Sye challenges Winger with the concept of epistemic certainty vs. psychological certainty; presses him on whether God's existence can fail to be true
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation? Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate
00:13:46 – 00:16:21
Sye's Socratic method applied to Winger
Sye draws a distinction: psychological certainty is being convinced of something that could be false; epistemic certainty is when a proposition cannot fail to be true. He presses Winger to confirm that the existence of God is epistemically certain. Winger says he is certain God exists but admits he does not fully grasp the distinction. Sye argues that certainty must be grounded in God — autonomous reason cannot produce epistemic certainty.
← Previous
Winger argues Romans 1 teaches that people have been given s
Next →Winger openly admits he uses reason to discover truth but no
Responses
Scripture Commentary
tweet
@rootcausesleuth Paul is quoting from Ps 14/53 and assuming he isn’t taking the
@rootcausesleuth Paul is quoting from Ps 14/53 and assuming he isn’t taking the Psalmist out of context, this is talking about all the fools who deny the existence of God, not every single person. ht
Scripture Commentary
tweet
My daughter's HS teacher thinks that a presentation titled "The Scientific Evide
My daughter's HS teacher thinks that a presentation titled "The Scientific Evidence for The Existence of God" may be offensive. Sigh...
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation? Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate @ 00:13:462018-08-16