Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Barker won't commit to a specific natural explanation because none can withstand scrutiny

Skeptics Respond To The Evidence For The Resurrection of Jesus 00:27:45 – 00:28:16

Analysis of Barker's second objection — 'possible natural explanations'

Barker advocates for alternate natural explanations as a group but refuses to champion any single one. Mike argues this is strategic: picking a specific theory forces Barker to defend it, and all alternate theories fall apart under examination. Refusing to commit is intellectual evasion.
← Previous

Barker's 'problem of history': miracles cannot be establishe

 Next →

Barker's internal contradictions objection is a red herring

Responses

Scripture Commentary article

κεφαλή (kephale) — Logos Clippings (Cheryl Schatz)

A curated collection of Logos Bible Software clippings compiled by Cheryl Schatz examining the Greek word κεφαλή (kephale) and Hebrew רֹאשׁ (rosh). The clippings draw from lexicons, encyclopedias, commentaries, and academic journals to argue that "source/origin" is the primary metaphorical meaning of kephale rather than "authority/leader," with implications for interpreting 1 Corinthians 11, Ephesians 5, and Colossians 1.
Scripture Commentary article

Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women

Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary article

What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Video

Skeptics Respond To The Evidence For The Resurrection of Jesus @ 00:27:45

2018-03-28

Tags

resurrection Dan Barker alternate theories intellectual evasion
Ask Claude about this