Why have fulfilled prophecy in Scripture at all if one should just presuppose the Bible is true? Winger asks Sye to account for the evidential role of prophecy

Winger argues that if one should simply start with Scripture being true, there would be no need for fulfilled prophecy as a confirmation device. Sye responds: fulfilled prophecy is in Scripture not to prove Scripture but because it happened — it is a fact, not an argument. He also catches Winger in a prior podcast saying he was 'open to another absolute moral standard,' which he says is inconsistent with claiming certainty in Scripture. Winger concedes he may have spoken carelessly.