 2, the pattern of male apostles, male elders, creation order in Genesis). However, 1 Timothy 2 fully and clearly supports complementarian views — not patriarchal views and not egalitarian views.
← Previous
Sacrificing elder authority to support egalitarianism is the
Next →Conclusion 2: Women should fully participate in Christian ed
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Theology
verse entry
1 Corinthians 11:2-9
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15： Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this) @ 11:04:272023-11-22