Refuting the 'temple prostitution' interpretation of Romans 1 with historical scholarship
Q&A question about whether Romans 1 only condemns exploitative or temple-based homosexuality, not loving committed same-sex relationships.
Winger cites two key scholars: Louis Crompton (a gay historian and pioneer of queer studies), who argues that reading Romans 1 as addressing only heterosexuals experimenting with homosexuality is 'strained and unhistorical' — Paul and Jewish writers of his era showed no acceptance of same-sex relations in any form. He also cites N.T. Wright, who notes that Plato's era already knew of longer-term same-sex relationships. Winger argues the 'temple prostitution' reading ignores Romans' actual context, 1 Corinthians, and 1 Timothy.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more