Principle for engaging skeptics: only address objections you have a genuine, thoughtful answer to; answers in public forums may serve lurkers more than the person being addressed.
Viewer question about how to decide which skeptic objections to respond to.
Winger's advice: only respond if you have a good, honest answer — one you'll stand behind later. Don't engage just to engage. Also, in public (online) settings, the person you're responding to may not be the primary beneficiary. Many people silently follow apologetics conversations online without indicating their presence; your careful response may be exactly what a lurker needs even if the skeptic himself dismisses it. This means engaging publicly is rarely a waste of time even when the direct interlocutor is unreceptive.
← Previous
Prophecies from Revelation are not recommended for use in ap
Next →Hermeneutics: the art and science of biblical interpretation
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Apostles
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 5 on whether women were apostles in the New Testament
Scripture Commentary
article
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Leaders in the New Testament (PART B)
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 4 on women leaders in the New Testament (Part B)
Scripture Commentary
article
Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions
Gregory Koukl — Kindle highlights from 'Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions'. 123 highlights.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more