Mike's four problems with Ramsey's paper: (1) ignores Genesis 1-2 context, (2) confuses WHY a name was chosen with WHY Adam does the naming, (3) argues against magical naming instead of actual complementarian claims, (4) ignores that namers consistently have authority over the named.
Critique of Ramsey's paper on naming
Mary Conway's alternative approach to naming: it's an act of
Next →Ramsey's strongest counter-examples: Hagar naming God in Gen
Responses
Eph 5:22 and Mutual Submission
The mutual and reciprocal nature of hypotasso in Eph 5:21 makes a hierarchical reading of v22 semantically incoherent. Paul cannot establish one-to-another voluntary submission and then immediately mean one-directional hierarchy without breaking the logic of his own passage.
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 10 on the head covering debates in 1 Corinthians 11
Comp View Of 1Cor11 Mark
This post is a first. I have never before taken the writing of a complementarian and posted it on my blog
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
Was Women's Submission Just a Curse to Be Overturned？ Women in Ministry part 2 @ 01:19:192022-03-14