Debate over Proverbs 26:4-5: Sye says 'fool's folly' = atheism (Psalm 14:1); Winger says 'fool' in Proverbs is broader than just the atheist
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation？ Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate
00:49:03 – 00:50:03
Exegesis of Proverbs 26:4-5 in context of apologetic method
Sye equates the Proverbs fool with Psalm 14:1 ('the fool says in his heart there is no God'). Winger argues the fool in Proverbs is any person living unwisely, not specifically an atheist. The two passages use different Hebrew contexts. However, both agree that answering with Scripture is central; they disagree on what 'answering' entails.
← Previous
Sye argues that apologists start with God in church but aban
Next →Sye: evidential apologetics aims to convince people of somet
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Scripture Commentary
article
Neopatriarch Once Again Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz
## Challenging my position that 1 Timothy 2:15 is a single woman
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation？ Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate @ 00:49:032018-08-16