If egalitarians are right, passages like 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 14 must be reinterpreted
Mike explains the stakes of the egalitarian position.
Belleville claims female apostles, prophets, teachers, evang
Next →Nympha in Colossians 4:15 -- Lynn Cohick's claim she led a h
Responses
1 Corinthians 14 — Research Notes (Cheryl Schatz)
Collection of 5 research notes examining 1 Corinthians 14:34-36, including the eta particle argument for quotation/refutation reading, the non-existent 'law' reference, segregated seating problems, and commentary from RtNT and Bender showing contradictions with Paul's affirmation of women prophesying.
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Peppiatt's Quotation-Refutation Theory on 1 Corinthians 14:34-35
[Lucy Peppiatt](logosres:LLS:9781498201476;ref=bible.1Co14.34-35) (now [Peppiatt Crawley](logosres:LLS:9781498201476;ref=bible.1Co14.34-35)) argues vv. 34-35 are not Paul's words but the Corinthians'
Podcast Q1: The "Law" That Doesn't Exist (Impact 9/10, Reconsideration 7/10)
"Brett, verse 34 says women should be silent 'as the Law also says.' You mentioned this was about order, but which law is being referenced here? There's no Old Testament passage that commands women's
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more