Winger argues Romans 1 teaches that people have been given sufficient information but may not currently believe it, because sin causes suppression and exchange of truth
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation? Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate
00:10:14 – 00:11:44
Winger's counter-reading of Romans 1
Winger agrees general revelation is sufficient to be without excuse, but says the result described in Romans 1 is that people have actively exchanged the truth and been given over to a debased mind — indicating a real epistemic change, not just a hypocritical denial of what they consciously hold. Sye counters that you cannot suppress what you do not have (beachball analogy), and that Romans 1:32 says they 'know God's righteous decrees' which requires ongoing knowledge.
← Previous
What does the unbeliever know? Sye argues Romans 1 teaches e
Next →Sye challenges Winger with the concept of epistemic certaint
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation? Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate @ 00:10:142018-08-16