Discussion of Acts 17 Areopagus sermon: Paul makes a historical argument from resurrection to Christ's authority, not an argument for the existence of God
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation? Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate
00:55:09 – 00:56:42
Extended analysis of Acts 17 and Paul's apologetic at Athens
Winger argues that the audience at Athens were pagan idol-worshippers, not believers in the God of Israel. Paul presents the resurrection as evidence of Jesus's appointed role as judge. Sye says Paul's audience already had sufficient accountability through general revelation and conscience (Romans 1-2), and Paul was not arguing for God's existence but declaring who God is and calling them to repentance — the resurrection was stated as fact, not argued as probability.
← Previous
Acts 17:31 — Paul cites the resurrection as giving 'assuranc
Next →Romans 2 and conscience: Gentiles do by nature what the law
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Leaders in the New Testament (PART A)
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 4 on women leaders in the New Testament (Part A)
Theology
verse entry
Acts 17:30
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis
Theology
greek term
ἀνήρ/γυνή (aner/gyne)
man/woman OR husband/wife
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation? Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate @ 00:55:092018-08-16