Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Winger argues Romans 1 teaches that people have been given sufficient information but may not currently believe it, because sin causes suppression and exchange of truth

Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation? Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate 00:10:14 – 00:11:44

Winger's counter-reading of Romans 1

Winger agrees general revelation is sufficient to be without excuse, but says the result described in Romans 1 is that people have actively exchanged the truth and been given over to a debased mind — indicating a real epistemic change, not just a hypocritical denial of what they consciously hold. Sye counters that you cannot suppress what you do not have (beachball analogy), and that Romans 1:32 says they 'know God's righteous decrees' which requires ongoing knowledge.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Ask Claude about this