Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Barker's 'problem of history': miracles cannot be established from historical evidence — same Humean presupposition as Ehrman

Skeptics Respond To The Evidence For The Resurrection of Jesus 00:27:14 – 00:27:45

Mike analyzes Barker's first objection

Barker states: 'If miracles do happen we still can't learn that from historical evidence.' Mike calls this 'putting on blinders' — you cannot ask a question you are not allowed to answer and then pretend you've answered it. This is the same a priori methodological naturalism used by Hume and Ehrman.
← Previous

Dan Barker's four reasons to reject the resurrection: proble

 Next →

Barker won't commit to a specific natural explanation becaus

Responses

Scripture Commentary article

What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Apostles

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 5 on whether women were apostles in the New Testament
Scripture Commentary article

The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus

Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona — Kindle highlights from 'The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus'. 110 highlights.
Scripture Commentary article

The Giving Part 2: Judas the Betrayer, a Balanced View of the Sovereignty of God

[Music] the giving is a balanced view of the sovereignty of God God's sovereignty is vitally important for us to know God yet it's God's sovereignty taught as a system of theological thought which can lead to a person reading into the biblical text an outside concept that is foreign to the writers i...

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Video

Skeptics Respond To The Evidence For The Resurrection of Jesus @ 00:27:14

2018-03-28

Tags

miracles Dan Barker historical method methodological naturalism
Ask Claude about this