Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Conclusion of hermeneutical argument: 'justified' in James 2 means proven/demonstrated to be right, not salvifically made righteous

The Debate Over James 2： Catholic or Protestant View 00:17:27 – 00:17:57

Applying the Luke 7:29 argument back to James 2

Having established that 'justified' can mean vindicated/demonstrated/proved right (from Luke 7:29), Mike concludes that this is the sense James uses it: faith is demonstrated or proved real through works. This is not about receiving salvific righteousness but about showing/evidencing that real faith exists.
← Previous

Luke 7:29 — tax collectors 'justified God' proves 'justified

 Next →

James 2:14 — 'Can that faith save him?' — the hypothetical a

Responses

Scripture Commentary article

What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Leaders in the New Testament (PART A)

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 4 on women leaders in the New Testament (Part A)
Scripture Commentary article

Specific Or General Woman

This post will be an expansion on the reasons why I believe that 1 Timothy 2:11-15 is about one specific woman and why a general reference to women does not line up with the grammar within the surrounding context. I will also consider the challenge to my view from the new verbal aspect theory
Scripture Commentary article

A Woman Anaphoric

In a recent blog post , there has been some discussion on 1 Timothy 2:11, 12 in the comment section, and the question of whether “a woman” is generic woman or a specific woman. I always appreciate questions and challenges on my position as it continually pushes me to continue to do research in order

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Video

The Debate Over James 2： Catholic or Protestant View @ 00:17:27

2018-03-14

Tags

hermeneutics James 2 dikaioo justification demonstration of faith
Ask Claude about this